Klitschko-Fury weigh in

rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by rd350lc »

on youtube now , Fury does not look in great shape to me whereas Klit looks in great nick as usual .
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by reggaereggae »

rd350lc wrote:on youtube now , Fury does not look in great shape to me whereas Klit looks in great nick as usual .
Have you got a link bro?
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by MarkMcBurney »

johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.

Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
No, he didn't...
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.

Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
No, he didn't...
He refused the first handshake. Not the one after the stair down.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by MarkMcBurney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.

Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
No, he didn't...
He refused the first handshake. Not the one after the stair down.
Ah my mistake then, I only watched the actual weigh in, and stare down.

Apologies.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by crusader »

I don't agree - Klitschko seems to be standing fully erect (boom boom) but Fury can definitely get another two inches if he had the same stance.
Not seeing that at all. The difference between them in photos together has consistently been less than 3 inches too; many people exaggerate their heights and think Fury is guilty of that.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote:Apologies.
Nee botha mate. :TU:
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Sklar »

Bamboozled by that. Did Tyson have his shoes on during that staredown? I've stood in front of both of them and Fury appeared noticeably taller. Trainers can add a couple of inches. Fury is very light too, did they read his weight correctly - if so, I need to go on a diet sharpish.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by expe »

Sklar wrote:Bamboozled by that. Did Tyson have his shoes on during that staredown? I've stood in front of both of them and Fury appeared noticeably taller. Trainers can add a couple of inches. Fury is very light too, did they read his weight correctly - if so, I need to go on a diet sharpish.
Image
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Sklar »

Cheers. Wlad's shoes have significantly more elevation thsn Tyson's.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by crusader »

Doubt those runners would add much more than an inch..let alone cancel out the listed three inch difference.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by crusader »

Also, regarding the love handles that some have mentioned---I suspect that Fury could stand to lose some more flab, but it seems to me like he naturally has wide hips that flare out, giving the appearance of him being in worse shape than he likely is. Even in elite bodybuilding, where the competitors have extremely low body fat, you can see that some have this type of structure.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Sklar »

crusader wrote:Also, regarding the love handles that some have mentioned---I suspect that Fury could stand to lose some more flab, but it seems to me like he naturally has wide hips that flare out, giving the appearance of him being in worse shape than he likely is. Even in elite bodybuilding, where the competitors have extremely low body fat, you can see that some have this type of structure.
Correct.
thechamp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 63
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 18:21

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by thechamp »

The lighter weight he has come in at is probably down to him shrinking 3"
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by PredatorHayds »

I wonder if he boxes southpaw or orthodox.
I've got a feeling he's going to box southpaw on the back foot and work of his jab.
His footwork is very underrated and this tactic could possibly work if he can keep it up for the full 12.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by bigjack »

PredatorHayds wrote:I wonder if he boxes southpaw or orthodox.
I've got a feeling he's going to box southpaw on the back foot and work of his jab.
His footwork is very underrated and this tactic could possibly work if he can keep it up for the full 12.

I hope he doesn't shafted by the judges,if they are needed that is.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by lillywhite14 »

He needs to steer clear of southpaw imo. It's ok against powder puff punching 6'2 plodding heavyweights with little ambition but this is a different kettle of fish. Stick to orthodox and set a good pace. Make Wlad work, all of course without getting too reckless

I hope he keeps his head and doesn't let the ocassion get the better of him. Its all new to him and he is a little excitable!
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by crusader »

lillywhite14 wrote:He needs to steer clear of southpaw imo. It's ok against powder puff punching 6'2 plodding heavyweights with little ambition but this is a different kettle of fish. Stick to orthodox and set a good pace. Make Wlad work, all of course without getting too reckless
I agree.

In fact as a Wlad fan I hope Fury comes out as a southpaw throwing those backhanded jabs. I think it's in Fury's best interest to try to get inside, be as busy as possible, hit and hold, and generally do what he can to wear down and tire out Wlad. I believe that some people, hopefully Fury's team as well, are overestimating his ability to outbox Wlad from a distance with cute jabs and footwork.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Monte Fisto »

Both guys look like they usually do, Fury looked quietly confident and Wlad does not appear worried whatsoever. Definitely respect from both guys, i reckon first couple rounds will be cagey.

This should be entertaining as soon as the first big shot lands.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Sklar »

This is the first boxing match I've been bang up for since Vitali v Lewis.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32971
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Personally I do think this will be a virtual re-run of the Pulev fight, but should be great while it lasts.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Finn »

danamba7 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
He actually looked smaller than wlad the face to face I thought
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Monte Fisto »

Sklar wrote:This is the first boxing match I've been bang up for since Vitali v Lewis.

If its half as good as that we're in for a treat. Would be shocked to see the same level of quality or high levels of punishment in this fight mind. Neither of these chins on saturday could take that punishment in my opinion.
jamiem26
Super Welterweight
Posts: 169
Joined: 17 Nov 2014, 19:38

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by jamiem26 »

Klitschko wearing some sort of built-up trainers imo.

Fury definitely has a few inches on him.
jamiem26
Super Welterweight
Posts: 169
Joined: 17 Nov 2014, 19:38

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by jamiem26 »

Finn wrote:
danamba7 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
He actually looked smaller than wlad the face to face I thought
Which we know isn't the case so seems Wlad has bought some specialist shoes :lol:
Post Reply