LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW season week 10 Matchups

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:I'm thinking that the loss rule does not begin until next week. Now of course crease will have a different opinion, but from my point of view, until we have sanctioning bodies with top 10 lists,and those lazy organization begin to carry their weight, then the champions can decide for themselves.

This would of course be the last week of such informal options.
Unfortunately the "coming off a loss" rule is in effect, and has been since the Title Elims.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

TITLE NEWS

For our Four World Champions: - Here are following elligible challengers for your World Titles:

5 Michalczewski
6 Spinks
7 Moore
12 Bivins
13 Hopkins


This has been edited after Buzz's announcement to withdraw the "coming off a loss" ruling.
All the rest of the contenders have signed for fights already this week.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

Prizefighter line up has been confirmed!!!

The draw will take place tomorrow.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by HomicideHenry »

Crease wrote:TITLE NEWS

For our Four World Champions: - Here are following elligible challengers for your World Titles:

5 Michalczewski
6 Spinks
8 Moorer
9 Lewis
10 Tunney
11 Rosenbloom
12 Bivins
14 Johnson
Lemme see, Charles already defended the title to Rosenbloom and Fox, and won the unifier from Moorer, and also defended the title against Michalczewski. So, we want a rematch with JOHNY HENRY LEWIS. Jesus bless.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by HomicideHenry »

Gypsy Johnny Frankham wants Braehmer, Jurgen
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: LHW season week 10 Matchups

Post by BoxBuzz »

Crease wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:I'm thinking that the loss rule does not begin until next week. Now of course crease will have a different opinion, but from my point of view, until we have sanctioning bodies with top 10 lists,and those lazy organization begin to carry their weight, then the champions can decide for themselves.

This would of course be the last week of such informal options.
Unfortunately the "coming off a loss" rule is in effect, and has been since the Title Elims.

Crease, I want to show flexibility here. If a fighter is commish top 10, and incurred a loss this week I would grant a waiver for this. To seek a lower level defense is acceptable as well. But I don't want to stop a top 10 fighter from participating THIS WEEK ONLY.

Once the sanctioning body ratings come out next week, we will go full formal on this. Not sure who this effects....perhaps BHOP? Many other fighters will be involved in the tourney you have planned. By the way you will need to inform me of how that goes again. I can never remember all the crease sanctioning details of that.

However I'm happy to discuss this on a case by case basis.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by BoxBuzz »

DetroitHxC wrote:Crease, you've made a mistake.

Rosenbloom has agreed to fight Stribling for the IBO title, yet you have it listed as a regular fight underneath Rosenbloom's name, who is listed as not having an opponent for his IBO Title fight. So now Rosenbloom is up there twice, and the fight is improperly listed as a non-title fight.

This should not be a problem. The IBO is an easily negotiated trinket.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

DetroitHxC wrote:Rosenbloom has agreed to fight Stribling for the IBO title, yet you have it listed as a regular fight underneath Rosenbloom's name, who is listed as not having an opponent for his IBO Title fight. So now Rosenbloom is up there twice, and the fight is improperly listed as a non-title fight.
Thanks for that Mr Detroit. Due to time restraints, I only had 2 hours earlier to get things done, and so I was rushing. But luckily, that was a minor error - and it it was easily sorted.

Good luck with fighting for the belt... And the same goes for Mr FOL for that matter.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW season week 10 Matchups

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:Crease, I want to show flexibility here. If a fighter is commish top 10, and incurred a loss this week I would grant a waiver for this. To seek a lower level defense is acceptable as well. But I don't want to stop a top 10 fighter from participating THIS WEEK ONLY.
As you wish. I have no inclination on either way of the matter - I only highlighted what had been going on in weeks 8 and 9.

I will immediately edit the TITLE NEWS bit and add in all available top 14 fighters.
:TU:
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by armageto »

Crease wrote:TITLE NEWS

For our Four World Champions: - Here are following elligible challengers for your World Titles:

5 Michalczewski
12 Bivins
14 Johnson

Seeing these guys are eligible to fight and either unmatched or going against a CPU opponent, WBA champ Tommy Loughran offers a fight to any of these three guys.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by armageto »

Also, please put Jack Dillon against Jose Torres, since he is open for any challenger.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

armageto wrote:Also, please put Jack Dillon against Jose Torres, since he is open for any challenger.
Done.
:TU:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

armageto wrote:Seeing these guys are eligible to fight and either unmatched or going against a CPU opponent, WBA champ Tommy Loughran offers a fight to any of these three guys.
Johnson has agreed a fight with a CPU opponent - but maybe he will pull out to make himself available for it.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:UNMATCHED FIGHTERS
ARMAGETO - TOMMY LOUGHRAN
BIGJUICYHOG - FLOYD PATTERSON
BOXBULLY - EDDIE MUSTAFA MUHAMMAD, JOE KNIGHT
DMA1987 - JACK DELANEY
FIST OF LEGEND - JIMMY BIVINS
GLITTERMONKEY - ARCHIE MOORE, DARIUSZ MICHALCZEWSKI
KEVO - MICHAEL SPINKS
P4P1 - FREDDIE MILLS
SOCKDOLAGER - BOB FOSTER
:TU:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by Crease »

Bernard Hopkins will fight Mate Parlov this week.

Tommy Burns will fight Eric Crumble.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by armageto »

Crease wrote:
armageto wrote:Seeing these guys are eligible to fight and either unmatched or going against a CPU opponent, WBA champ Tommy Loughran offers a fight to any of these three guys.
Johnson has agreed a fight with a CPU opponent - but maybe he will pull out to make himself available for it.

Sounds good, out of 3 people, one of them should be up for a title shot.
'Frilla
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2716
Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 07:39

Re: LHW season week 10 Matchups

Post by 'Frilla »

armageto wrote:
'Frilla wrote:Jose Torres will fight any man.

Jack Dillon and Torres sounds like a fair matchup.
:TU:
'Frilla
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2716
Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 07:39

Re: LHW season week 10 Matchups

Post by 'Frilla »

'Frilla wrote:Jack Root will fight Anthony Mundine.
Please disregard this post Commish, Jack Root is fighting in the Prize Fighter.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by kevo »

Someone fight Spinx, you shower of shithouses.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by DMA1987 »

kevo wrote:Someone fight Spinx, you shower of shithouses.
I've just swapped Delaney for Ketchel if you fancy going with Stanley?
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by kevo »

DMA1987 wrote:
kevo wrote:Someone fight Spinx, you shower of shithouses.
I've just swapped Delaney for Ketchel if you fancy going with Stanley?
For real? I like you D, you're a sound guy, and I'm starting to feel bad about beating your fighters.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by DMA1987 »

kevo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
kevo wrote:Someone fight Spinx, you shower of shithouses.
I've just swapped Delaney for Ketchel if you fancy going with Stanley?
For real? I like you D, you're a sound guy, and I'm starting to feel bad about beating your fighters.
Its a privilege to build your record.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by kevo »

Gracious both before and after defeat. The fight is signed.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by BoxBuzz »

Notice that DMA waited until AFTER the Gibbons and Loughran fights could not be made before he offered Ketchel as an options. Smacks of false bravado.


Hmm who approved the Ketchel swap? Was that Crease? If it does not have approval.....I suppose I can rubber stamp this for a small processing fee.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:

Post by DMA1987 »

BoxBuzz wrote:Notice that DMA waited until AFTER the Gibbons and Loughran fights could not be made before he offered Ketchel as an options. Smacks of false bravado.


Hmm who approved the Ketchel swap? Was that Crease? If it does not have approval.....I suppose I can rubber stamp this for a small processing fee.
A delightful picture involving me and a sheep?
Post Reply