Re: Broner is Good For Boxing
Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 11:29
He's a solid gold cùnt flap no doubt but folk will watch just to see him get his face stoved in. I've never liked the guy. He's an odious little cretin but on form he's a talent.
that pretty much sums it up...chinarich wrote:Broner may have talent but he is lazy, undisciplined - three times he has failed to make weight when titles have been on the line, which to me is an unacceptable number - and comes across as a vulgar street thug...
I agree but Canelo opponents where on a higher level. Broner and Floyd deserve flak for overhyped to a point. GGG there a lot of guys who are great but even still overhyped and Broner, Floyd, Canelo, GGG all fall under that for me.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:PDL yes, but I thought Broner sealed his win in the 12th against Taylor.world ranked wrote:But should he be though Taylor, Ponce & the guy he just fought all can make case they beat him.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:He comes forward and throws punches in most of his fights.
His fight against Maidana was one of the best fights in recent memory because of both of their great efforts.
Stunk it up against Porter and PDL.
Still undefeated under 147.
Haven't watched the Granados fight yet. But if the fan scoring was like Broner's other fights ... I'm sure he won that fight too.
Crazy how some guys close fights hang over their head forever.
IMO, Canelo didn't beat Lara or Trout, or both fights were just as close as Taylor/Broner.
Yet, the only thing we hear is GGG/Canelo.
When it comes to guys like Broner and Floyd, asterisk start flying everywhere.