allegedly - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Old bones Ian wrote:One guy not getting mentioned much is Magomed Abdusalamov 14 wins 14 KO's just beat McCline in 2 rounds, but got decked in the 1st. Anyone rate him?
He's certainly fun...but very limited. I imagine he'll be hell of a lot of fun to follow but not go much above fringe level.
Bronxbull666
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 384
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Bronxbull666 »

Shame Bunce ain't on, love him. Lillis and Ron are doing a great job! :OhYes:

Nice to see Julius! :TU:

Great show so far, bargain! The price of a pint of beer a week! Bargain! :OhYes:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Yeah got to admit allegedly is doing it for me, its nice to see boxers from the past getting back on TV. Barry Jones is getting better as the co-commentator , not an easy job to get right. But Barry is doing good so far tonight.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Worst ring entrance ever!!
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:Worst ring entrance ever!!
Certainly the most surreal.
Bronxbull666
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 384
Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Bronxbull666 »

Old bones Ian wrote:Yeah got to admit Allegedly channel is doing it for me, its nice to see boxers from the past getting back on TV. Barry Jones is getting better as the co-commentator , not an easy job to get right. But Barry is doing good so far tonight.
:TU: definitely! I love these nights, good action and plenty of boxing discussion, mixed with bizarre music acts and crazy people! Full credit.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Hope Mark can do this, big ask as he's only had the 1 fight back.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by loaded_gloves »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
Bullshit. After twenty fights, Bruno was still fighting Juan Antonio Figueroa. Frank's opponents coming up were a joke. If you don't know the stories, google the name Johnny Bos and come back when you know what you're talking about.
Your line of thinking is laughable. I know all about Bruno's bum of the month club but within that there was Jumbo Cummings and Scott LeDoux and within two years of turning pro he was fighting Phil Brown, Bonecrusher in an eliminator and Lucien Rodriguez. Anyway, it's all absolutely irrelevant bringing up Bruno's opposition, Wilder has literally nothing in common with him. Why don't you make some tenuous comparisons to the record of Peter McNeeley or Butterbean or Brian Nielsen for all it's worth.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Wales »

Old bones Ian wrote:Worst ring entrance ever!!
Nowhere near the worst. Sven ottke to right said fred singing this Live was worse...


http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri= ... vmGAeM-OIo
Last edited by Wales on 29 Sep 2012, 16:43, edited 1 time in total.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Datsue »

I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Last edited by Datsue on 29 Sep 2012, 16:44, edited 1 time in total.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

loaded_gloves wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
Bullshit. After twenty fights, Bruno was still fighting Juan Antonio Figueroa. Frank's opponents coming up were a joke. If you don't know the stories, google the name Johnny Bos and come back when you know what you're talking about.
Your line of thinking is laughable. I know all about Bruno's bum of the month club but within that there was Jumbo Cummings and Scott LeDoux and within two years of turning pro he was fighting Phil Brown, Bonecrusher in an eliminator and Lucien Rodriguez. Anyway, it's all absolutely irrelevant bringing up Bruno's opposition, Wilder has literally nothing in common with him. Why don't you make some tenuous comparisons to the record of Peter McNeeley or Butterbean or Brian Nielsen for all it's worth.
You really are talking bollocks. Wilder was a top amatuer. McNeeley and Butterbean were not.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by dondada »

Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by dondada »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.
Let me think about that.

(1 second.)

No, he wasn't.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

dondada wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.
Let me think about that.

(1 second.)

No, he wasn't.
My dad's bigger than yours. I'm Spartacus. Etc etc etc.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Datsue »

dondada wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!
Nah guv, not guilty, & I wasn't naming the dude (he was far more polite or maybe just sly than I am) & I'm glad Keith's seen it. S'a shame that he's still talking such utter shite, but there you go.

For the record, Wilder fought the second-fattest dude on Boxrec. Keith mate:

Jumbo Cummings.

Also: Ledoux would still beat Beck, right now, this minute.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Thompson doing ok so far, bit of a rougher 3rd round. But looking fit and sharpe. That Culcay is a good boxer
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Wales »

Thompson doing really well. Punches harder than his record suggests too. Remember mark having a bit of a 'homer' against that french chap, he could well ne on the end of one tonight?!?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Datsue wrote:
dondada wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!
Nah guv, not guilty, & I wasn't naming the dude (he was far more polite or maybe just sly than I am) & I'm glad Keith's seen it. S'a shame that he's still talking such utter shite, but there you go.

For the record, Wilder fought the second-fattest dude on Boxrec. Keith mate:

Jumbo Cummings.

Also: Ledoux would still beat Beck, right now, this minute.
I'll have a pint of what you're on.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by dondada »

keithmoonhangover wrote:My dad's bigger than yours. I'm Spartacus. Etc etc etc.
If your dad was bigger than mine, based on all available evidence, I'd agree with you.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by dondada »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'll have a pint of what you're on.
Based on your comparisons, I suspect you've had enough.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

stupid stoppage, no way was Mark out of it
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Wales »

Joke of a stoppage
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17125
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

dondada wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'll have a pint of what you're on.
Based on your comparisons, I suspect you've had enough.
I'm still five pints behind you.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Datsue »

Keith, mate, we're not talking about Owen Beck who fought Barrett & the Yeti. Last year he lost by count out, a one-punch knockout, to David Rodriguez. If that name doesn't ring a bell, may I suggest your own advice & a trip to the search engine of your choice? He then lost to a debutant.

Both of these were before he fought Wilder. He is Wilder's best opponent. Wilder has also fought the second-fattest bloke ever to step into a ring, according to Boxrec. Bruno fought a load of stiffs, but fornicate me man, think about it: DAMON REED is Wilder's second best win! Damon Reed. Wilder's last fight was against a former lightheavyweight who had one fight in the last five years.

I don't really know what else to say.
Post Reply