Tyson Fury

expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by expe »

thechump wrote:
expe wrote:
thechump wrote: You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clowns
He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.
Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard on :TU:
Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a fornicating clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by palooka »

Povetkin will wreck Wilder, Wilder would not have faced Wlad. Fury can be a dick but is by far the better boxer (than Wilder). Wilder has serious power and gets strange angles.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

expe wrote:
thechump wrote:
expe wrote: He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.
Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard on :TU:
Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?
Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
thechump wrote:
FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
Wilder is shockingly bad at boxing for a world champion . Fury would embarrass Wilder. Give him an absolute schooling. You get mongs saying Wilder is athletic and Fury is ungainly when Fury is a far better mover than Wilder. Wilder has garbage footwork and he's clumsy as hell. He's nothing more than a windmill with a hard punch. People probably think he's a good boxer because he has the black and slick look. Fvckin idiots.
You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clowns
So who is the better boxer in your opinion Fury or Wilder?
The answer will determine my opinion of you which right now is not good.
Hahaha who the fvck are the headteacher ina school or something haha behave will ya with the "your answer will determine what i think of you" hahaha but for the record fury is a better boxer than wilder but in your opinikn who hits harder wilder or fury? Your answer will determine what i think of you and for the record it isnt very good atm
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by magwitch »

palooka wrote:
lefty wrote:Now there's rumours all over twitter that not only did security have to seperate them but that Froch basically legged it aswell! Now I don't know whether to believe that or not lol. To be fair though, whatever the circumstances, Fury is a lot bigger than Froch.
:TU: glad to see you back pal.

I can't see Froch legging it, he's game enough. I can remember reading about Jason Rowland squaring up to Clifton Mitchell over something or other - some people are just game to the core.
Presumably these two know each other very well having boxed under the same promoter. I expect it (if "it" actually existed) was just silliness. Carl can look after himself ably there. Probably at the cost of a broken hand.
No way either man is dumb enough to throw the first punch. A rumour not worth propagating.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by expe »

thechump wrote:
expe wrote:
thechump wrote: Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard on :TU:
Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?
Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?
Find me a class boxer that doesn't have good movement and feints. There's more to being a good boxer than just throwing punches.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

expe wrote:
thechump wrote:
expe wrote: Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?
Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?
Find me a class boxer that doesn't have good movement and feints. There's more to being a good boxer than just throwing punches.
So the answer is "yes chump i agree"
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Sooner or later they will have to put Wilder in with someone decent. And when they do he loses.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Counter-puncher »

I've heard it all now. He isn't a good boxer. He just uses movement and feints well. The two being mutually fookin exclusive of course. Fucken stroll on.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

Counter-puncher wrote:I've heard it all now. He isn't a good boxer. He just uses movement and feints well. The two being mutually fookin exclusive of course. Fucken stroll on.
These two are also used in dance and ballet,u fuckin stroll on,its a boxing fvckin forum not a fury d1ck suckin site u mug
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
thechump wrote:
FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
So who is the better boxer in your opinion Fury or Wilder?
The answer will determine my opinion of you which right now is not good.
Hahaha who the fvck are the headteacher ina school or something haha behave will ya with the "your answer will determine what i think of you" hahaha but for the record fury is a better boxer than wilder but in your opinikn who hits harder wilder or fury? Your answer will determine what i think of you and for the record it isnt very good atm
You get a pass. The equivalent of a Silver star at a special needs school type of pass.

Wilder hits harder.
Aww cheers. You also get a pass so we will give u a rusk for being a very clever boy (clap clap clap) well done
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Horse »

Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:
lefty wrote:Now there's rumours all over twitter that not only did security have to seperate them but that Froch basically legged it aswell! Now I don't know whether to believe that or not lol. To be fair though, whatever the circumstances, Fury is a lot bigger than Froch.
:TU: glad to see you back pal.

I can't see Froch legging it, he's game enough. I can remember reading about Jason Rowland squaring up to Clifton Mitchell over something or other - some people are just game to the core.
Yeah, like palooka said welcome back mate. :TU: I was going to have a break from posting on here, but now you're back on, I might stay.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by rd350lc »

Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
it's a forum is it not ? are people not allowed to have opinions that differ from yours ?
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
HEY....horse im.not anti fury but cmon that was terrible last night he made an absolute tit of himself and the world was lookin on probably thinkin the same as everyone but u tyson fury nuthuggers,what an absolute d1ckhead.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by expe »

Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Rexob »

thechump wrote:
Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
HEY....horse im.not anti fury but cmon that was terrible last night he made an absolute tit of himself and the world was lookin on probably thinkin the same as everyone but u tyson fury nuthuggers,what an absolute d1ckhead.

Take it for what it is nothing more :TU:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
thechump wrote:
FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
You get a pass. The equivalent of a Silver star at a special needs school type of pass.

Wilder hits harder.
Aww cheers. You also get a pass so we will give u a rusk for being a very clever boy (clap clap clap) well done
A rusk :lol:

That was quite funny for a guy who clearly knows fvck all about boxing. I suspect you might be trolling a bit because some of your opinions are just to ridiculous to comprehend. Using intelligent movement and faints against an 11 year undefeated ATG heavyweight does not equate to class boxing :doh: Good luck with that one chump :lol:
Yo frozenmixedveg think u need to thaw out abit ur brains still frozen, wlad was champ for 9 years not 11 he won the ibf in 2006 lost it in 2015 unless the nabf is now a version of the world title and imo fury will lose the rematch but like i always say its just an opinion so ppl dont get all angry and frustrated its a forum is it not???
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

expe wrote:
Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.
Whatever expo your not the god of boxing forum everyone has an opinion so deal with it,its not life or death so chill ye :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.
It's bad either way.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by rd350lc »

FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?

They are a waste of time.
it's a forum is it not ? are people not allowed to have opinions that differ from yours ?
Well let him have his opinion then.
His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by TheGman »

You all shud just make a post with fury fans only then we will all know not to comment on it cause our oponion wont count in all u fury sausage jockeys eyes ;-)
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Boxerbeetle »

expe wrote:
thechump wrote: You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clowns
He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.
True, although he also landed less than 100 punches in 12 rounds, so let's not get too carried away with either of them just yet.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by Horse »

rd350lc wrote:His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .
Some opinions do not deserve respect.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
rd350lc wrote:His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .
Some opinions do not deserve respect.
Errr.... like yours. :TU:
Post Reply