A very overrated boxer. None of the two belong with the true all time greats. They were just superstars boxers of their era. That's it.man wrote:oscar delahoya is definitely p4p 1oo. noelmersalsa wrote:Not top 100 p4p material. Strictly garbage!
doubt in my mind he belongs there. his
career record looks different from floyd's
because he went for the best at any point
in time. tremendous, fun-to-watch boxer.
Trinidad/DLH
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
It's a damn shame we don't talk of true all time greats like Eder Jofre, Wilfredo Gomez, Fighting Harada, Panama Al Brown, Miguel Canto, Freddie Miller, Jake LaMotta, Mike McCallum or Benny Lynch for crying out loud. Or talk of greats like Marco Antonio Barrera, Luis Manuel Rodriguez and Eusebio Pedroza. True all time greats.
We are going to argue about a fight that at first, was not a great fight for the billing. Second, NONE OF THE TWO WERE GREAT FIGHTERS. And third, we got the nerve to compared them with the truest of the truest? Give me a break
We are going to argue about a fight that at first, was not a great fight for the billing. Second, NONE OF THE TWO WERE GREAT FIGHTERS. And third, we got the nerve to compared them with the truest of the truest? Give me a break
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Did, Oscar sleep with your wife or something?
To not include DLH in a class with guys like Jofre, Barrera, Gomez, etc....that's mystifying to me.
I mean, when you're holding up Mike McCallum as an example of greatness as opposed to DLH, I......I just don't get it, I will admit.
To not include DLH in a class with guys like Jofre, Barrera, Gomez, etc....that's mystifying to me.
I mean, when you're holding up Mike McCallum as an example of greatness as opposed to DLH, I......I just don't get it, I will admit.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Who gives a shiit? Do we need Bert Sugar to tell us who is good? He's a fecking writer, his opinion is as valid as yours or mine, no more.elmersalsa wrote:Not on Bert Randolph Sugar's bookIKSRTFO wrote:elmersalsa wrote:None of the two were great fighters. I don't know why some people wasted their time rewatching that junk.
For all the hoopla and anticipation, this fight for me, is the second biggest junk ever behind Mayweather vs Pacman
You got to close the show with satisfaction. None of the two were what their supporters believed. Two waste of time boxers. Not top 100 p4p material. Strictly garbage!
DLH is definitely in most top 100s
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
He is/was a boxing expert. We aren't.Bobbyptsd wrote:Who gives a shiit? Do we need Bert Sugar to tell us who is good? He's a fecking writer, his opinion is as valid as yours or mine, no more.elmersalsa wrote:Not on Bert Randolph Sugar's bookIKSRTFO wrote:
DLH is definitely in most top 100s
Re: Trinidad/DLH
If you wanted to point out something a great trainer or fighter said, fine. But Bert Shugar was no more a "boxing expert" than anyone else sharing their view.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Oscar didn't do nothing special. Anybody that thinks that Tito or Oscar were great fighters, gotta be delusional, American biased or Puerto Rican.Bobbyptsd wrote:Did, Oscar sleep with your wife or something?![]()
To not include DLH in a class with guys like Jofre, Barrera, Gomez, etc....that's mystifying to me.
I mean, when you're holding up Mike McCallum as an example of greatness as opposed to DLH, I......I just don't get it, I will admit.
Mike McCallum was a true all time great. Watch him fight. You learn something
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
He knew more about boxing than the average Joe. That means, you and I.Bobbyptsd wrote:Sugar had opinions, like anyone else.
If you wanted to point out something a great trainer or fighter said, fine. But Bert Shugar was no more a "boxing expert" than anyone else sharing their view.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Well, what a convincing counter pointelmersalsa wrote:He knew more about boxing than the average Joe. That means, you and I.Bobbyptsd wrote:Sugar had opinions, like anyone else.
If you wanted to point out something a great trainer or fighter said, fine. But Bert Shugar was no more a "boxing expert" than anyone else sharing their view.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
elmersalsa wrote:Oscar didn't do nothing special.Bobbyptsd wrote:Did, Oscar sleep with your wife or something?![]()
To not include DLH in a class with guys like Jofre, Barrera, Gomez, etc....that's mystifying to me.
I mean, when you're holding up Mike McCallum as an example of greatness as opposed to DLH, I......I just don't get it, I will admit.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
If Oscar De la Hoya wasn't that great then you just negated one of Floyd's best wins over a faded "not so great" fighter.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
The other day, I put a post about the great career of the great Zurdo de Oro, Vicente Saldivar. A very dissatisfied and disappointing thread that should have went long. A guy, that was a true all time great. Very truly. I was very amazed that we didn't know much about this legend, FCOL. Now, that's a top 100 fighter!
Oscar, Tito nor Lennox Lewis are not in the same class of these guys:
Joe Brown
Carlos Ortiz
Manuel Ortiz
Eusebio Pedroza
Azumah Nelson
Jersey Joe Walcott
Packey McFarland
Jimmy Barry
Mike McCallum
Georges Carpentier
Jack "Kid" Berg
Guys that made a mark in boxing history. Oscar, Tito nor Lennox made a mark about nothing. There were just great business men, that capitalized in today's boxing economics. They were nothing to be awed about. I am more awed about Ken Buchanan or Harold Johnson or Nicolino Locche than those guys.
Oscar, Tito nor Lennox Lewis are not in the same class of these guys:
Joe Brown
Carlos Ortiz
Manuel Ortiz
Eusebio Pedroza
Azumah Nelson
Jersey Joe Walcott
Packey McFarland
Jimmy Barry
Mike McCallum
Georges Carpentier
Jack "Kid" Berg
Guys that made a mark in boxing history. Oscar, Tito nor Lennox made a mark about nothing. There were just great business men, that capitalized in today's boxing economics. They were nothing to be awed about. I am more awed about Ken Buchanan or Harold Johnson or Nicolino Locche than those guys.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Oscar, Tito and Lennox were the best of their time's and got some fantastic scalps and gave us some great fights, their is no doubt they were great fighters.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
No, they were not great p4p 100 fighters, palooka...That's a fallacy.palooka wrote:Oscar, Tito and Lennox were the best of their time's and got some fantastic scalps and gave us some great fights, their is no doubt they were great fighters.
There are plenty of fighters that were so good ahead of them, and they neither made the top 100 list in my view or Bert Randolph Sugar's view
They were just superstars in their right time.
Of Oscar DeLaHoya era, only these I consider them great:
Bernard Hopkins
Roy Jones, Jr.
Marco Antonio Barrera
Juan Manuel Marquez
Manny Pacquiao
Floyd Mayweather, Jr.
Ricardo "Finito" Lopez....They, in my view, make the top 100 p4p greats list.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
elmersalsa wrote:No, they were not great p4p 100 fighters, palooka...That's a fallacy.palooka wrote:Oscar, Tito and Lennox were the best of their time's and got some fantastic scalps and gave us some great fights, their is no doubt they were great fighters.
There are plenty of fighters that were so good ahead of them, and they neither made the top 100 list in my view or Bert Randolph Sugar's view
They were just superstars in their right time.
Of Oscar DeLaHoya era, only these I consider them great:
Bernard Hopkins
Roy Jones, Jr.
Marco Antonio Barrera
Juan Manuel Marquez
Manny Pacquiao
Floyd Mayweather, Jr.
Ricardo "Finito" Lopez....They, in my view, make the top 100 p4p greats list.
Both beat Whitaker. A faded Whitaker, yes but if you take those wins away from them, then you also have to be fair and take Floyd and Manny's wins over past their best scalps. Actually, Oscar beat a lot of the same guys Floyd did.
Beating Whitaker at any stage is impressive.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Oscar didn't beat the great Pernell Whitaker.
Tito beat AN OVER THE HILL great.
Both wins, not impressive enough to call them great.
Tito beat AN OVER THE HILL great.
Both wins, not impressive enough to call them great.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
elmersalsa wrote:Oscar didn't beat the great Pernell Whitaker.
Tito beat AN OVER THE HILL great.
Both wins, not impressive enough to call them great.
Then neither Floyd nor Manny beat DLH or Mosley because both were over the hill.
Re: Trinidad/DLH
i think you are plain and simple wrong.elmersalsa wrote:Oscar didn't do nothing special.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Neither Felix "Tito" Trinidad nor Lenmox Lewis...Let's not be American biased, please!man wrote:i think you are plain and simple wrong.elmersalsa wrote:Oscar didn't do nothing special.
I cannot see them better than these guys, either:
Michael Spinks
Luis Manuel Rodriguez
Mike Tyson
Holman Williams
Marcel Cerdan
Carlos Zarate
Barbados Joe Walcott
Ted "Kid" Lewis
Jack Britton
Maxie Rosenbloom
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Any guy that made as much money as ODLH, must be great.
For awhile, he was THE main event for boxing.
There were plenty of fighters who surpassed DLH in ring skills, but Oscar hasd a blend of talent and charisma that few in history could match.
It's really not a matter of whether or not he belongs with the absolute elites of all times. DLH was special and an undisputed HOFer.
For awhile, he was THE main event for boxing.
There were plenty of fighters who surpassed DLH in ring skills, but Oscar hasd a blend of talent and charisma that few in history could match.
It's really not a matter of whether or not he belongs with the absolute elites of all times. DLH was special and an undisputed HOFer.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Oscar DeLaHoya was a great businessman in boxing. A hall of fame boxer? yes
A top 100 great p4p? He came short in my view
A top 100 great p4p? He came short in my view
Re: Trinidad/DLH
i do not think this is a reasonableBobbyptsd wrote:But Bert Shugar was no more a "boxing expert" than anyone else sharing their view.
statement.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15181
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Trinidad/DLH
Sugar did not have Michael Spinks or Harold Johnson in his Top 100.
Yet he made room for Willie Ritchie, Rocky Graziano and Lew Jenkins in his top 100. Seriously.
However he was on TV and wore a cool hat. So was he a boxing expert? Tough call.
Yet he made room for Willie Ritchie, Rocky Graziano and Lew Jenkins in his top 100. Seriously.
However he was on TV and wore a cool hat. So was he a boxing expert? Tough call.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
He knew more than you and I, AlpAmbling Alp II wrote:Sugar did not have Michael Spinks or Harold Johnson in his Top 100.
Yet he made room for Willie Ritchie, Rocky Graziano and Lew Jenkins in his top 100. Seriously.
However he was on TV and wore a cool hat. So was he a boxing expert? Tough call.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15706
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Trinidad/DLH
There are plenty of great fighters that didn't make the top 100 cut. And they in my view were better than Oscar, Tito and The Lion:man wrote:i think you are plain and simple wrong.elmersalsa wrote:Oscar didn't do nothing special.
Nicolino Locche
Gene Fullmer
Jack Delaney
Duilio Loi
James Toney
Shane Mosley
Floyd Patterson
Tony Zale
Fidel La Barba
Lou Ambers
Baby Ariznendi
Erik Morales
Was they better than these guys? I doubt it.