BoxRec

polecateddy wrote:Just cos I called you an idiot, you're having a pop. I never once suggested Corrie had much of a chance against Holyfield. He has that punchers chance, which is basically a way of saying there's a slim chance a fighter will win.

You can call me anything you want, I'm taking your buffoonish presence in each thread individually. If you ever say something worth reading I'll be sure to stroke your ego.

Lots of stupid, stupid posts on here, as is usual.

Sanders was a lot taller than Holyfield, and had blistering handspeed for a heavy, punched like a mule kick, and was a southpaw to boot.

I pick Holyfield to win, but wouldn't have been surprised if Sanders cut Holyfield to pieces in 4 rounds.

This was his danger: Sanders was actually a natural fighter, with all the reflexes that went with it.

I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

i think you are arguing with another alias of the sanders nuthugger

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

Yeah, say, the Holy who beat Rahman.

MEISINGER wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

i think you are arguing with another alias of the sanders nuthugger

Rover wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

Yeah, say, the Holy who beat Rahman.

Yep...he'd definitely beat Sanders, but hell even the Holyfield that was stopped by Toney I think would beat Sanders. I may have been exaggerating a bit when I said the Holyfield that lost to Donald would beat Sanders, because Holyfield was basically dead on his feet that night. But Holyfield that had even 5 or 6 good rounds in him would be good enough and tough enough to beat Sanders.

MEISINGER wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

i think you are arguing with another alias of the sanders nuthugger

Piss off.

I have an opinion of my own.

If you don't like it, argue with intelligence.

One sentence ignorant layouts don't cut it.

You're hardly covering yourself with grace here.

Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

Some of the replies seem to confirm the stereotype of the poor, uneducated, illiterate stereotypes of boxing.

Gene Tunney would hate it and box the ears off you.

A decent opinion, if intelligently argued and contrary to your own, should be valued.

No, answer the question.

Don't dismiss the questions and insult people's intelligence, as the questions are pertinent.

You pulled a quite strange scenario out the air, now back it up. Insult people and you are a troll.

Again:

Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

loaded_gloves wrote:Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

I understand that some are a product of a poor education, and take everything absolutely figuretively.

Cutting someone to pieces does not imply a stoppage on cuts.

It is a figure of speech.

kaiserbill wrote:

MEISINGER wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:I can't believe this is even considered by someone as a reasonable outcome. How many times has Holyfield been stopped on cuts? Don't worry I'll wait...

And yet Corrie Sanders is going to "cut him to pieces" in 4 rounds? What planet are you living on?

...and as for the whole Corrie having a puncher's chance thing. Holyfield was as tough and courageous as they come, even on the off chance that Corrie Sanders catches and stuns or highly improbably drops Holyfield, Holyfield would just get up, grit his teeth and come after Corrie Sanders even harder.

Unless we're talking about the ancient Holyfield of recent years. There's no chance Sanders even hears the final bell, much less wins the fight. Holyfield would beat Sanders from pillar to post. He wouldn't even need to be in his Prime to do it. Late 90's-early 2000's Holyfield would be far too much for Sanders even on his best day.

i think you are arguing with another alias of the sanders nuthugger

Piss off.

I have an opinion of my own.

If you don't like it, argue with intelligence.

One sentence ignorant layouts don't cut it.

You're hardly covering yourself with grace here.

sorry if you feel that way
but it is common when someone does not agree with a troll
that they bring on another alias to argue there point

72 posts in 2 years and now a bombing of posts defending corrie?
sounds fishy to pretty much anyone on here.

if i am wrong and you are not polecteddy
i offer my apologies

Loaded Gloves in a horror show of not really understanding the english language.

How quaint.

MEISINGER wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

MEISINGER wrote:
Piss off.

I have an opinion of my own.

If you don't like it, argue with intelligence.

One sentence ignorant layouts don't cut it.

You're hardly covering yourself with grace here.

sorry if you feel that way
but it is common when someone does not agree with a troll
that they bring on another alias to argue there point

72 posts in 2 years and now a bombing of posts defending corrie?
sounds fishy to pretty much anyone on here.

if i am wrong and you are not polecteddy
i offer my apologies

You're ok, buddy.

Quality over quantity, and all that....

I simply have a different opinion.

I still would put money on Evander, but a prime Sanders before the rugby knee injuries....?

Well....

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

I understand that some are a product of a poor education, and take everything absolutely figuretively.

Cutting someone to pieces does not imply a stoppage on cuts.

It is a figure of speech.

I think you mean "take everything literally", Mr Well Educated.

Have some semblance of intelligence if you're going to play the intelligence card.

How embarrassing.

loaded_gloves wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

I understand that some are a product of a poor education, and take everything absolutely figuretively.

Cutting someone to pieces does not imply a stoppage on cuts.

It is a figure of speech.

I think you mean "take everything literally", Mr Well Educated.

Have some semblance of intelligence if you're going to play the intelligence card.

How embarrassing.

At this point it's pretty clear he's a troll loaded, he's not answering questions or contributing to boxing conversation and is making outrageous predictions that nobody agrees with. Don't feed the troll

loaded_gloves wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

I understand that some are a product of a poor education, and take everything absolutely figuretively.

Cutting someone to pieces does not imply a stoppage on cuts.

It is a figure of speech.

I think you mean "take everything literally", Mr Well Educated.

Have some semblance of intelligence if you're going to play the intelligence card.

How embarrassing.

loaded_gloves wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

loaded_gloves wrote:Who did Corrie Sanders ever cut to pieces? I mean, ever?

Name one guy, any guy?

If they are ranked in the top 10 that's a bonus.

Name one time Evander Holyfield was cut to pieces.

One single, solitary fight when Holyfield was gored in blood and there was a consideration of stopping him.

I understand that some are a product of a poor education, and take everything absolutely figuretively.

Cutting someone to pieces does not imply a stoppage on cuts.

It is a figure of speech.

I think you mean "take everything literally", Mr Well Educated.

Have some semblance of intelligence if you're going to play the intelligence card.

How embarrassing.

Seriously?

You are making a fool of yourself with a leap of faith and personal interpretation of my original post.

Stop investing so much energy into a world class athlete who doesn't even know you exist, and look at things with a neutral eye.

Seriously.

You're probably pretty cool in lots of ways.

Why live your life by proxy?

I personally think a prime Sanders would be all sorts of trouble for Evander.

Why you take this so personally, I have no idea.

MEISINGER wrote:

kaiserbill wrote:

MEISINGER wrote:
i think you are arguing with another alias of the sanders nuthugger

Piss off.

I have an opinion of my own.

If you don't like it, argue with intelligence.

One sentence ignorant layouts don't cut it.

You're hardly covering yourself with grace here.

sorry if you feel that way
but it is common when someone does not agree with a troll
that they bring on another alias to argue there point

72 posts in 2 years and now a bombing of posts defending corrie?
sounds fishy to pretty much anyone on here.

if i am wrong and you are not polecteddy
i offer my apologies

This forum is overrun with crap. It was a nice place of solitude for many years. The trolls have assumed control. This whole thread was stupid top begin with. I love it when someone thinks their argument needs another thread for back up. That always turns out well.

gilgamesh wrote:
At this point it's pretty clear he's a troll loaded, he's not answering questions or contributing to boxing conversation and is making outrageous predictions that nobody agrees with. Don't feed the troll

Is a troll somebody that dares to have a different opinion of yourself?

kaiserbill wrote: Sanders was a lot taller than Holyfield, and had blistering handspeed for a heavy

If Sanders was "a lot" taller than Holyfield you must have a reason to think an inch or two is immense. Damn, sucks to be you.

kaiserbill wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:
At this point it's pretty clear he's a troll loaded, he's not answering questions or contributing to boxing conversation and is making outrageous predictions that nobody agrees with. Don't feed the troll

Is a troll somebody that dares to have a different opinion of yourself?

No, but he was asking you perfectly reasonable questions as to why you think Sanders could stop Holyfield.

Who has he ever cut to pieces?

When has Holyfield ever been bleeding profusely to the point that somebody thought of stopping one of his fights on cuts?

Hell everybody's entitled to opinion however crazy it may be, but there's no need to insult somebody's inteligence when they're just trying to move the conversation forward, and see why it is you think what you think.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
This forum is overrun with crap. It was a nice place of solitude for many years. The trolls have assumed control. This whole thread was stupid top begin with. I love it when someone thinks their argument needs another thread for back up. That always turns out well.

I post here irregularly, due to the points you raise.

However....

Surely without a differing opinion, you'll simply end up talking to yourself, or a succession of fluffers.

Sorry, I plead guilty to feeding the troll. It's quite fitting that he's named himself after a disastrous historical figure however.

Anyway he and his various Boxrec alter-egos can disappear back under his bridge to discuss boxing intelligently.

Hey, can anyone remind me of one of those numerous famous results where a guy was so cut up he fell unconscious and was counted out? I'm not well educated enough to recall one.