Re: changed my assessment on the HW division
Posted: 01 Dec 2014, 19:29
We just had a year where heavyweight promoters went apesh*t on making great fights. We had Wlad - Pulev, Povetkin - Takam, Povetkin - Charr, Fury - Chisora, Stiverne - Arreola, Glazkov - Adamek, Szpilka - Adamek, Jennings - Szpilka, Jennings - Perez, Thompson - Solis, Thompson - Takam, Cunningham - Mansour, and Takam - Perez. There are only a few contenders who did not do anything really special this year, like Teper, Ruiz, Hammer, Browne, and Wilder; but on the whole, the division served-up an amazing year of contender-on-contender action.jujigatame wrote:There are a lot of interesting fights in the HW division if promoters just had the balls to make them. I would really like to see more guys putting their 0s on the line in fights like this:
Fury vs. Glazkov
Ruiz vs. Teper
Joshua vs. Browne
But sadly promoters are always afraid to make fights like this.
I'd also like to see Povetkin/Pulev in a sort of "Klitchko consolation" fight.
Also, I think it's probably better in many cases when you don't match-up two undefeated contenders. The reason I say that is when you have a match-up like Andy Ruiz Jr. vs Erkan Teper, they're both unknowns, and after the fight, they're basically still both unknowns, because you have no idea how good the guy he just beat / lost to was. I would prefer that the unproven undefeateds fight an equally matched and far more proven opponent like Mike Perez and Steve Cunningham, so that we know exactly how good the unproven fighter is by fight's end.