Page 2 of 2
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 08:35
by J
Dan Dares wrote:jessi wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:I just cannot watch Bunce any more I'm sad to say, he's like a hyperventilating set of bagpipes.
Really ? His not that bad
Yeah, he is, he's f**king awful.
Out of the four, Boxing Matters is probably the best.
he is ok .
on fast forward and mute.
its like having a scatty red setter with Attention deficit disorder in the room when he goes into one.
cant bear it.
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 12 Dec 2014, 12:57
by stujones
Boxerbeetle wrote:ScottDetonator wrote:MH90 wrote:Dempsey the best presenter of the lot, better guests, and not as much arse kissing as Bunce's.
Dempsey does cut straight to the bone with his questions. Loved how he got straight into Eubank Snr when he had them on last week. I think he caught Snr off guard and tongue tied for a few.
Dempsey's great. I always get nostalgic about him dressed in a full tux for the mid 90s Sky all-nighters whenever I see him.
Is hair is the same, does he still end with his signature "bye for now".
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 05 Mar 2015, 18:32
by Cholo_cws
Ringside made me cringe tonight. Enjoyed Ed Robinson presenting but I couldn't begin to make sense of what Glenn McCrory was saying - neither his reasoning behind his view that Frampton and Quigg are the best two in the world in their division (whilst Quigg was sat there by his side) nor his belief that the big/unifying fights are starting to be made now that Floyd-Pac is finally on.
Anyway, Ed for permanent host!
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 06 Mar 2015, 03:19
by jessi
Cholo_cws wrote:Ringside made me cringe tonight. Enjoyed Ed Robinson presenting but I couldn't begin to make sense of what Glenn McCrory was saying - neither his reasoning behind his view that Frampton and Quigg are the best two in the world in their division (whilst Quigg was sat there by his side) nor his belief that the big/unifying fights are starting to be made now that Floyd-Pac is finally on.
Anyway, Ed for permanent host!
Agree with Ed running it permanently !
Think glen meant best fight but not best two, glad Ed pulled him on it
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 06 Mar 2015, 12:56
by IRLangmaid25
Boxerbeetle wrote:ScottDetonator wrote:MH90 wrote:Dempsey the best presenter of the lot, better guests, and not as much arse kissing as Bunce's.
Dempsey does cut straight to the bone with his questions. Loved how he got straight into Eubank Snr when he had them on last week. I think he caught Snr off guard and tongue tied for a few.
Dempsey's great. I always get nostalgic about him dressed in a full tux for the mid 90s Sky all-nighters whenever I see him.
I remember him not giving David Haye much slack when ESPN showed a Wladimir Klitschko title defence against Mormeck (I think). Haye was giving out of stick about Wladimir etc. Dempsey hauled him up on it.
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 06 Mar 2015, 14:02
by manchester-mexican
McCrory thinks Frampton would beat Quigg but stopped short of saying it, bcoz Quigg beside him, Bunce ruins BN for me tbh.
Re: Boxing matters, boxing tonight, ringside or buncey ?
Posted: 07 Mar 2015, 03:56
by veriton
dempsey is the top man by a long way, he always asks great questions and has got a bit of gravitas.
buncey is a good laugh, like his style but his enthusiasm gets the better of him sometimes and he's a bit too gushing. still tune in to his show though.
adam smith seems a bit of a t it, in a "public schoolboy trying to hang around with the hard lads to earn some street cred down at the polo club" kind of way. he seems to have driven sky's boxing content into the ground