BoxRec

Horse wrote:

thechump wrote:Why do u come on here disrespecting people? Do u even know anything about boxing apart from who kell brook is?

It's disrespectful to Kell Brook to suggest that someone like Liam Smith might beat him.

Liam Smith wasn't even a credible British champion. He never beat a British level fighter for that title.

I'm sick of the hype for that guy on here.

thechump wrote:Liam smith would smash kells other cheek bone and fold him like a deck chair simple as now stop talkin horse sh1t

Horse wrote:

thechump wrote:Liam smith would smash kells other cheek bone and fold him like a deck chair simple as now stop talkin horse sh1t

Liam Smith is a bum.

By far the worst of the Smith brothers.

thechump wrote:

Horse wrote:

thechump wrote:Why do u come on here disrespecting people? Do u even know anything about boxing apart from who kell brook is?

It's disrespectful to Kell Brook to suggest that someone like Liam Smith might beat him.

Liam Smith wasn't even a credible British champion. He never beat a British level fighter for that title.

I'm sick of the hype for that guy on here.

Liam smith would smash kells other cheek bone and fold him like a deck chair simple as now stop talkin horse sh1t

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

thechump wrote:

Horse wrote:It's disrespectful to Kell Brook to suggest that someone like Liam Smith might beat him.

Liam Smith wasn't even a credible British champion. He never beat a British level fighter for that title.

I'm sick of the hype for that guy on here.

Liam smith would smash kells other cheek bone and fold him like a deck chair simple as now stop talkin horse sh1t

Really, he isn't much of a puncher, so what makes you think that?

I'd favour Brook, just, if they fought, I think he has more wrinkles to his game, and has far better footwork.

thechump wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

thechump wrote: Liam smith would smash kells other cheek bone and fold him like a deck chair simple as now stop talkin horse sh1t

Really, he isn't much of a puncher, so what makes you think that?

I'd favour Brook, just, if they fought, I think he has more wrinkles to his game, and has far better footwork.

Im just getting under the guy with the long face's skin. If im serious ye id pick kell by late stoppage or wide decision,too skillful and i think liam would walk onto uppercuts and hooks all night long

Wrists wrote:Levels.

Smith is a good fighter, brook very good.

Brook late stoppage

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

thechump wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Really, he isn't much of a puncher, so what makes you think that?

I'd favour Brook, just, if they fought, I think he has more wrinkles to his game, and has far better footwork.

Im just getting under the guy with the long face's skin. If im serious ye id pick kell by late stoppage or wide decision,too skillful and i think liam would walk onto uppercuts and hooks all night long

Oh...right, I get it, I think. Not sure it's worth bothering to get under his skin like that mate, especisally when you think almost the polar opposite.

Syntax Error wrote:It's amazing what a defeat can do for you.

Prior to having his face broken by Golovkin, Brook couldn't get a fight on a games console; now, all of a sudden, everyone from Conelo to my next door neighbour's cat is open to fighting him!

Kell needs to lose more often: he'd be a very rich man indeed!