Klitschko-Fury weigh in

johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by johnswan1 »

Not open to the public but live on Sky now. Fury looks in great shape, the best he's been in I'd say, wonder what weight he'll come in at.

Fury refused a handshake and looks a little wound up.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by johnswan1 »

Fury 17 stone 8 lbs, 112kg, 247 lbs.

Wlad 17 stone 7 lbs 111.5kg, 246 lbs.
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Benelio »

Wow! That's super light for Tyson. Was expecting at least 18st
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by johnswan1 »

Couldn't see whether one or both were wearing shoes but Wlad actually looked a cm or so taller in the head to head.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by SteveDow »

Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by stevedoc »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
he must be looking for speed , a good weight for fury i think
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by expe »

SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
I think he's come in lighter because he's trained properly for the fight and hasn't cut corners, rather than as part of any gameplan.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by bigjack »

stevedoc wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
he must be looking for speed , a good weight for fury i think

I think that's a cracking weight for Tyson,he's obviously trained very hard for this and i'm so looking forward to it now :box:
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by danamba7 »

SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by expe »

danamba7 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by bigjack »

anyone got a link for this ? please .
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by danamba7 »

expe wrote:
danamba7 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:Interesting the point Froch made about Fury possibly coming in lighter so he could look to box and move. Not sure that'll work. Also there looked to be no height difference at all.
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.
Image

Both seem to be standing tall in this image. Seems to be a pretty straight photo as apposed to at an angle too.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Tuan_Jim »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Klitschko might be wearing Hollywood-style lifts on his heels in order to try and diminish the size difference. If he is, he must be the first 6'6'' man in history to wear such an accoutrement.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by keithmoonhangover »

johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by bigjack »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?

that's what i was thinking,being lighter is more likely to help him avoid getting clipped in the first place,can't see how it would effect the chin department.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?
Maybe because he's at a weight that he's not really accustomed to.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by bigjack »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.



most of the 80s heavies were flabby and they were more than capable of doing 12 or 15 rounds,i wouldn't read too much into that .
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by reggaereggae »

danamba7 wrote:
expe wrote:
danamba7 wrote:
According to Boxrec, Fury is 6ft9 and Wlad 6ft6. No way is there a 3 inch difference. Fury must be 6ft7 tops.
Tyson slouches, Wlad stands his full height, I wouldn't be surprised if there is 3 inches between them, there's been a bigger difference in photos before than there was at the weigh in today.
Image

Both seem to be standing tall in this image. Seems to be a pretty straight photo as apposed to at an angle too.
I don't agree - Klitschko seems to be standing fully erect (boom boom) but Fury can definitely get another two inches if he had the same stance.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by keithmoonhangover »

bigjack wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:Fury looks in great shape
No. Wlad looks in great shape. Fury looks in decent shape. Great shape is not having love handles and Fury still has them.



most of the 80s heavies were flabby and they were more than capable of doing 12 or 15 rounds,i wouldn't read too much into that .
In their prime, how many of the all time greats had love handles?

Johnson? Dempsey? Louis? Marciano? Ali? Not a love handle in sight. Hmmm.
Aaronide_ger
Super Welterweight
Posts: 595
Joined: 13 Sep 2014, 10:01

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Aaronide_ger »

I give Fury a 30%-35% chance to upset Wladimir... I hope it happens we need a change in the heavyweight division. Fury is the man to do it!
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Tuan_Jim »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Surprising that he's come in so low. Why give away the weight advantage so much, especially as it could weaken his whiskers a bit
How does having excess fat around the midriff enforce the jawbone?
Maybe because he's at a weight that he's not really accustomed to.
I see what you mean, but I think punch resistance can only be impaired by a lighter weight if a fighter is weight drained, which he can hardly be at nearly 18 stone. And as bigjack said, he's more likely to be nimble and keep the chin out of harm's way at a more mobile weight.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by Tuan_Jim »

WAR FURY RUMBLING IN MY BOWELS
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17116
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Klitschko-Fury weigh in

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Tuan_Jim wrote:WAR FURY RUMBLING IN MY BOWELS
That's because you're full sh1t.
Post Reply