Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Canelo
64
45%
Lara
77
55%
 
Total votes: 141

handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23031
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by handsofstone »

Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone

Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot

Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands

Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Brut
Super Middleweight
Posts: 184
Joined: 18 Feb 2013, 13:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Brut »

handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone

Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot

Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands

Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end

:roll: :doh: :shame:
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by NateJR »

handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone

Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot

Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands

Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Lara lost, so must be you don't give Lara kudos?

I don't like to use the term "running" in boxing.. But sometimes you have to let your shield down and take some risks.. Even little ass Floyd stood in front of Canelo, big bad Lara didn't take a step forward all night. It's a damn shame because Lara should have won the fight, he's the better boxer.. But he didn't do enough to deserve a clear decision.. Yes Lara made Alvarez miss, but he didn't make him pay on a consistent basis. When you throw a limited amount of shots like Lara was, that doesn't leave a lasting impression on the judges when Alvarez is the one coming forward and taking all the risks.

I'm all for the sweet science in boxing.. Hitting and not being hit is the name of the game, but there is other criteria to judge a fight on. Alvarez was the one forcing the action, throwing more punches and leaving that lasting impression on the judges. Lara was landing some sharp punches and they were the telling shots but he was no consistent enough.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23031
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by handsofstone »

Brut wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone

Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot

Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands

Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end

:roll: :doh: :shame:
Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slick
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by dempseyfire »

handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone

Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot

Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands

Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
This. If a fighter's style is lateral movement and he's landing more punches, the onus is on the other guy to cut the ring off. THAT IS BOXING. If you are going to penalize a fighter for not slugging it out you are watching the wrong sport.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Horse »

Alvarez won clearly.

The current poll result is embarrassing to this forum.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:Alvarez won clearly.

The current poll result is embarrassing to this forum.
What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Horse »

ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
He was running and his workrate was awful.
ikorolev wrote:He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
Floyd does not fight like Lara. He is far superior to Lara.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:
ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
He was running and his workrate was awful.
Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Horse »

ikorolev wrote:Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.
No, his workrate was better.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:
ikorolev wrote:Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.
No, his workrate was better.
It was better if you count hitting air.
Image
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Horse »

Wow, a picture of a punch!
vicdavy
Middleweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 25 Jan 2014, 11:57

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by vicdavy »

Lara Sucks! I paid to see a fight not a track meet! Lara ran and Canelo chased,that's not boxing. If Lara would have fought Canelo he would have got knocked out!
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:Wow, a picture of a punch!
Well, landed punches is the main thing which is supposed to count, and Lara landed significantly more clean punches.
vicdavy
Middleweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 25 Jan 2014, 11:57

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by vicdavy »

Badhusker wrote:Hope there is a rematch, but doubt if there will be.

I would love to see Canelo vs Andrade but he will probably fight Cotto or Kirkland. Canelo vs GGG would be a fun one to watch too.
I like Canelo,but GGG would annihilate Canelo.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Final round »

Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
Badhusker
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Badhusker »

Final round wrote:Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
He should have, but I sensed he was a little afraid of Canelo's power, or he would have. If he would have stepped up his aggressiveness, it would have been better for him in the eyes of the judges.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Final round »

Badhusker wrote:
Final round wrote:Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
He should have, but I sensed he was a little afraid of Canelo's power, or he would have. If he would have stepped up his aggressiveness, it would have been better for him in the eyes of the judges.
Yeah it would have done, although I think the one judge flat out decided Lara's style 'ain't my kind of boxing' from the start.
Brut
Super Middleweight
Posts: 184
Joined: 18 Feb 2013, 13:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Brut »

ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
You're such a flake, if Mayweather does that same type of style vs Maidana or anyone else you'll be the first to call it "running" but when it's someone you like you give it a pass. :roll:
handsofstone wrote:Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slick
What does me seeing Canelo win a fight have to do with Floyd? You're just upset because the guy you picked lost the fight, the judges got it right (except the 117-111 card) but you guys fail to take into account that Saul was the effective aggressor, his bodyshots wore Lara down and clearly had more effect, he controlled the ring (generalship), he made the workrate of Erislandy drop.

You should learn the art of boxing before you open your big trap.
PsychoGamer
Super Middleweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 29 Jun 2012, 11:24

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by PsychoGamer »

What about a draw? Canelo can talk as much he wants. Lara may been running, but he also connected more, tagging him, throwing combinations. Canelo had some bodyshots & one good uppercut, thats it. If he wants a slugfest & not a boxing 'match' he should leave this division & fight Golovkin as middleweight.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23031
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by handsofstone »

Brut wrote:
ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
You're such a flake, if Mayweather does that same type of style vs Maidana or anyone else you'll be the first to call it "running" but when it's someone you like you give it a pass. :roll:
handsofstone wrote:Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slick
What does me seeing Canelo win a fight have to do with Floyd? You're just upset because the guy you picked lost the fight, the judges got it right (except the 117-111 card) but you guys fail to take into account that Saul was the effective aggressor, his bodyshots wore Lara down and clearly had more effect, he controlled the ring (generalship), he made the workrate of Erislandy drop.

You should learn the art of boxing before you open your big trap.
I infact had Canelo close points in the PTBF so "the guy i picked" never lost the fight but i did feel that Lara would deserve the W but probably come up short on the cards and i was right and Saul may have been the aggressor but he still didnt land a punch of note,he was having success to the body but Lara was using a lot of lateral movement or running as some call it so it was inevitable that he would slow in the later rounds but he still done a good job of making Canelo miss
Woldemar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Woldemar »

Lara 116-112
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23031
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by handsofstone »

Woldemar wrote:Lara 116-112
Ditto :TU:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

Horse wrote:
ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
He was running and his workrate was awful.
ikorolev wrote:He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
Floyd does not fight like Lara. He is far superior to Lara.
His work rate wasn't high, but how does that justify him losing? Does it override his arguably higher accuracy, more frequent connects, and cleaner punching? Would he get more credit if he threw 50 more punches and none of them landed?

I understand that by moving so much and not being very active he arguably allowed Canelo to keep the punches landed comparable despite being less accurate, but it sounds like people are penalizing Lara just because they found his style unpleasant. It's easy to see his style could be considered unappealing, but when his movement resulted in Canelo missing wildly with almost everything he threw during those periods of movement, and when he landed clean shots throughout the bout and arguably out landed Alvarez in most rounds, I don't see strong grounds for appealing to Lara's 'running' and low work rate as reasons why any card not in Canelo's favor is poor.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Horse »

crusader wrote:His work rate wasn't high, but how does that justify him losing? Does it override his arguably higher accuracy, more frequent connects, and cleaner punching? Would he get more credit if he threw 50 more punches and none of them landed?
I used to respect you. I thought you were one of the best posters on here, but all Cuban worshippers are worthy of contempt.
crusader wrote:I understand that by moving so much and not being very active he arguably allowed Canelo to keep the punches landed comparable despite being less accurate, but it sounds like people are penalizing Lara just because they found his style unpleasant. It's easy to see his style could be considered unappealing, but when his movement resulted in Canelo missing wildly with almost everything he threw during those periods of movement, and when he landed clean shots throughout the bout and arguably out landed Alvarez in most rounds, I don't see strong grounds for appealing to Lara's 'running' and low work rate as reasons why any card not in Canelo's favor is poor.
Cubans = boxing cancer.

I despise their style with every fibre of my being. They are the antithesis of everything worthwhile.

Their support on this site makes me question the purpose of living.

I don't understand humanity. What's the point?
Post Reply