Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
on youtube now , Fury does not look in great shape to me whereas Klit looks in great nick as usual .
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Have you got a link bro?rd350lc wrote:on youtube now , Fury does not look in great shape to me whereas Klit looks in great nick as usual .
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
No, he didn't...johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.
Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
He refused the first handshake. Not the one after the stair down.MarkMcBurney wrote:No, he didn't...johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.
Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Ah my mistake then, I only watched the actual weigh in, and stare down.keithmoonhangover wrote:He refused the first handshake. Not the one after the stair down.MarkMcBurney wrote:No, he didn't...johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.
Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
Apologies.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Not seeing that at all. The difference between them in photos together has consistently been less than 3 inches too; many people exaggerate their heights and think Fury is guilty of that.I don't agree - Klitschko seems to be standing fully erect (boom boom) but Fury can definitely get another two inches if he had the same stance.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Nee botha mate.MarkMcBurney wrote:Apologies.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Bamboozled by that. Did Tyson have his shoes on during that staredown? I've stood in front of both of them and Fury appeared noticeably taller. Trainers can add a couple of inches. Fury is very light too, did they read his weight correctly - if so, I need to go on a diet sharpish.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Sklar wrote:Bamboozled by that. Did Tyson have his shoes on during that staredown? I've stood in front of both of them and Fury appeared noticeably taller. Trainers can add a couple of inches. Fury is very light too, did they read his weight correctly - if so, I need to go on a diet sharpish.

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Cheers. Wlad's shoes have significantly more elevation thsn Tyson's.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Doubt those runners would add much more than an inch..let alone cancel out the listed three inch difference.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Also, regarding the love handles that some have mentioned---I suspect that Fury could stand to lose some more flab, but it seems to me like he naturally has wide hips that flare out, giving the appearance of him being in worse shape than he likely is. Even in elite bodybuilding, where the competitors have extremely low body fat, you can see that some have this type of structure.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Correct.crusader wrote:Also, regarding the love handles that some have mentioned---I suspect that Fury could stand to lose some more flab, but it seems to me like he naturally has wide hips that flare out, giving the appearance of him being in worse shape than he likely is. Even in elite bodybuilding, where the competitors have extremely low body fat, you can see that some have this type of structure.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
The lighter weight he has come in at is probably down to him shrinking 3"
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I wonder if he boxes southpaw or orthodox.
I've got a feeling he's going to box southpaw on the back foot and work of his jab.
His footwork is very underrated and this tactic could possibly work if he can keep it up for the full 12.
I've got a feeling he's going to box southpaw on the back foot and work of his jab.
His footwork is very underrated and this tactic could possibly work if he can keep it up for the full 12.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
PredatorHayds wrote:I wonder if he boxes southpaw or orthodox.
I've got a feeling he's going to box southpaw on the back foot and work of his jab.
His footwork is very underrated and this tactic could possibly work if he can keep it up for the full 12.
I hope he doesn't shafted by the judges,if they are needed that is.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
He needs to steer clear of southpaw imo. It's ok against powder puff punching 6'2 plodding heavyweights with little ambition but this is a different kettle of fish. Stick to orthodox and set a good pace. Make Wlad work, all of course without getting too reckless
I hope he keeps his head and doesn't let the ocassion get the better of him. Its all new to him and he is a little excitable!
I hope he keeps his head and doesn't let the ocassion get the better of him. Its all new to him and he is a little excitable!
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
I agree.lillywhite14 wrote:He needs to steer clear of southpaw imo. It's ok against powder puff punching 6'2 plodding heavyweights with little ambition but this is a different kettle of fish. Stick to orthodox and set a good pace. Make Wlad work, all of course without getting too reckless
In fact as a Wlad fan I hope Fury comes out as a southpaw throwing those backhanded jabs. I think it's in Fury's best interest to try to get inside, be as busy as possible, hit and hold, and generally do what he can to wear down and tire out Wlad. I believe that some people, hopefully Fury's team as well, are overestimating his ability to outbox Wlad from a distance with cute jabs and footwork.
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Both guys look like they usually do, Fury looked quietly confident and Wlad does not appear worried whatsoever. Definitely respect from both guys, i reckon first couple rounds will be cagey.
This should be entertaining as soon as the first big shot lands.
This should be entertaining as soon as the first big shot lands.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
This is the first boxing match I've been bang up for since Vitali v Lewis.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32971
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Personally I do think this will be a virtual re-run of the Pulev fight, but should be great while it lasts.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
He actually looked smaller than wlad the face to face I thoughtdanamba7 wrote:According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Sklar wrote:This is the first boxing match I've been bang up for since Vitali v Lewis.
If its half as good as that we're in for a treat. Would be shocked to see the same level of quality or high levels of punishment in this fight mind. Neither of these chins on saturday could take that punishment in my opinion.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Klitschko wearing some sort of built-up trainers imo.
Fury definitely has a few inches on him.
Fury definitely has a few inches on him.
Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in
Which we know isn't the case so seems Wlad has bought some specialist shoesFinn wrote:He actually looked smaller than wlad the face to face I thoughtdanamba7 wrote:According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.