BoxRec

Galvanised Clout wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

You're being obtuse now, you f*cked up, be man enough to admit the fact, offer an apology and try not to repeat this terrible error.

I haven't seen the Groves-Johnson fight yet, but people are discussing it.

I started a thread that said Well Done Michael Sprott, you didn't have to read it - it could have been well done for going the distance or well done for getting married.

Galvanised Clout wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.

Great analogy, a real side splitter.

The main problem with his analogy is that most of the time I can come on the forum on a fight night and nobody has spoiled anything, so his analogy is inaccurate.

Horse wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.

We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.

Am I supposed to check the allegedly schedule before I post about a fight?

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.

Great analogy, a real side splitter.

The main problem with his analogy is that most of the time I can come on the forum on a fight night and nobody has spoiled anything, so his analogy is inaccurate.

I was being VERY sarcastic Horse, thought you'd pick up on that.

keithmoonhangover wrote:I haven't seen the Groves-Johnson fight yet, but people are discussing it.

I started a thread that said Well Done Michael Sprott, you didn't have to read it - it could have been well done for going the distance or well done for getting married.

I think you deserve a second warning for being unrepentant.

keithmoonhangover wrote:I started a thread that said Well Done Michael Sprott, you didn't have to read it - it could have been well done for going the distance or well done for getting married.

The Groves fight was being shown live on TV the Sprott fight wasn't, BIG difference Keith.

Galvanised Clout wrote:I was being VERY sarcastic Horse, thought you'd pick up on that.

I understood that.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.

We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.

Am I supposed to check the Allegedly channel schedule before I post about a fight?

Not a bad idea.

thank fornicate Horse isn't a mod the forum would be closed down in about with the warnings he'd be dishing out

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:I was being VERY sarcastic Horse, thought you'd pick up on that.

I understood that.

It didn't seem you had with your comment.

Galvanised Clout wrote:It didn't seem you had with your comment.

You misunderstood.

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:It didn't seem you had with your comment.

You misunderstood.

I'm misunderstood.

Galvanised Clout wrote:Not a bad idea.

Bollocks.

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:It didn't seem you had with your comment.

You misunderstood.

I'd already poured scorn on Haglers analogy, your comments were pointless frankly.

Galvanised Clout wrote:Having read Haglers dismal analogy above I wondered how long it would be before some knob posted this, well done Fatty

You need to take a chill pill and go for a lie down mate.

Another thing, if you don't want to know the result of a fighter boxing tonight - don't
click on the link of the thread with their name - just a thought for you linear thinking people out there.
It's not the fornicating krypton factor.

Galvanised Clout wrote:

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:It didn't seem you had with your comment.

You misunderstood.

I'd already poured scorn on Haglers analogy, you're comments were pointless frankly.

Cock Off!

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:Not a bad idea.

Bollocks.

What a stupid little man you are.

Galvanised Clout wrote:I'd already poured scorn on Haglers analogy, you're comments were pointless frankly.

I was adding to it. Why are you so bothered by it?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.

No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.

What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt but no you are an idiot Keith, you know darn well that RESULTS should not be in a thread title, etiquette dictates that a SPOILER alert is issued, then if any member does want to know the result they OPEN up the thread. I agree you should get a warning and then a subsequent ban should you spoil it for others going forward.

Fat Git wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:Having read Haglers dismal analogy above I wondered how long it would be before some knob posted this, well done Fatty

You need to take a chill pill and go for a lie down mate.

Another thing, if you don't want to know the result of a fighter boxing tonight - don't
click on the link of the thread with their name - just a thought for you linear thinking people out there.
It's not the effing krypton factor.

The thread title was 'Well Done Michael Sprott' hardly denotes a bad night for him does it? Clicking the link would be somewhat redundant after that?

Twat.

Quick go find an apposite Youtube clip to make us all laugh again

taffytoon wrote: What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt but no you are an idiot Keith, you know darn well that RESULTS should not be in a thread title, etiquette dictates that a SPOILER alert is issued, then if any member does want to know the result they OPEN up the thread. I agree you should get a warning and then a subsequent ban should you spoil it for others going forward.[/quote]

I don't have the friggin' channel, how was I supposed to know a German show was on there? Why would I check?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

taffytoon wrote: What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt but no you are an idiot Keith, you know darn well that RESULTS should not be in a thread title, etiquette dictates that a SPOILER alert is issued, then if any member does want to know the result they OPEN up the thread. I agree you should get a warning and then a subsequent ban should you spoil it for others going forward.

I don't have the friggin' channel, how was I supposed to know a German show was on there? Why would I check?[/quote]
Common courtesy denotes you put SPOILER on a thread title and you know it,If you were not in then wrong why did you change the thread title Keith?

Horse wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:I'd already poured scorn on Haglers analogy, you're comments were pointless frankly.

I was adding to it. Why are you so bothered by it?

The day I need you to 'add' anything to my posts is a long way off Horse.

If you've actually followed this thread you may (just may) notice that I am in agreement with you regarding Keith's blunder, so why you are choosing to antagonize me with your characteristic pettiness is baffling.

Go away.

Am watching Nonito fight live therefore i'm staying off twitter and here to avoid the Amir Khan and UFC results and won't be back till i have seen them


logic

Galvanised Clout wrote:

Fat Git wrote:

Galvanised Clout wrote:Having read Haglers dismal analogy above I wondered how long it would be before some knob posted this, well done Fatty

You need to take a chill pill and go for a lie down mate.

Another thing, if you don't want to know the result of a fighter boxing tonight - don't
click on the link of the thread with their name - just a thought for you linear thinking people out there.
It's not the effing krypton factor.

The thread title was 'Well Done Michael Sprott' hardly denotes a bad night for him does it? Clicking the link would be somewhat redundant after that?

Twat.

Quick go find an apposite Youtube clip to make us all laugh again

Go and cry somewhere else you silly twat - you are going to take this to 6 pages aren't you before you get banned (again). Here you go - another you tube clip just for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkDknjHHJBU