Page 2 of 5

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:25
by iamasadlittleboy
Old bones Ian wrote:One guy not getting mentioned much is Magomed Abdusalamov 14 wins 14 KO's just beat McCline in 2 rounds, but got decked in the 1st. Anyone rate him?
He's certainly fun...but very limited. I imagine he'll be hell of a lot of fun to follow but not go much above fringe level.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:26
by Bronxbull666
Shame Bunce ain't on, love him. Lillis and Ron are doing a great job! :OhYes:

Nice to see Julius! :TU:

Great show so far, bargain! The price of a pint of beer a week! Bargain! :OhYes:

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:30
by Old bones Ian
Yeah got to admit allegedly is doing it for me, its nice to see boxers from the past getting back on TV. Barry Jones is getting better as the co-commentator , not an easy job to get right. But Barry is doing good so far tonight.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:34
by Old bones Ian
Worst ring entrance ever!!

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:36
by keithmoonhangover
Old bones Ian wrote:Worst ring entrance ever!!
Certainly the most surreal.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:37
by Bronxbull666
Old bones Ian wrote:Yeah got to admit Allegedly channel is doing it for me, its nice to see boxers from the past getting back on TV. Barry Jones is getting better as the co-commentator , not an easy job to get right. But Barry is doing good so far tonight.
:TU: definitely! I love these nights, good action and plenty of boxing discussion, mixed with bizarre music acts and crazy people! Full credit.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:38
by Old bones Ian
Hope Mark can do this, big ask as he's only had the 1 fight back.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:38
by loaded_gloves
keithmoonhangover wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
Bullshit. After twenty fights, Bruno was still fighting Juan Antonio Figueroa. Frank's opponents coming up were a joke. If you don't know the stories, google the name Johnny Bos and come back when you know what you're talking about.
Your line of thinking is laughable. I know all about Bruno's bum of the month club but within that there was Jumbo Cummings and Scott LeDoux and within two years of turning pro he was fighting Phil Brown, Bonecrusher in an eliminator and Lucien Rodriguez. Anyway, it's all absolutely irrelevant bringing up Bruno's opposition, Wilder has literally nothing in common with him. Why don't you make some tenuous comparisons to the record of Peter McNeeley or Butterbean or Brian Nielsen for all it's worth.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:42
by Wales
Old bones Ian wrote:Worst ring entrance ever!!
Nowhere near the worst. Sven ottke to right said fred singing this Live was worse...


http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri= ... vmGAeM-OIo

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:42
by Datsue
I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:43
by keithmoonhangover
loaded_gloves wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Deontay Wilder's record is indefensible - the stuff of Vaughn Bean and Malik Scott. There is no comparison with Frank Bruno or any world class heavyweight. He also looks awful in his fights. The guy is an LKO1 in waiting.
Bullshit. After twenty fights, Bruno was still fighting Juan Antonio Figueroa. Frank's opponents coming up were a joke. If you don't know the stories, google the name Johnny Bos and come back when you know what you're talking about.
Your line of thinking is laughable. I know all about Bruno's bum of the month club but within that there was Jumbo Cummings and Scott LeDoux and within two years of turning pro he was fighting Phil Brown, Bonecrusher in an eliminator and Lucien Rodriguez. Anyway, it's all absolutely irrelevant bringing up Bruno's opposition, Wilder has literally nothing in common with him. Why don't you make some tenuous comparisons to the record of Peter McNeeley or Butterbean or Brian Nielsen for all it's worth.
You really are talking bollocks. Wilder was a top amatuer. McNeeley and Butterbean were not.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:44
by keithmoonhangover
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:44
by dondada
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:47
by dondada
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.
Let me think about that.

(1 second.)

No, he wasn't.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:49
by keithmoonhangover
dondada wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]
I saw it and remembered that Scott LeDoux was a worse fighter than Owen Beck.
Let me think about that.

(1 second.)

No, he wasn't.
My dad's bigger than yours. I'm Spartacus. Etc etc etc.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:52
by Datsue
dondada wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!
Nah guv, not guilty, & I wasn't naming the dude (he was far more polite or maybe just sly than I am) & I'm glad Keith's seen it. S'a shame that he's still talking such utter shite, but there you go.

For the record, Wilder fought the second-fattest dude on Boxrec. Keith mate:

Jumbo Cummings.

Also: Ledoux would still beat Beck, right now, this minute.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:54
by Old bones Ian
Thompson doing ok so far, bit of a rougher 3rd round. But looking fit and sharpe. That Culcay is a good boxer

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:56
by Wales
Thompson doing really well. Punches harder than his record suggests too. Remember mark having a bit of a 'homer' against that french chap, he could well ne on the end of one tonight?!?

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:57
by keithmoonhangover
Datsue wrote:
dondada wrote:
Datsue wrote:I am unsure if keithmoonhangover realises that someone--& not the person he's having a handbags match with, neither--quietly & ruthlessly demolished his contention that Wilder had fought better fighters a page ago?

[sits back, opens popcorn]

EDIT: Just in case, I am in no way defending Frank's record. Just denigrating Deontay's.
Was it you? I refuse to look back as this would be tantamount to accepting your attempts at mind control.

WAR KAHUT!
Nah guv, not guilty, & I wasn't naming the dude (he was far more polite or maybe just sly than I am) & I'm glad Keith's seen it. S'a shame that he's still talking such utter shite, but there you go.

For the record, Wilder fought the second-fattest dude on Boxrec. Keith mate:

Jumbo Cummings.

Also: Ledoux would still beat Beck, right now, this minute.
I'll have a pint of what you're on.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:58
by dondada
keithmoonhangover wrote:My dad's bigger than yours. I'm Spartacus. Etc etc etc.
If your dad was bigger than mine, based on all available evidence, I'd agree with you.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:59
by dondada
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'll have a pint of what you're on.
Based on your comparisons, I suspect you've had enough.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:59
by Old bones Ian
stupid stoppage, no way was Mark out of it

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 16:59
by Wales
Joke of a stoppage

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:01
by keithmoonhangover
dondada wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'll have a pint of what you're on.
Based on your comparisons, I suspect you've had enough.
I'm still five pints behind you.

Re: Allegedly channel - Povetkin - Rahmsn, Pulev - Ustinov

Posted: 29 Sep 2012, 17:02
by Datsue
Keith, mate, we're not talking about Owen Beck who fought Barrett & the Yeti. Last year he lost by count out, a one-punch knockout, to David Rodriguez. If that name doesn't ring a bell, may I suggest your own advice & a trip to the search engine of your choice? He then lost to a debutant.

Both of these were before he fought Wilder. He is Wilder's best opponent. Wilder has also fought the second-fattest bloke ever to step into a ring, according to Boxrec. Bruno fought a load of stiffs, but fornicate me man, think about it: DAMON REED is Wilder's second best win! Damon Reed. Wilder's last fight was against a former lightheavyweight who had one fight in the last five years.

I don't really know what else to say.