Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13446
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by jameswilson »

Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
Come on. You're not in the business like expe is mate. Stop being a pretender.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by expe »

Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
Thought it was only if you win the world title? European title gets vacated if you fight for a world title, but the Commonwealth is only if you win it and I thought the British title was the same, Butler was still champion even after he won a world title. Jason Booth, Martin Murray, Paul Smith and Tony Bellew have all fought for world titles in recent years without losing the British title in the process.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by magnus »

I think Expe is right - sure it's only the EBU title that you have to vacate when challenging for a world belt.

This is a seriously good show. Credit to FW. Especially as he could conceivably finish the night with no world champs.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32972
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Boxerbeetle »

According to its Twitter account, B0xnati0n subscribers get a 10% discount on tickets for this one. Absolutely cracking deal, really considering going up there but my missus is playing hardball at the moment as doesn't want to be left home alone with the baby. Anyone know if it's OK to take a 14 month old boy into the arena with me? :witzend:
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Parson Cross »

Pretending to be what ? A fan ? The British title at LM has stagnated and now Liam's stepped up at last surely the times right to let someone else go for it ? If I've got the rule wrong it ain't a criminal offence Mr Wilson.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by expe »

Parson Cross wrote:Pretending to be what ? A fan ? The British title at LM has stagnated and now Liam's stepped up at last surely the times right to let someone else go for it ? If I've got the rule wrong it ain't a criminal offence Mr Wilson.
He was having a sarcastic dig at me, not you mate.

I think Liam should vacate, he's past domestic level now and there's a number of good young fighters coming through that could give us some great fights to watch while they fight over the belt to see who's good enough to make the next step. From his perspective he's one defence away from winning it outright and if he can keep hold of it, it's an obvious comeback route if he loses to Soro, so I understand why he wouldn't want to unless he has to.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13446
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by jameswilson »

We've basically got the classic case of me being blatantly sarcastic and thinking everyone would see that. And there's so much trust in me on the board that everyone doesn't realise I'm being sarcastic and is just staring and thinking 'this guy is a fu cking idiot.'
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Parson Cross »

I haven't got a fuckin clue what you're talking about !
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by JimJim2009 »

magnus wrote:I think Expe is right - sure it's only the EBU title that you have to vacate when challenging for a world belt.

This is a seriously good show. Credit to FW. Especially as he could conceivably finish the night with no world champs.
If it was on sky it would be ppv. Well done fwank, I hope his gambles pay off and he finishes the night with three world champs.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Counter-puncher »

jameswilson wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
Come on. You're not in the business like expe is mate. Stop being a pretender.
:lol: i got it
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Manchester Hitman »

This is classic FW
He's still the best in the business :OhYes:
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by keirw »

Excellent looking card, hope it all holds together.
If it does, I can't see sky doing anything that can beat it this year, not without an extra price tag at least.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by palooka »

Parson Cross wrote:I haven't got a fuckin clue what you're talking about !
:doh: I thought I was the thickest on here.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Parson Cross »

What does that mean ?
JWP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 141
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 12:11

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by JWP »

Of the 15 weight classes, 7 British Titles are currently vacant.



We prefer to enjoy alphabet intercontinental interim silver belts against argentinian no marks.

Apparently.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by pyenest77 »

Looks like soro is out. Someone called John Thompson drafted in as replacement.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23231
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by handsofstone »

pyenest77 wrote:Looks like soro is out. Someone called John Thompson drafted in as replacement.
John Thompson won the Boxcino LMW tournement on ESPN earlier in the year,he's a decent fighter,came into it as a late replacement and surprised me a couple of times,KO'd Brandon Adams in the final

Not as tough as Soro but i like this fight
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by JimJim2009 »

If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
Fortynineandout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Fortynineandout »

Print posters first - sign contracts later !

In truth won't detract too much from what should still be a great night of boxing.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Andrew »

So FW agreed and confirmed terms with Soros promoter but due to an internal dispute the fight is off. So yet again a fight announced which was not actually signed.

Can Thompson beat smith then ? Nothing on his record stands out except he got ko'd in 2 early last year. Actually fancied Soro to win so this may work out better for Smith and FW
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
They did the deal with Arum for the fight, he signed, Warren signed and Smith signed, obviously that was taken as the fight being agreed so they announced it. Appears that Arum never bothered to see if Soro was happy with the deal, which he wasn't. It's a contractual issue between Top Rank and Soro, if he won his contract would have been automatically extended and with Haymon likely sniffing around he didn't want that and some sort of dispute was going on between the two. That was rumoured last night and Thompson has been brought in today, so they sorted it out quickly.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by JimJim2009 »

expe wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
They did the deal with Arum for the fight, he signed, Warren signed and Smith signed, obviously that was taken as the fight being agreed so they announced it. Appears that Arum never bothered to see if Soro was happy with the deal, which he wasn't. It's a contractual issue between Top Rank and Soro, if he won his contract would have been automatically extended and with Haymon likely sniffing around he didn't want that and some sort of dispute was going on between the two. That was rumoured last night and Thompson has been brought in today, so they sorted it out quickly.
So like I said, the fight was never actually on.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by JimJim2009 »

Fortynineandout wrote:Print posters first - sign contracts later !

In truth won't detract too much from what should still be a great night of boxing.
Agreed, it makes no difference really although I hope the rest of the fights are actually signed.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by ElJefe »

I'll be honest I've never hear of John Thompson in my life. Beefy won't get a better chance to win a world title than against a guy with 6 KO's and no 12 round experience.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Not as good as the Soro fight HOWEVER Thompson isn't the worse guy Smith could have fought down the belt. He looked pretty good in the Boxcino stuff and was touted as being one to watch prior to the loss to Galarza. Been on TV in the states often enough to get a read on him if you've never seen him.
Post Reply