allegedly - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

allegedly - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by reggaereggae »

Pulev Ustinov about to start apparently.

Ronald MacDonald is soooooooooooooooooooooo bad it's embarassing.

He can't get through a short sentence without stuttering / mispronouncing / slipping over his words.

He also keeps interrupting Lillis at inappropriate times (trying to finish his sentences) and with his huge tongue his voice is not that clear; like a man talking through a mouthful of porridge.

How did this guy EVER get a job on TV. He's the worst presenter on TV... like some odd Avid MErrion character
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

It's Ronald Mcintosh not McDonald! Even Rawling made that faux pas
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Povetkin will beat both of the Klitschkos.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. Povetkin will beat both of the Klitschkos.
And i'll say it, no he won't :D
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Pulev looks like he could be a top boxer, but there is sometimes something lacking in his work.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. Povetkin will beat both of the Klitschkos.
And i'll say it, no he won't :D
I know I sound like a crazy person mate. I also think Fury will be a world champion. :TU:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. Povetkin will beat both of the Klitschkos.
And i'll say it, no he won't :D
I know I sound like a crazy person mate. I also think Fury will be a world champion. :TU:
Now i might lean towards that one, as long as he is not matched with a puncher for the title, and the Klitschkos have retired.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

How would you see Povetkin-Fury and Povetkin-Haye, Ian?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

If Povetkin comes in out of shape then Haye would KO him inside 5 rounds. If Povetkin gets himself into top shape, then he woulkd pose Haye problems, but i don't think Povetkin has it in him to do the hard work in the gym.
I still think he would be too much for Fury, a bit to allround a boxer and win on points, or stoppage if he's in shape.

I do like Fury, he's never in a bad fight and brings entertainment to the show. If matched right he could win a title, If the Haye v Vitali fight doesn't happen then maybe Fury will get a shot. I can't see him beating either of the Klitschkos, in fact i think Wlad would get him out early , Vitali would get a late stoppage
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:If Povetkin comes in out of shape then Haye would KO him inside 5 rounds. If Povetkin gets himself into top shape, then he woulkd pose Haye problems, but i don't think Povetkin has it in him to do the hard work in the gym.
I still think he would be too much for Fury, a bit to allround a boxer and win on points, or stoppage if he's in shape.

I do like Fury, he's never in a bad fight and brings entertainment to the show. If matched right he could win a title, If the Haye v Vitali fight doesn't happen then maybe Fury will get a shot. I can't see him beating either of the Klitschkos, in fact i think Wlad would get him out early , Vitali would get a late stoppage
I agree with everything you said mate. I think Povetkin would get in shape for Haye or the Klitschkos and if he did, he would stop Haye.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

I wouldn't be in a rush to match Fury with Pulev either, the Bulgarian is looking a good boxer
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:I wouldn't be in a rush to match Fury with Pulev either, the Bulgarian is looking a good boxer
He looked really sharp tonight I thought. His concentration was very good.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

I think Ronald is doing ok so far, nice to see Julius Francis giving his comments, and he comes over well on the TV. Now all i need is Lillis to go away
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Old bones Ian wrote:I think Ronald is doing ok so far, nice to see Julius Francis giving his comments, and he comes over well on the TV. Now all i need is Lillis to go away
Yes! Lillis is absolutely useless:
He said Ustinov was "young" earlier and has now called Wilder a top emerging Heavyweight...eurgh...
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:I think Ronald is doing ok so far, nice to see Julius Francis giving his comments, and he comes over well on the TV. Now all i need is Lillis to go away
Yes! Lillis is absolutely useless:
He said Ustinov was "young" earlier and has now called Wilder a top emerging Heavyweight...eurgh...
I think we see Lillis for what he is tonight, when he's not got the other one with him.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:I think Ronald is doing ok so far, nice to see Julius Francis giving his comments, and he comes over well on the TV. Now all i need is Lillis to go away
Yes! Lillis is absolutely useless:
He said Ustinov was "young" earlier and has now called Wilder a top emerging Heavyweight...eurgh...
He is.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by loaded_gloves »

Pulev is a beast. He'd KO Povetkin, who's just a joke and doesn't want to fight anyone. I think he'd deal with the Klitschko goons.

Good God, how painful is it listening to Steve Lillis? The man is so inarticulate and coarse, it's painful listening to him stumble through his sentences. He makes Big Ron sound smooth and musical to the ears.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:I think Ronald is doing ok so far, nice to see Julius Francis giving his comments, and he comes over well on the TV. Now all i need is Lillis to go away
Yes! Lillis is absolutely useless:
He said Ustinov was "young" earlier and has now called Wilder a top emerging Heavyweight...eurgh...
He is.
In what regards? He's fought no one to say how good he is. He's certainly not up there the likes of Fury, Price, Pulev, Bryant or Mitchell heck I'm not even sure he's much further on than Pianeta, Moddugno, Dinu or Ruiz Jr. In fact I'd say that Fujimoto has achieved more as a professional already.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

iamasadlittleboy wrote: In what regards? He's fought no one to say how good he is. He's certainly not up there the likes of Fury, Price, Pulev, Bryant or Mitchell heck I'm not even sure he's much further on than Pianeta, Moddugno, Dinu or Ruiz Jr. In fact I'd say that Fujimoto has achieved more as a professional already.
He has fought no one because he is being brought along slowly, just like Frank Bruno.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by loaded_gloves »

Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Bruno's 14th fight-Eddie Neilson
Wilders' 14th fight-Dan Sheehan

Bruno's 15th fight-Scott LeDoux
Wilders' 15th fight-DeAndrey Abron

Bruno's 19th fight-Jumbo Cummings
Wilders' 19th fight-Daniel Cota

Bruno's 25th fight-Philipp Brown
Wilders' 25th fight-Damon McCreary

Not even comparable.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by loaded_gloves »

There is no comparison between Wilder and Bruno. Anyone doing so is desperately clutching at straws, probably trying to validate some ridiculous claim they made earlier in the thread.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17124
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by keithmoonhangover »

loaded_gloves wrote:Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
Bullshit. After twenty fights, Bruno was still fighting Juan Antonio Figueroa. Frank's opponents coming up were a joke. If you don't know the stories, google the name Johnny Bos and come back when you know what you're talking about.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

One guy not getting mentioned much is Magomed Abdusalamov 14 wins 14 KO's just beat McCline in 2 rounds, but got decked in the 1st. Anyone rate him?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11810
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Post by Old bones Ian »

Martin Granger earns his money tonight, hard nights work for him there.
Post Reply