Page 2 of 4
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 16:22
by Old bones Ian
Davey Moore won the light-middle title at 23 and in only his 9th fight, put together some good defenses until he got destroyed by Duran. Oddly enough he would stop Benitez after that fight, but was seen as shopworn after losing to Duran, he did get another title shot, but again beaten badly by the end of it. Finished by the time he was in his late 20's.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 16:49
by palooka
mickey1975 wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Bobby Vanzie wrapped it young after a few defeats. Don't know if that had anything to do with injuries or what?
Want he disillusioned by being unbelievably blatantly robbed vs graham earl twice?
No, he joined The Jehovas Witnesses.
Good for him.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 17:50
by chinny
Meldrick Taylor was damaged by his mid 20s
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 18:06
by reggaereggae
I was thinking about Richie Evatt and looked at his record.....I had no idea he had died... Jaysus....shocker
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 18:35
by veriton
david reid is the one that springs to mind, but francsico bojado was supposed to have been the next big thing before he crashed and burned.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 19:06
by reggaereggae
veriton wrote:david reid is the one that springs to mind, but francsico bojado was supposed to have been the next big thing before he crashed and burned.
David Reid is a good one.,I don't think you could consider Bojado to ever have been shot, he just never made the grade.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 02 Nov 2015, 19:23
by Counter-puncher
How old is Tyson Marquez? Pretty young to be as shot as he is, I'd say.
Segura, too. (interesting to compare them with a couple of their flyweight contemporaries, Pongsaklek, Sosa, Viloria. Styles either do or don't make for longevity, is a lesson shown by many of the fighters named on this thread)
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 00:58
by Taansend
Colin McMillan turned pro with a ton of hype and was expected (especially by me) to go on to great things. His loss to Robinson effectively ended his proper world title dreams.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 01:13
by Sklar
Riddick Bowe was shot to pieces by the age of 27. He was the same age as Fury is now when he fought Golota and had been a pro for more or less the same length of time. By the time he'd been a pro for as long as Joshua has now he'd fought Bert Cooper, Tyrell Biggs and Tony Tubbs.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 01:38
by Wales
mickey1975 wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:Bobby Vanzie wrapped it young after a few defeats. Don't know if that had anything to do with injuries or what?
Want he disillusioned by being unbelievably blatantly robbed vs graham earl twice?
No, he joined The Jehovas Witnesses.
No reason to stop boxing. Quit the drink and the gambling, ignore christmas and knock a few doors on a Sunday offering people a free magazine and you're in!
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 02:10
by forcefraser
Chuck Gardner was never the same after Bruno landed that bomb on him.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 05:55
by Stevieb8006
Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 06:31
by Coco
Stevieb8006 wrote:Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
I think he was with Bradford Boys in the amateurs, maybe that Yorkshire angle helped develop an Ingle style of boxing! In the pro's I am pretty sure Jack Trickett looked after him.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 06:37
by mickey1975
Coco wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
I think he was with Bradford Boys in the amateurs, maybe that Yorkshire angle helped develop an Ingle style of boxing! In the pro's I am pretty sure Jack Trickett looked after him.
Wasn't he Karmand Centre?
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 06:45
by semtexreilly
Joe frazier
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 06:49
by bigjack
Errol Christie made his debut in 82 and was losing by stoppage a lot by the late 80s
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 07:05
by Coco
mickey1975 wrote:Coco wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
I think he was with Bradford Boys in the amateurs, maybe that Yorkshire angle helped develop an Ingle style of boxing! In the pro's I am pretty sure Jack Trickett looked after him.
Wasn't he Karmand Centre?
I could be wrong, and I meant Jack Doughty not Jack Tricket!!
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 07:52
by Hinchy70
Derek Chisora? only 31, young for a heavyweight? looked absolutely dreadful last time out
![[icon_e_confused.gif] :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 08:15
by big lennox
johnswan1 wrote:G0mez wrote:Fernando Vargas
He's only 37 today, but was shot by 2005 aged about 27.
I reading about him rattling off 17 or 18 stoppages when he began, then got took the distance by Winky, then halted by Felix, Oscar, Mosely, Mayorga etc.
Oh yeah, that's the one I couldn't think of - Vargas is the most shot I have ever seen from a guy in his 20's. Seeing his final performance against Mayorga was like watching an old man.
I think the Trinidad fight came far too early for him and ruined him as a fighter. Trinidad did the same to David Reid, who was also never the same and 'shot' at a young age. Poor management there. Trinidad, like Golovkin now, wasa a beast below middleweight.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 08:29
by cocka09
Bernard Hopkins. Such a shame that a 49 year old man couldn't cut it with Krusher in his last outing.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 08:30
by Boxing Prospect
Counter-puncher wrote:How old is Tyson Marquez? Pretty young to be as shot as he is, I'd say.
Segura, too. (interesting to compare them with a couple of their flyweight contemporaries, Pongsaklek, Sosa, Viloria. Styles either do or don't make for longevity, is a lesson shown by many of the fighters named on this thread)
I'd have thought El Nica would have been ruined by Marquez following their second bout but he's looked good recently.
As for Marquez he's just 27 but a very old 27 as you suggested.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 08:39
by Counter-puncher
Boxing Prospect wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:How old is Tyson Marquez? Pretty young to be as shot as he is, I'd say.
Segura, too. (interesting to compare them with a couple of their flyweight contemporaries, Pongsaklek, Sosa, Viloria. Styles either do or don't make for longevity, is a lesson shown by many of the fighters named on this thread)
I'd have thought El Nica would have been ruined by Marquez following their second bout but he's looked good recently.
.
you mean Concepcion? maybe he's acquainted with Kid Galahad's brother or something (what a fvcking world, that I think and say that...)
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 08:45
by Boxing Prospect
Yeah Concepcion looked brilliant last time out, back to his aggressive and exciting beat...maybe was the move up that helped.
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 09:08
by mickey1975
Coco wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
I think he was with Bradford Boys in the amateurs, maybe that Yorkshire angle helped develop an Ingle style of boxing! In the pro's I am pretty sure Jack Trickett looked after him.
I checked and it was Karmand. What a remarkable group the 1990 boys club winners were...
Re: Fighters who were considered shot at a young age..
Posted: 03 Nov 2015, 09:10
by palooka
mickey1975 wrote:Coco wrote:Stevieb8006 wrote:Out of interest, could anyone tell me who trained Bobby vanzie? He was slick
I think he was with Bradford Boys in the amateurs, maybe that Yorkshire angle helped develop an Ingle style of boxing! In the pro's I am pretty sure Jack Trickett looked after him.
I checked and it was Karmand. What a remarkable group the 1990 boys club winners were...
Illuminate us, Mickey - Hamed, Gray, Lockett?