Page 2 of 2
Re: PARKER VS FURY NON TITLE BOUT.
Posted: 15 Sep 2017, 03:30
by chinarich
Leaving aside the merits of Fury as a challenger (he is the mandatory) the WBO only state that officials have to be appointed from an approved list. If the two parties have agreed to neutral officials in their contract then that is nothing to do with either the Board or the WBO...
Re: PARKER VS FURY NON TITLE BOUT.
Posted: 15 Sep 2017, 04:52
by Ossyrules
Badhusker wrote:Ossyrules wrote:Covfefe wrote:
I'm not really sure what point you think you're making?
If their guidelines call for neutral country judges/officials (which I doubt they do) then having all Americans for WBO title fights in the states is nonsense.
There is no real argument vs neutral judges. Badhusker is just a massive homer
No, just a realist that doesn't rely on pissing and moaning before a fight of a robbery. This is a mismatch that shouldn't matter. Parker is B level and Fury is C at best.
I'm actually with you on that post. However boxing history is littered with guys fighting another guy who is the level below...
Ward vs paul smith
Joshua vs molina
Mayweather vs Mcgregor
We could go on