Keithmoonhanger and others

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 15 Dec 2012, 18:33

Put a bloody spoiler on your posts if you're giving results away FFS.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Dec 2012, 18:38

I agree.

15829 · Post by **15829** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:24

In fairness Rawling just pretty much spoiled it on you anyway

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:28

taffytoon wrote:Put a bloody spoiler on your posts if you're giving results away FFS.

If I was trying to avoid a fight result the first place I'd give a miss logging onto is a boxing discussion forum.

Just a thought

15829 · Post by **15829** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:28

Maybe

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:29

Even if you want to follow an RBR or similar?

Datsue · Post by **Datsue** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:30

@markmcgee87 wrote:Maybe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43ELZ9WRsEI#t=35s

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:32

Galvanised Clout wrote:Even if you want to follow an RBR or similar?

Yes, that is the correct answer.

15829 · Post by **15829** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:38

Datsue wrote:
@markmcgee87 wrote:Maybe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43ELZ9WRsEI#t=35s

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:39

Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.

We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:41

Horse wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.
We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.

This.

loaded_gloves · Post by **loaded_gloves** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:45

How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:47

loaded_gloves wrote:How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?

That's already been said.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 15 Dec 2012, 19:54

Horse wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?
That's already been said.

Coz it's right.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:00

keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.

No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.

sweetscience · Post by **sweetscience** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:02

What's the correct timeframe for discussing results

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:03

RBR's/Results COULD be posted on a separate thread, radical I agree but it could work?

MODS take note please.

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:03

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.

Go on Horse, tell him.

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:04

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.

You should receive one for been such a douchetard.

Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:04

sweetscience wrote:What's the correct timeframe for discussing results

Not before it has been shown.

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:07

Hagler2002 wrote:
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
You should receive one for been such a douchetard.

Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.

Great analogy, a real side splitter.

The simple (and some would say courteous) inclusion of the word 'SPOILER' in the thread title would be most expedient (and welcome)

Look Mark managed it earlier this evening:

http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160306

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:08

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
No, it isn't.

You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.

What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:11

keithmoonhangover wrote:What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?

You're being obtuse now, you f*cked up, be man enough to admit the fact, offer an apology and try not to repeat this terrible error.

el_grande_mauro_mina · Post by **el_grande_mauro_mina** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q30ZaJxZH4

Galvanised Clout · Post by **Galvanised Clout** » 15 Dec 2012, 20:14

Having read Haglers dismal analogy above I wondered how long it would be before some knob posted this, well done Fatty

Keithmoonhanger and others

Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others

Re: Keithmoonhanger and others