Page 2 of 5

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 05:42
by Final round
I wonder if that opportunist pudendum Shaun Penn will be at the fight flag waving 'Vivas las Malvinas'.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 06:05
by whiskey
http://www.livefight.com/news.php?news_ ... =2013&m=01

Interview with Martin Murray from today.

Seems bang up for it. Even if he loses but does better than Chavez jr, it will stand him good stead with the boxing public.

I'm waiting for Steve Kim to start bitching about Murray, like he did Barker.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 07:08
by P4P#1
I'm goin 775 for flights I paid, lookin forward to it

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 07:11
by Craig14
P4P#1 wrote:I'm goin 775 for flights I paid, lookin forward to it
ahh 2 plus 2, this is why you were asking on the off topic board, good on ya - enjoy, just out of curiousity do you know Martin Murray?

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 08:24
by P4P#1
Craigyid14 wrote:
P4P#1 wrote:I'm goin 775 for flights I paid, lookin forward to it
ahh 2 plus 2, this is why you were asking on the off topic board, good on ya - enjoy, just out of curiousity do you know Martin Murray?
Yeah pal, top lad, hope he can pull it off,

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 12:49
by dandantheweatherman
That's right, there's a referendum on the Falklands this year. It's on 10 and 11 March...the question is 'Do you wish the Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the UK?’.

Not looked into the this, but Buenos Aries is on the othe side of the River Plate estuary from Montevideo. I assume there are ferries between Monte and BA...flying to Monte may be cheaper/easier from the UK. Chile's pretty nice too...not been to Santiago but know a few who've been and said it's good.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 16:33
by palooka
Fat Git wrote:Flights with Air France are pretty cheap - for a return you'll pay around 600-700 quid via Paris.
You can get a nice no frills hotel room for about 20-30 quid a night downtown.

A steak sandwich (with proper beef) chips, salad and a beer is about 2-3 quid. Your pound
goes a long way there. Loads of coffee shops, bars, steak places (called Parillas) nightclubs.

All in all - you could do it all for around 2 grand including flights, hotels, tickets, food and drink
and other fun stuff. :TU:
What a wonderful world you live in and what a wonderful life you lead - fair play to you :TU:

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 16:51
by hurlock
Martinez really got hurt in his last fight towards the end. I wonder how much that has taken out of him or effected his positiveness.
Murray could pull off a John h Stracey style win here. Weirder things have happend

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 22:02
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Fat Git wrote:
Dirk Kelly wrote:
Dirk Kelly wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....
And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.

I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands

What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 12 Jan 2013, 22:07
by Khaosai-Galaxy
dandantheweatherman wrote:That's right, there's a referendum on the Falklands this year. It's on 10 and 11 March...the question is 'Do you wish the Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the UK?’.

Not looked into the this, but Buenos Aries is on the othe side of the River Plate estuary from Montevideo. I assume there are ferries between Monte and BA...flying to Monte may be cheaper/easier from the UK. Chile's pretty nice too...not been to Santiago but know a few who've been and said it's good.
There are indeed many ferries between Montevideo and Buenos Aires. If anyone is going to BA, you really should have a day in Montevideo, its a lovely old colonial style city.

Flying to Montevideo is a pain in the arse tho, its has crappy air connections, its much easier to fly to Buenos Aires.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 08:27
by banjo
No, I'd love to but the Daily Mail says Argies eat Brits plus I'm racing at Cookstown that weekend.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 08:48
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Fat Git wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.

I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands

What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.[/quote]

That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 09:04
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Fat Git wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Fat Git wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.

I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands

What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.
That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:[/quote]


The Falkland Islanders would have to be forced into independence, they have never wanted it and would never vote for it in any referendum.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 09:29
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.


I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands

What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.
That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:

The Falkland Islanders would have to be forced into independence, they have never wanted it and would never vote for it in any referendum.[/quote]

It is not about their choice being paramount, having whatever they want. That is not how life works.

The facts are, they are not British, tell me - do they have representation in any British political office in the UK? the leader of the islands isn't even a Falklander, the British government pick someone to go down there and govern them, and if you are British and want to go and live out there, good luck in getting a visa to settle there. It is probably harder to get a visa to live there than it would be to get a working visa to live and settle in New Zealand or Canada.

And if they came to live here, they would be no more culturally British than a New Zealander, because you call yourself British from 10000 miles away doesn't make you British. It is funny how the 'Bennies' call British people 'Poms' thats right.

Practicalities are basically whilst the Falklands remain British - the threat from Argentina will always be there (and they have the majority of worldwide support in the UN) As soon as you make the country a dominion or give it independence - the threat will cease to exist as Argentina would never dare to invade an independent sovereign nation.

One day, the British aren't going to be able to defend those islands, better start thinking of ways to safeguard its future before the 'Argies' take them off us.

And why has this turned into another Falklands war diatribe? That's right - because some of you are no better than the likeminded idiots in Buenos Aires. :roll: Isn't this about Martinez vs Murray and what to do in the great city of Buenos Aires.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 09:34
by banjo
The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 09:43
by el_grande_mauro_mina
banjo wrote:The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:

Another 'starship troopers' fact, the book it was based on, the heroes were Filipino and from
Manila but Hollywood wanted white people to star in the film so changed the location to
Buenos Aires.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 11:01
by el_grande_mauro_mina
The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
banjo wrote:The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:

Another 'starship troopers' fact, the book it was based on, the heroes were Filipino and from
Manila but Hollywood wanted white people to star in the film so changed the location to
Buenos Aires.
Heroes? Perhaps you misunderstood the film.
I might have, I watched the first half an hour and switched it off. Sci-fi is not my bag admittedly.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 12:54
by P4P#1
banjo wrote:The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:
Lmao same here

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 13:03
by Old bones Ian
P4P#1 wrote:
banjo wrote:The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:
Lmao same here
Please tell me your joking? :lol:

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 13:26
by P4P#1
Old bones Ian wrote:
P4P#1 wrote:
banjo wrote:The first time I heard of Buenos Aires was the science fiction movie Starship Troopers, nice little fun fact to lighten the mood :wave:
Lmao same here
Please tell me your joking? :lol:
No seriously lol, rememer having to get me mum to buy it from woolworths because I wasn't old enough, remember not having a clue were it was

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 13:47
by jtourettes
The 1bangkid wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
:TU: :TU: I agree that the Falklands aren't and shouldn't be (and one day won't be) British but I have
changed my opinion that Argentina should have them. I think these days that the Falklanders,
who have lived there for 180 years should have their own independence and be allowed
to develop the place and become an integral part of the South American economic and
cultural community where - in my opinion - it will flourish.

Not that anyone will mention about the Falklands/Malvinas when you are there - when they
find out you are English, it will be like you have made their day. :lol: 'Ah ingles? My frieeeeeeend
I love the Rolling Stones/Oasis/Los Beatles/Michael Owen etc' it is a place where taxi drivers
round down the cab fare in your favour, where nightclub bouncers smile and wave you into
the club gently, where there are beautiful women everywhere and the smell of steak and pizza.

However, I will say that on fight night, it will be dodgy as eff and the very small minority who hate you for just breathing will be there in force (It looks like it is going to be held at the Velez Sarisfield stadium - Estadio José Amalfitani) It will be packed full of Malvinas veterans, Barras Bravas and many more dodgy unsavoury characters and if Murray beats Martinez - will make Minter- Hagler look like a chimps tea party, when you are at the fight - be careful and watch yourself.

The Argentinian nickname for the English is 'Pirata' as can be seen in the Argentinian version of 'The Sun' newspaper 'Cronica'

http://www.cronica.com.ar/buscador.php?q=pirata

Strangely enough. They haven't called Murray a 'Pirata' just 'los Ingles'

Finally someone who agrees with me on this issue.... Most people I talk to are blinded by the Falklands war or just dont no the history.
:lol:

You said they're Argentinian, Carlos said it's up to the Islanders. Two completely differing viewpoints as the Argentinians want to ride roughshod over the islanders opinions and rights. What's that if not 'modern day colonialism'?

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 14:16
by Khaosai-Galaxy
jtourettes wrote:
The 1bangkid wrote:
Fat Git wrote:
:TU: :TU: I agree that the Falklands aren't and shouldn't be (and one day won't be) British but I have
changed my opinion that Argentina should have them. I think these days that the Falklanders,
who have lived there for 180 years should have their own independence and be allowed
to develop the place and become an integral part of the South American economic and
cultural community where - in my opinion - it will flourish.

Not that anyone will mention about the Falklands/Malvinas when you are there - when they
find out you are English, it will be like you have made their day. :lol: 'Ah ingles? My frieeeeeeend
I love the Rolling Stones/Oasis/Los Beatles/Michael Owen etc' it is a place where taxi drivers
round down the cab fare in your favour, where nightclub bouncers smile and wave you into
the club gently, where there are beautiful women everywhere and the smell of steak and pizza.

However, I will say that on fight night, it will be dodgy as eff and the very small minority who hate you for just breathing will be there in force (It looks like it is going to be held at the Velez Sarisfield stadium - Estadio José Amalfitani) It will be packed full of Malvinas veterans, Barras Bravas and many more dodgy unsavoury characters and if Murray beats Martinez - will make Minter- Hagler look like a chimps tea party, when you are at the fight - be careful and watch yourself.

The Argentinian nickname for the English is 'Pirata' as can be seen in the Argentinian version of 'The Sun' newspaper 'Cronica'

http://www.cronica.com.ar/buscador.php?q=pirata

Strangely enough. They haven't called Murray a 'Pirata' just 'los Ingles'

Finally someone who agrees with me on this issue.... Most people I talk to are blinded by the Falklands war or just dont no the history.
:lol:

You said they're Argentinian, Carlos said it's up to the Islanders. Two completely differing viewpoints as the Argentinians want to ride roughshod over the islanders opinions and rights. What's that if not 'modern day colonialism'?
Argentina is 97% Caucasian and the president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner is half German, half Spanish. Also, the Amerindian people of Argentina were ruthlessly exterminated by the Spanish settlers to the point of extinction.


thats old school colonialism, brother!

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 14:26
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Fat Git wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Fat Git wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.


I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands


What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.
That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:

The Falkland Islanders would have to be forced into independence, they have never wanted it and would never vote for it in any referendum.
It is not about their choice being paramount, having whatever they want. That is not how life works.

The facts are, they are not British, tell me - do they have representation in any British political office in the UK? the leader of the islands isn't even a Falklander, the British government pick someone to go down there and govern them, and if you are British and want to go and live out there, good luck in getting a visa to settle there. It is probably harder to get a visa to live there than it would be to get a working visa to live and settle in New Zealand or Canada.

And if they came to live here, they would be no more culturally British than a New Zealander, because you call yourself British from 10000 miles away doesn't make you British. It is funny how the 'Bennies' call British people 'Poms' thats right.

Practicalities are basically whilst the Falklands remain British - the threat from Argentina will always be there (and they have the majority of worldwide support in the UN) As soon as you make the country a dominion or give it independence - the threat will cease to exist as Argentina would never dare to invade an independent sovereign nation.

One day, the British aren't going to be able to defend those islands, better start thinking of ways to safeguard its future before the 'Argies' take them off us.

And why has this turned into another Falklands war diatribe? That's right - because some of you are no better than the likeminded idiots in Buenos Aires. :roll: Isn't this about Martinez vs Murray and what to do in the great city of Buenos Aires.[/quote]


What a truly awful post.

You cant "force" and "give" people something, its either one or the other.

The Falkland Islands will remain British as long as the residents want it to be, they are the masters of their own destiny.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 14:34
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Fat Git wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.


I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands


What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.
That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:

The Falkland Islanders would have to be forced into independence, they have never wanted it and would never vote for it in any referendum.[/quote]

It is not about their choice being paramount, having whatever they want. That is not how life works.

The facts are, they are not British, tell me - do they have representation in any British political office in the UK? the leader of the islands isn't even a Falklander, the British government pick someone to go down there and govern them, and if you are British and want to go and live out there, good luck in getting a visa to settle there. It is probably harder to get a visa to live there than it would be to get a working visa to live and settle in New Zealand or Canada.

And if they came to live here, they would be no more culturally British than a New Zealander, because you call yourself British from 10000 miles away doesn't make you British. It is funny how the 'Bennies' call British people 'Poms' thats right.

Practicalities are basically whilst the Falklands remain British - the threat from Argentina will always be there (and they have the majority of worldwide support in the UN) As soon as you make the country a dominion or give it independence - the threat will cease to exist as Argentina would never dare to invade an independent sovereign nation.

One day, the British aren't going to be able to defend those islands, better start thinking of ways to safeguard its future before the 'Argies' take them off us.

And why has this turned into another Falklands war diatribe? That's right - because some of you are no better than the likeminded idiots in Buenos Aires. :roll: Isn't this about Martinez vs Murray and what to do in the great city of Buenos Aires.[/quote]


What a truly awful post.

You cant "force" and "give" people something, its either one or the other.

The Falkland Islands will remain British as long as the residents want it to be, they are the masters of their own destiny.[/quote]


But you can, happened throughout history, white Rhodesians wanted to keep the status quo as did white South Africans but they were forced to change, it is not a good idea to let things get to that stage where you need to change because you have been beaten into it.

Nobody who was born 10000 miles away from the UK and has never been here is British - that is how simple it gets, to even suggest that they are requires some twisted colonial logic. Those people in any way, shape, form or logic aren't British.

If they want to remain 'British' then that is fine, but they will always be under threat from the Argentinians - and last time I looked, the Argentinians have the support of most of the UN.

Re: Buenos Aires - who is going?

Posted: 13 Jan 2013, 14:37
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Fat Git wrote: Personally Like having a pop at the Argies, some twat tried to have a go in the MGM last time I was in Vegas. I urged him to come ahead as he had weeks head start last time and we still kicked his ass....

And the people who 'kicked their ass' live in daily torment with the 302nd British Falklands veteran
taking his own life just the other week.

Next time, you and the other Brit flag wavers can go down there and fight it out with like minded Argentinians.

This is a boxing match, not the battle of Goose Green.

May the best man win, I hope it is Murray but looking forward to a great fight with an
electric atmosphere.
Infairness you fanned the flames of nationalism with this thread and some of your posts. The way things are going without the Falklands we're going to be paying an exuberant amount for petrol. What will you say then?? When I worked for a the most profitble travel company I. The world the owner urged us to go see Alaska sooner rather than later as with the way oil prices are going its only a matter of time before they drill there and Antarctica.

On boxing we are due a win, he's beaten a hell of a lot of our fighters!!

Also think there is nothing wrong in a bit of pride in the fact we kicked some ass many years ago when they had a big head start.


I haven't fanned any flames of nationalism at all. Simply put - I am for an independent Falklands


What an odd statement, its like saying you are for an independent Anglesey.

That's right KG - island nations - what a novel concept! :geek:


The Falkland Islanders would have to be forced into independence, they have never wanted it and would never vote for it in any referendum.

It is not about their choice being paramount, having whatever they want. That is not how life works.

The facts are, they are not British, tell me - do they have representation in any British political office in the UK? the leader of the islands isn't even a Falklander, the British government pick someone to go down there and govern them, and if you are British and want to go and live out there, good luck in getting a visa to settle there. It is probably harder to get a visa to live there than it would be to get a working visa to live and settle in New Zealand or Canada.

And if they came to live here, they would be no more culturally British than a New Zealander, because you call yourself British from 10000 miles away doesn't make you British. It is funny how the 'Bennies' call British people 'Poms' thats right.

Practicalities are basically whilst the Falklands remain British - the threat from Argentina will always be there (and they have the majority of worldwide support in the UN) As soon as you make the country a dominion or give it independence - the threat will cease to exist as Argentina would never dare to invade an independent sovereign nation.

One day, the British aren't going to be able to defend those islands, better start thinking of ways to safeguard its future before the 'Argies' take them off us.

And why has this turned into another Falklands war diatribe? That's right - because some of you are no better than the likeminded idiots in Buenos Aires. :roll: Isn't this about Martinez vs Murray and what to do in the great city of Buenos Aires.

What a truly awful post.

You cant "force" and "give" people something, its either one or the other.

The Falkland Islands will remain British as long as the residents want it to be, they are the masters of their own destiny


But you can, happened throughout history, white Rhodesians wanted to keep the status quo as did white South Africans but they were forced to change, it is not a good idea to let things get to that stage where you need to change because you have been beaten into it.

Nobody who was born 10000 miles away from the UK and has never been here is British - that is how simple it gets, to even suggest that they are requires some twisted colonial logic. Those people in any way, shape, form or logic aren't British.

If they want to remain 'British' then that is fine, but they will always be under threat from the Argentinians - and last time I looked, the Argentinians have the support of most of the UN.
F*ck the UN.