Page 2 of 2
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 17:47
by punchoutsb
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Ossyrules wrote:BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight didn't happen at 140 because Bradley got offered a path to Manny.
At 140, Bradley was waaaaaaay too rough for Khan.
The Maidana who couldn't jab barely lost to Khan, even after suffering a KD.
Bradley has nothing to prove against a fighter at Khan's level.
Amir Khan has never challenged himself at 147.
He's considered good because he was good at 140 from 7/2009 to 7/2012.
That stretch is in the middle of a KO sandwich and a loss to Peterson.
Never fought anyone at 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.
What a fraud.
Well he fought Garcia at 140, so that last statement is shite! Throw in maidiana and Peterson and you have another 2 close to garcias level.
Thanks, I meant he never fought any after 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.
Canelo was a cash out.
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 18:04
by Oiky
Good fight
Bradley would win
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 18:07
by hagler81
You see this fight doesn't interest me. Both fighters are no longer exciting. Khan was. Khan will lose as he does when he meets quality.
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 26 Apr 2017, 20:15
by Lackeos
Ossyrules wrote:BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight didn't happen at 140 because Bradley got offered a path to Manny.
At 140, Bradley was waaaaaaay too rough for Khan.
The Maidana who couldn't jab barely lost to Khan, even after suffering a KD.
Bradley has nothing to prove against a fighter at Khan's level.
Amir Khan has never challenged himself at 147.
He's considered good because he was good at 140 from 7/2009 to 7/2012.
That stretch is in the middle of a KO sandwich and a loss to Peterson.
Never fought anyone at 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.
What a fraud.
Well he fought Garcia at 140, so that last statement is shite! Throw in maidiana and Peterson and you have another 2 close to garcias level.
Uh... I dunno. Bad Intentions might be right. Danny Garcia might not be anywhere close to Danny Garcia's level.
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 27 Apr 2017, 20:30
by verlichte
in regards to the thread title, this fight isn't going to happen... EVER! So it's a pointless thread.
Re: Khan vs. Bradley
Posted: 05 May 2018, 10:15
by sniperpork
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑24 Apr 2017, 11:40
Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
bradley already retire after he fought manny pacquiao for the third time in 2016