Page 2 of 3
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:17
by iamasadlittleboy
...wheres a British stoppage when you have money on one?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:20
by The Insider
Groves is wide open and starting to look tired now.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:24
by dookus
Tired as Groves is, he's showing some great stuff in there. I wish he would stop fornicating around with his hands down.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:25
by Horse
Shut up, Rawling.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:27
by steve689
Thought there might be a chance Johnson could 'old man' Groves out of it but turns out Johnson is just an old man.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:29
by dookus
Johnson starting to land some clean right hands in Round 10
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:29
by Hagler2002
What time is the main event on?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:30
by Galvanised Clout
"Imagination with discipline"

Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:31
by mcato
Why can't these commentators shut up!
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:33
by Galvanised Clout
steve689 wrote:Thought there might be a chance Johnson could 'old man' Groves out of it but turns out Johnson is just an old man.
Indeed.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:33
by mcato
This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:33
by JLP
mcato wrote:Why can't these commentators shut up!
It's ridiculous, isn't it? The best commentators don't have to be on constant send. It's TV not radio.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:35
by The Insider
mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:37
by dookus
Johnson down end of round 12, doesn't look too hurt.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:37
by Galvanised Clout
Galvanised Clout wrote:Johnson looked a bit tired against Fonfara and after a competitive couple of rounds he took a fairly sustained beating for the rest of the fight.
Johnson is still very durable and apart from the Smith fight Groves has rarely showed one punch stoppage power, have a feeling poor old Johnson will take another full distance pasting.
Really sad to be proved right, wasn't good.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:38
by mcato
The Insider wrote:mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.
Groves hasn't improved at all! Infact his gone backward
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:38
by crusader
11-1 Groves.
Wasn't a legit knockdown, but doesn't really matter.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:38
by danconnollyeire
Why are the commentators being so negative? Calling him an embarrassment and being baffled why he's not throwing enough. I believe it's called being 43 years old!
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:41
by MightyWarrior
Galvanised Clout wrote:"Imagination with discipline"

I thought I was hearing things when he said that....what a plonker
Groves was as good as you can expect him to be, work man like performance - no one knocks out ol Johnson, but he did the right thing by testing that chin. A good win though, it's going to be fun following George Groves next year.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:46
by Final round
The Insider wrote:mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.
Eh?
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:48
by whiskey
Let's give George some credit, he fought reasonably well.
We all know Johnson's legendary 70-90 punches a round was not going to happen tonight (I dont think he threw more than 30-40 a round).
I thought Groves might have over-exerted himself a little and as a result he lost his shape a lot, that bigger younger punchers would have exploited..
..but otherwise he did well after a long spell out of action.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:50
by Terrrrry
Excellent performance by Groves. Glad he never got caught flush with too many (even though Johnson never threw that many).
For me, Groves was able to hurt Johnson more than Froch did. Although that may be due to the fact that Johnson has aged ring-wise quite a bit since then.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:55
by Final round
Well done to Groves , he kept his focus and kept firing at aJohnson who only seemed focused on keeping his granite chinned rep alive rather than actually winning.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:56
by The Insider
Final round wrote:The Insider wrote:mcato wrote:This is just a young man fighting a very very old tired man. Did Groves learn anything from this fight?
He learnt Froch would end him and Degale would probably beat him.
Eh?
Wasnt impressed by Groves. He may as well hit the heavy bag for 12 rounds. He looked open and tired IMO.
Re: Groves v Johnson
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:05
by MightyWarrior
I wouldn't put Groves in with Abraham though - AA still looks too crafty and hard hitting, pretty sure he'd flatten George - assuming he wins tonight, and it looks like he will.
Not sure what the other options are at 160, but Booth should avoid AA for a bit I reckon.