Fury v Hammer Thoughts

moogie101
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 406
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:11

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by moogie101 »

For me its another example of the clever booking of Fury's career, he'll get another easy win & be totally unprepared for the step up in class when he gets in there with Wlad & gets destroyed.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by lillywhite14 »

moogie101 wrote:For me its another example of the clever booking of Fury's career, he'll get another easy win & be totally unprepared for the step up in class when he gets in there with Wlad & gets destroyed.
Clever in one sense ( he's already landed a mandatory title shot and has earned decent money and will get the payday that comes with the title shot ) but stupid in another ( as you say, leaves him totally unprepared for someone like Wlad )

Looking through his record it's clear as day that he has been kept away from anyone deemed to have even decent power. I hope that's just a cocincidence!
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by ILikeBeer »

lillywhite14 wrote:
Clever in one sense ( he's already landed a mandatory title shot and has earned decent money and will get the payday that comes with the title shot ) but stupid in another ( as you say, leaves him totally unprepared for someone like Wlad )

Looking through his record it's clear as day that he has been kept away from anyone deemed to have even decent power. I hope that's just a cocincidence!
Course it's not.

He got knocked over by Steve Cunningham, ffs. He's gonna get his head knocked off if he fights somebody of a similar height, or who can bang.
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Tangerine »

THEBUTCH wrote:Why is Fury not defending his EBU title against Hamer?
Cos Erkan Teper (guy who kayoed Sprott and Rogan in 1rnd) has been made mandatory for EBU.Expect Fury to vacate in the next few weeks
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Tuan_Jim »

When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.

Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1515
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Cap »

Gawd. Imagine if we had a fast six footer under 18 stone with long reach who could bob and weave under a jab and punch with major authority. He'd put an end to all these awkward giants. Unfortunately, it looks like lumbering giants from here on.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23177
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by mickey1975 »

Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.

Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14218
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Evander »

Filler in fight.
Active always help you, other than that out here no one cares.
I like Fury the man ... he's mad funny for me culturally.
Sometimes Fury is rude and obscene which he needs to get a handle on the global audience, but from geezer to geezer I get his humour. :wink:
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Sklar »

mickey1975 wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.

Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?
There are a couple of million reasons why that's different. They've taken the path of least resistance with Tyson and got him where they have. I understand why the purists complain about soft matchmaking but if they'd thrown him in with bangers would he be on the cusp of a title shot and the huge payday that goes with it?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23177
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by mickey1975 »

Sklar wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.

Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?
There are a couple of million reasons why that's different. They've taken the path of least resistance with Tyson and got him where they have. I understand why the purists complain about soft matchmaking but if they'd thrown him in with bangers would he be on the cusp of a title shot and the huge payday that goes with it?
Possibly, yes. He's got up to stop whoever put him down. Who are these huge bangers he should have been put in with? Please don't say Price because Fury's chin and heart are infinitely better than his. Price would lose that fight at the press conference.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by lillywhite14 »

There's a reason why he pulled out of the Price fight when it was ordered. Too much risk, not enough reward. The risk being getting knocked spark out. Can't blame him for that. Since then Price has been exposed to a degree ( plenty of us already knew his chin was weak ) but even now, when Fury would be a big favourite, it wouldn't happen ( he's not on the same level etc...oh and Hammer is? )

As mentioned above, it's savvy to only entertain a 'banger' when it's financially rewarding. Still doesn't ignore the fact they have yet to eye up a fight with a 'puncher'. I'm hoping it's a coincidence but it's unlikely to be. Tyson himself would fight anybody, of that I have no doubt. His team are a little 'safer' though.
Post Reply