Cotto vs Rodriguez

For RBR threads only
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Cotto not warming up?
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

90-81 Crawford
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

100-90 crawford
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Code: Select all

#  Winner         Deductions         Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1  Crawford [***] 
2  Crawford [** ] 
3  Crawford [***] 
4  Crawford [***] 
5  Crawford [***]
6  Crawford [***]
7  Crawford [***]
8  Crawford [*  ]
9  Crawford [***]
10 Crawford [***]
11  [   ]   
12  [   ]   


Final Scorecard
Crawford 100-90

Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [   ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 100-90

Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [   ] and [*  ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 99-91

Total Star Count (minus pt deductions) (Who "felt" like the winner)
Crawford 27 | Klimov 0


Confidence Scale
------------------

[***] - Impossible to score it differently.  Usually the loser gets hurt or does basically nothing.
[** ] - Definite reach to score it differently.
[*  ] - Arguable, but a likely score.
[   ] - Could've went to either fighter or scored even.

MPD  = Mandatory point deductions (knockdown, penalty).
NMPD = Non-mandatory point deductions.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Glad that sh*t's over. I didn't even care to watch most of the bout.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

No doubt Cotto vs Rodriguez will be the most exciting bout of the day :box:
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

JCS wrote:
Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

For christ sake, it's almost midnight.... let's delay this BS some more.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Tanzio wrote:
JCS wrote:
Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.

Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Cotto - what's not to like . . . and I like Rodriguez too.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

boobs
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

WAR MIGUEL!!! :box:
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by diddy »

Holy Tecate girl on the right. Delicious.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
JCS wrote:
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.

Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Your wet dream sucked today. Embarrassed himself. Utterly putrid.

Crawford vs Klimov was a superior boxing match.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by diddy »

90 seconds in....Rodriguez has no chance in this fight.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17238
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Baby Face Finster »

This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Clear 1st round for Cotto.

10-9 Cotto
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Round 1 = 10-9 Cotto . . . he is looking crisp so far.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Baby Face Finster wrote:This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.
Crawford-Klimov and Wlad-Povetkin combined :lol:
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by diddy »

Will be surprised if Rodriguez makes it more than halfway through this fight.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by JCS »

Rodriguez just got hit with a sonic boom at the end of the round.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by gilgamesh »

Cotto's looking tremendous through 2 rounds. Showing he's on a level that Rodriguez has never seen.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Post by Tanzio »

Round 2 = 10-9 Cotto (20-18). Cotto looking clean tonight, severe.
Post Reply