Khan vs. Bradley

NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Khan vs. Bradley

Post by NateJR »

At one time this was one of the biggest fights to made in boxing. Both guys were the guys to beat in the 140 lb division and every boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. I personally think now is a great opportunity for them to finally meet in ring, both guys have been sitting on the shelf for too long and I still think this fight creates some buzz and has the potential to be a good competitive scrap. Not what it would have been 5 years ago, but I believe they can both still perform at a high enough level to give the fans their money's worth.

I think it's a fight they could both make some decent money in as well, so I really don't see why this couldn't get made or much less why it shouldn't get made. If I remember right there was a bit of bad blood between the 2 as well.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Stuarty »

Decent fight. Makes sense.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Tanzio »

Nice fight. Doubt either are looking for that sized prize at this time though. Khan should be all over it. Probably the highest level fight where he is not made to do a Bambi On Ice act.

I wouldn't mind Porter v either of these two.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by boxing_rocks »

Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Stuarty »

Tanzio wrote:Nice fight. Doubt either are looking for that sized prize at this time though. Khan should be all over it. Probably the highest level fight where he is not made to do a Bambi On Ice act.

I wouldn't mind Porter v either of these two.
Porter v Bradley would be a fun fight. Wouldn't mind seeing Porter chin Khan as well :TU:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by boxing_rocks »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Nice fight. Doubt either are looking for that sized prize at this time though. Khan should be all over it. Probably the highest level fight where he is not made to do a Bambi On Ice act.

I wouldn't mind Porter v either of these two.
Porter v Bradley would be a fun fight.
That could be a death sentence for Tim. He already had brain damage after Provo fight.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Tanzio »

boxing_rocks wrote:Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
Not sure, but he has been blessed with three Manny paydays and by all appearances he is a frugal family man. Ramming Speed likely needs not return except for the fight he wants.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46390
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by gilgamesh »

I don't remember a time when every Boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. It's a fight that would've always been good and interesting though, and it still is.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Crease »

gilgamesh wrote:I don't remember a time when every Boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. It's a fight that would've always been good and interesting though, and it still is.
Waaayyyyy back in 2011 - Bradley beat Alexander for the WBC & WBO titles... Amir Khan held the WBA & IBF belts when he defeated Zab Judah.
A Bradley vs Kahn showdown then would have literally been for all of the marbles.

:TU:
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by boxing_rocks »

Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
Not sure, but he has been blessed with three Manny paydays and by all appearances he is a frugal family man. Ramming Speed likely needs not return except for the fight he wants.
Yep, he seems to be a nice guy. No need for further damage. I remember there was a talk about him fighting Canelo, and I saw him saying that he would fight GGG. Good thing he didn't fight any of them.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Tanzio »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
Not sure, but he has been blessed with three Manny paydays and by all appearances he is a frugal family man. Ramming Speed likely needs not return except for the fight he wants.
Yep, he seems to be a nice guy. No need for further damage. I remember there was a talk about him fighting Canelo, and I saw him saying that he would fight GGG. Good thing he didn't fight any of them.
I agree. He has the heart of a wolverine.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46390
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by gilgamesh »

Crease wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I don't remember a time when every Boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. It's a fight that would've always been good and interesting though, and it still is.
Waaayyyyy back in 2011 - Bradley beat Alexander for the WBC & WBO titles... Amir Khan held the WBA & IBF belts when he defeated Zab Judah.
A Bradley vs Kahn showdown then would have literally been for all of the marbles.

:TU:
Yeah I remember that. I still don't remember everybody calling for that fight or being all that eager to see it. It was a hell of a good fight to make then, and it'd still be a good fight to make now.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by IKSRTFO »

boxing_rocks wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Tanzio wrote:Nice fight. Doubt either are looking for that sized prize at this time though. Khan should be all over it. Probably the highest level fight where he is not made to do a Bambi On Ice act.

I wouldn't mind Porter v either of these two.
Porter v Bradley would be a fun fight.
That could be a death sentence for Tim. He already had brain damage after Provo fight.
Between the two, I would count on Khan having more brain damage than Bradley.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by IKSRTFO »

gilgamesh wrote:I don't remember a time when every Boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. It's a fight that would've always been good and interesting though, and it still is.
It was hot at 140
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Ossyrules »

I agree it would have been a really good big fight. Both seemed to slide up to 147 and missed a trick not sorting out 140 between them.

If it happened then, I give khanthe edge in the "boxing", but Bradley was the tougher warrior here and if it became a bit of a dog fight for want of a better word, it's Bradley's fight. Tough call

Now, no idea what level Bradley is still at tbh. Or Khan really
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Kalan »

I don't like the fight at all... I see them both as light hitting duckers and this is another non-threatening match-up where they wouldn't get hurt... Spence, Brook, Thurman, Porter, or Garcia for the both of them -- and for Pacquiao too... The little tyke has been ducking big banging Welterweights for years.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boxing_rocks wrote:Is Bradley promoted by Arum? Why hasn't he fought for over a year and has nothing scheduled?
He was interested in cotto late last year, when that didn't happen he wanted the break. Say what you will about arum, he's done great by Bradley.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46390
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by gilgamesh »

Kalan wrote:I don't like the fight at all... I see them both as light hitting duckers and this is another non-threatening match-up where they wouldn't get hurt... Spence, Brook, Thurman, Porter, or Garcia for the both of them -- and for Pacquiao too... The little tyke has been ducking big banging Welterweights for years.
Khan's last fight was Canelo, Bradley's last fight was Pacquiao...and they're duckers? Can't say I agree with that.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Lackeos »

My preference would be for Bradley to fight a world class welterweight like Thurman / Garcia / Brook and for Khan to fight someone just below that level like Vargas or Broner.
gilgamesh wrote:I don't remember a time when every Boxing fan was clamoring for this fight. It's a fight that would've always been good and interesting though, and it still is.
Back in 2010, the top 4 light welterweights were Bradley, Khan, Maidana, and Alexander. There were lots of posts / threads stating that people wanted a tournament with these four. Then Bradley fought Alexander and Khan fought Maidana. Then people really wanted to see Bradley - Khan. That lasted until Khan lost to Peterson.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Fight didn't happen at 140 because Bradley got offered a path to Manny.
At 140, Bradley was waaaaaaay too rough for Khan.
The Maidana who couldn't jab barely lost to Khan, even after suffering a KD.

Bradley has nothing to prove against a fighter at Khan's level.
Amir Khan has never challenged himself at 147.
He's considered good because he was good at 140 from 7/2009 to 7/2012.
That stretch is in the middle of a KO sandwich and a loss to Peterson.

Never fought anyone at 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.

What a fraud.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Ossyrules »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight didn't happen at 140 because Bradley got offered a path to Manny.
At 140, Bradley was waaaaaaay too rough for Khan.
The Maidana who couldn't jab barely lost to Khan, even after suffering a KD.

Bradley has nothing to prove against a fighter at Khan's level.
Amir Khan has never challenged himself at 147.
He's considered good because he was good at 140 from 7/2009 to 7/2012.
That stretch is in the middle of a KO sandwich and a loss to Peterson.

Never fought anyone at 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.

What a fraud.
Well he fought Garcia at 140, so that last statement is shite! Throw in maidiana and Peterson and you have another 2 close to garcias level.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Badhusker »

This fight is pretty much the only high profile fight Khan could take aside from Broner where he may see the end of the 12th round since Bradley is not a big puncher. Other than that, Jesse Vargas or J Lopez would be decent too. Khan's options are very limited.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9009
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Syntax Error »

Good call.

Bradley is much better skilled than Khan, but he can't punch & Khan loves opponents that can't punch.

Khan is also faster than Bradley (although Bradley is no slouch) & could pose great problems for Timothy.

I'd still go with Bradley on account of the fact that he's better, but it wouldn't surprise if Khan pulled an upset.
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by Ossyrules »

Syntax Error wrote:Good call.

Bradley is much better skilled than Khan, but he can't punch & Khan loves opponents that can't punch.

Khan is also faster than Bradley (although Bradley is no slouch) & could pose great problems for Timothy.

I'd still go with Bradley on account of the fact that he's better, but it wouldn't surprise if Khan pulled an upset.
I don't consider Bradley much more skilled, if anything I favour Khan in that area, but physically aside speed Bradley has Khan covered imo
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Khan vs. Bradley

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Ossyrules wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Fight didn't happen at 140 because Bradley got offered a path to Manny.
At 140, Bradley was waaaaaaay too rough for Khan.
The Maidana who couldn't jab barely lost to Khan, even after suffering a KD.

Bradley has nothing to prove against a fighter at Khan's level.
Amir Khan has never challenged himself at 147.
He's considered good because he was good at 140 from 7/2009 to 7/2012.
That stretch is in the middle of a KO sandwich and a loss to Peterson.

Never fought anyone at 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.

What a fraud.
Well he fought Garcia at 140, so that last statement is shite! Throw in maidiana and Peterson and you have another 2 close to garcias level.
Thanks, I meant he never fought any after 140 close to Danny Garcia's level.

Canelo was a cash out.
Post Reply