Re: Who`'s LH's true #1
Posted: 21 Nov 2016, 11:51
Nobody is expecting Kovalev to somehow get 0 on paper again, but overwhelming majority of hardcore fans will have it in their minds.
And yet, even in their minds they would still be wrong. Clear cut case of denial, not sure what it's called if you can't even be honest in a fantasy but it sounds serious.boxing_rocks wrote:Nobody is expecting Kovalev to somehow get 0 on paper again, but overwhelming majority of hardcore fans will have it in their minds.
..lemme guess...same location? same night? nevada judges? must be a coincidenceSFW wrote:And yet, even in their minds they would still be wrong. Clear cut case of denial, not sure what it's called if you can't even be honest in a fantasy but it sounds serious.boxing_rocks wrote:Nobody is expecting Kovalev to somehow get 0 on paper again, but overwhelming majority of hardcore fans will have it in their minds.
This wasn't even the most controversial scoring ON THE NIGHT! Much less lolololol "a robbery". But the way it played out is certainly funny.
..you are right...however, it's not about who said what prior to the fight, it's about the quality of officiating in high profile cases...Keko wrote:Many said Kovalev KO but obviously not good enough to do it.
Not to work out how they planned.
greg wrote:..you are right...however, it's not about who said what prior to the fight, it's about the quality of officiating in high profile cases...Keko wrote:Many said Kovalev KO but obviously not good enough to do it.
Not to work out how they planned.
...props to both fighters..they did their best..Keko wrote:greg wrote:..you are right...however, it's not about who said what prior to the fight, it's about the quality of officiating in high profile cases...Keko wrote:Many said Kovalev KO but obviously not good enough to do it.
Not to work out how they planned.
Kovalev is great fighter for me but obviously can not be both KO finish Ward and actually the second part of the fight was worse. The first part was excellent.
Kovalev was a lot physically stronger and therefore I say and Ward should be applauded. A lot of them avoid such a fight and he took it and honestly did.
I agree for both.greg wrote:...props to both fighters..they did their best..Keko wrote:greg wrote: ..you are right...however, it's not about who said what prior to the fight, it's about the quality of officiating in high profile cases...
Kovalev is great fighter for me but obviously can not be both KO finish Ward and actually the second part of the fight was worse. The first part was excellent.
Kovalev was a lot physically stronger and therefore I say and Ward should be applauded. A lot of them avoid such a fight and he took it and honestly did.
trueKeko wrote:greg wrote:..you are right...however, it's not about who said what prior to the fight, it's about the quality of officiating in high profile cases...Keko wrote:Many said Kovalev KO but obviously not good enough to do it.
Not to work out how they planned.
Kovalev is great fighter for me but obviously can not be both KO finish Ward and actually the second part of the fight was worse. The first part was excellent.
Kovalev was a lot physically stronger and therefore I say and Ward should be applauded. A lot of them avoid such a fight and he took it and honestly did.