Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by skanksta »

BitPlayer wrote:
skanksta wrote:
banjo wrote:
Yep because he's a bloke she's a bird
.

For woman vs man fights to be fair - the woman must outweigh the man by a minimum of 40%.
Realistically that's a 12 stone woman vs a Super-Bantam. Laila Ali vs Scott Quigg anyone ?! :box:
Macgregor would masticate Katie Taylor even if she outskilled him.

Science bit.
Aggregated data of absolute strength indicates that females have, on average, 40-60% the upper body strength of males, and 70-75% the lower body strength.[79] The difference in strength relative to body mass is less pronounced in trained individuals. In Olympic weightlifting, male records vary from 5.5× body mass in the lowest weight category to 4.2× in the highest weight category, while female records vary from 4.4× to 3.8×, a weight adjusted difference of only 10-20%, and an absolute difference of about 30% (i.e. 472 kg vs 333 kg for unlimited weight classes)(see Olympic weightlifting records). A study, carried about by analyzing annual world rankings from 1980–1996, found that males' running times were, on average, 11% faster than females'.[80]

Males typically have larger tracheae and branching bronchi, with about 30 percent greater lung volume per body mass. On average, males have larger hearts, 10 percent higher red blood cell count, higher hemoglobin, hence greater oxygen-carrying capacity. They also have higher circulating clotting factors (vitamin K, prothrombin and platelets). These differences lead to faster healing of wounds and higher peripheral pain tolerance.[83]
I'm not convinced on the 40% bit. First it says it is less pronounced, you'd need to check by how much that actually means, not just assume it's 40%. BUt you're also assuming a linear relationship between strength and weight

I am not "assuming a linear relationship between strength and weight." :shame:

First I'm considering the weight to strength maximum absolute difference of 30% as well as the weight-adjusted difference of 10-20%.
Then I'm adding in the higher/lower pain threshold and considering both the larger lung capacity and 10% increase in red blood cells. Finally - there's a bit about higher bone density that I didn't cut and paste.

I'm taking all these factors together - and then - pulling a guess out of my arse.


I reckon 40% is a fair handicap - that would see 6'2" Lindsay Davenport @ just below 80kg in her pomp fighting Stuey Hall.
Serena Williams vs Andrew Selby ?!

I'm starting to really want to see some of these fights ! :box:
What handicap do you suggest ?
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by skanksta »

came across this...

"Lucia Ryker vs man" - worth a watch :box:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2QgDWSfQik
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by SAPFO »

skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by skanksta »

That was a good watch !

On that evidence women would only need about 20% weight advantage, but being Thailand there must be a suspicion of LadyBoy ?
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by SAPFO »

She got her own back by dropping her towel in the showers.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28518
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by Coco »

Didn't Michael Gomez fight a transsexual in an unlicensed fight?
Taylor stands a far better chance v McGregor than he does against Mayweather.
And McGregor would completely have his head boxed off against Skeete, it would be an absolute mismatch.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by Stuarty »

Coco wrote:Didn't Michael Gomez fight a transsexual in an unlicensed fight?
Taylor stands a far better chance v McGregor than he does against Mayweather.
And McGregor would completely have his head boxed off against Skeete, it would be an absolute mismatch.
He fought a tranny :lol: I'd never heard that one.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by Tarkus »

Taylor is too small but I would say Cecilia Braekhus vs Conor McGregor is far more intriguing contest then Conor vs Floyd, which is a forgone conclusion. Even as mentioned someone like Eggington would very likely ice McGregor in few rounds.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Katie Taylor v Conor McGregor

Post by Oiky »

McGregor is a fantastic MMA fighter but has a lot to learn when it comes to straight boxing
Post Reply