BoxRec

keithmoonhangover wrote:12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.

You should receive a 3rd warning for writing this. Ban!

misterpunch wrote:townshend didnt like moons drumming. too busy in my opinion

Fair nuff' and you're right he can be quite damning of Moon these days, wrongly imo.. I think it may be a bit of jealousy the amount of love people still have for Keith decades later and the muso in him don't like the unpolished wild drumming style in his old age. He should still be thanking god for Moon as they wouldn't have had the sound or the success without his drumming and antics (creatively they died with him bar a couple of tracks). They should have done a Zep and knocked it on the head when he died.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.

You should receive a 3rd warning for writing this. Ban!

Just so we are clear, I didn't mean to spoil your night.

Furthermore, the only issue I have with you is Fury's place in your monthly rankings.

misterpunch wrote:townshend didnt like moons drumming. too busy in my opinion

There are better drummers, but he was the right drummer for The Who. Townsend called Moon a genius and said he gave the band balance.

thats what pete said when he was being kind to keith. you are right he was visually the right drummer for "the who" but if youve ever tried playing with a maniac who is all over the kit all the time as i have you'll have a lot of sympathy for townshends true "muso" view

No.7 again last night, Cunningham v Adamek, picture the scene with the missus asking me who Adamek is during the No.7

Explained well though, hopefully!

GlobalBox wrote:No.7 again last night, Cunningham v Adamek, picture the scene with the missus asking me who Adamek is during the No.7

Explained well though, hopefully!

I'm not alone in the world after all.

What a bizarre thread.

You fucked up Keith, just dont do it again.

You're not from Northallerton are you??.....................

Wrists wrote:What a bizarre thread.

You fucked up Keith, just dont do it again.

You're not from Northallerton are you??.....................

No sir I am not.

keithmoonhangover wrote:Last night I was a naughty boy and spoiled the result of the Michael Sprott fight for some of the members of the forum. For this, I can only say.... I am sorry.

However, these were my reasons....

1. I found out that Michael Sprott had won a fight in Germany and I was excited by this.
2. In the excitement, I foolishly posted on this forum.
3. I don't have Allegedly Channel Channel, so I had no idea the fight was being shown.
4. The reason I don't have Allegedly Channel is that I am a boxing addict and I like having sex with my Mrs.
5. As a mathematical eequation it looks like this.... Addiction to boxing + A channel that shows nothing but boxing = No sex with the Mrs.
6. I like having sex with the Mrs.
7. I sometimes think of the results of upcoming fights during forplay.
8. I have unresolved concentation issues.
9. When I see the result of a fight, that I have no idea will later appear on TV... I wish to discuss it.
10. My Mrs has no interest in a in undercard fights from German shows.
11. I wanted to talk about it.
12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.

I take it you are offering an apology for this travesty? (and why the pointless and frankly embarrassing comments about your supposed 'sex' life? ... pathetic)

http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160313

Why didn't you simply apologise on Saturday night? It was pretty obvious you'd f*cked up big time, your lack of consideration (some would say stupidity) probably ruined the enjoyment of the Sprott fight for many, however instead of offering an apology you pathetically tried to justify your actions, then resorted to abuse. Galvanised Clout was particularly singled out for this (for some inexplicable reason you repeatedly taunted him about his 'GIRLFRIEND') This abuse of a new and up to press excellent poster (have a look at his superb contributions to this thread: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160309) led to him defending himself to such an extent he was subsequently banned. He was also under attack from cronies of yours the odious duo Hagler and Fat Git and the frankly scary Horse, (is Horse afflicted in some way, is he Autistic, Bipolar, Psychotic, something really is amiss there?) As Clout tried (with little success) to convey to you the word 'SPOILER' inserted in your thread title would have precluded all the rancour that followed, I would also suggest more neutral wording 'Well Done' in the thread title gives the game away somewhat don't you think?

I think a BAN as Forrest Gump, sorry Horse suggested would be too severe but I think it would be appropriate if your ability to start threads was permanently revoked.

Caustic wrote:He was also under attack from cronies of yours the odious duo Hagler and Fat Git and the frankly scary Horse, (is Horse afflicted in some way, is he Autistic, Bipolar, Psychotic, something really is amiss there?) As Clout tried (with little success) to convey to you the word 'SPOILER' inserted in your thread title would have precluded all the rancour that followed, I would also suggest more neutral wording 'Well Done' in the thread title gives the game away somewhat don't you think?

I think a BAN as Forrest Gump, sorry Horse suggested would be too severe but I think it would be appropriate if your ability to start threads was permanently revoked.

How caustic.

Horse wrote:

Caustic wrote:He was also under attack from cronies of yours the odious duo Hagler and Fat Git and the frankly scary Horse, (is Horse afflicted in some way, is he Autistic, Bipolar, Psychotic, something really is amiss there?) As Clout tried (with little success) to convey to you the word 'SPOILER' inserted in your thread title would have precluded all the rancour that followed, I would also suggest more neutral wording 'Well Done' in the thread title gives the game away somewhat don't you think?

I think a BAN as Forrest Gump, sorry Horse suggested would be too severe but I think it would be appropriate if your ability to start threads was permanently revoked.

How caustic.

But he is right (in your case, the rest of it is bollox).

Horse wrote:

Caustic wrote:He was also under attack from cronies of yours the odious duo Hagler and Fat Git and the frankly scary Horse, (is Horse afflicted in some way, is he Autistic, Bipolar, Psychotic, something really is amiss there?) As Clout tried (with little success) to convey to you the word 'SPOILER' inserted in your thread title would have precluded all the rancour that followed, I would also suggest more neutral wording 'Well Done' in the thread title gives the game away somewhat don't you think?

I think a BAN as Forrest Gump, sorry Horse suggested would be too severe but I think it would be appropriate if your ability to start threads was permanently revoked.

How caustic.

Therefore my chosen nomenclature is most apposite.

Fat Git wrote:But he is right (in your case, the rest of it is bollox).

You are a commie.

Fat Git wrote:But he is right (in your case, the rest of it is bollox).

As least we agree on one thing.

Horse wrote:

Fat Git wrote:But he is right (in your case, the rest of it is bollox).

You are a commie.

Caustic wrote:the frankly scary Horse, (is Horse afflicted in some way, is he Autistic, Bipolar, Psychotic, something really is amiss there?)

As if further proof was needed.

Caustic wrote:As if further proof was needed.

You are a rude man.

Horse wrote:

Caustic wrote:As if further proof was needed.

You are a rude man.

Caustic wrote:

Horse wrote:

Caustic wrote:As if further proof was needed.

You are a rude man.