Re: Mick Hennessy update?
Posted: 07 Oct 2017, 07:27
It must be hard work consuming all those calories.Jon Saxon wrote:Nice to see people gloating over the failings of a hard working man.
It must be hard work consuming all those calories.Jon Saxon wrote:Nice to see people gloating over the failings of a hard working man.
Spud wrote:Exactly ... leave the bloke aloneJon Saxon wrote:Nice to see people gloating over the failings of a hard working man.
Real classy.
He's a promoter. Froch had become a name - he's fighting Taylor - get it on TV, not some bullshit stream.mickey1975 wrote:Mick was very unlucky losing ITV after Froch-Pascal. Fury's debut as well. I think the decision had already been made before the show, though.
The response people give to this is 'Hearn is on Sky.' Fair enough, but it ignores so much more that those saying it seem totally myopic.Glass Joe wrote:Hennessey might be a nice guy, but people mocking him is all of this is his own doing, ask yourself why the likes of Froch, Barker, Eubank, DeGale to name a few had left him, it’s because he is such a crap promoter, thats why people are against him! Those names are massive in British and World boxing and what has he got left, nothing.
He has just blown his load on an event that he done virtually nothing to sell, as a massive fan of the sport I believe he should of done his job and promoted the event and his fighter, as he didn’t why should he be exempt from the backlash? If he had done his job then no one could question it, but again he didn’t.
You wouldn’t see hearn spend that amount of cash on a event without actually trying to sell it out, even if his fighter wasn’t guaranteed to walk away with the title.
leejonesjnr wrote:Well....
This is not about Mick Hennessy in particular but it does apply, once a boxer is a 'name' they don't really need a promoter, just an event planner.
The real skill in promotion is creating that name to begin with.
When a boxer leaves a promoter because he has 'outgrown' them, or resents the money the promoter makes and wants some of that for themselves, well, surely that promoter has done a great job?
Great pointleejonesjnr wrote:Well....
This is not about Mick Hennessy in particular but it does apply, once a boxer is a 'name' they don't really need a promoter, just an event planner.
The real skill in promotion is creating that name to begin with.
When a boxer leaves a promoter because he has 'outgrown' them, or resents the money the promoter makes and wants some of that for themselves, well, surely that promoter has done a great job?
Yes agree Leejonesjnr but when Froch left hennessey he wasn’t that rich, he was fighting at the nottingham arena in front of 10k people, he left and joined hearn and look at him now set u for life, he fought in front of 80k at wembley earning millions. Froch’s fan based when he was with hennessey was zero, hearn somehow got people to like him.leejonesjnr wrote:Well....
This is not about Mick Hennessy in particular but it does apply, once a boxer is a 'name' they don't really need a promoter, just an event planner.
The real skill in promotion is creating that name to begin with.
When a boxer leaves a promoter because he has 'outgrown' them, or resents the money the promoter makes and wants some of that for themselves, well, surely that promoter has done a great job?
That's just not true, I was there the night he was supposed to fight Denis Inkin and loads had turned up, he was quite popular in Nottingham thenGlass Joe wrote:Yes agree Leejonesjnr but when Froch left hennessey he wasn’t that rich, he was fighting at the nottingham arena in front of 10k people, he left and joined hearn and look at him now set u for life, he fought in front of 80k at wembley earning millions. Froch’s fan based when he was with hennessey was zeroleejonesjnr wrote:Well....
This is not about Mick Hennessy in particular but it does apply, once a boxer is a 'name' they don't really need a promoter, just an event planner.
The real skill in promotion is creating that name to begin with.
When a boxer leaves a promoter because he has 'outgrown' them, or resents the money the promoter makes and wants some of that for themselves, well, surely that promoter has done a great job?
Fury has never been a big ticket seller. Sure some will point to the Wlad rematch tanking at the box office, which at least had an excuse of absolutely mental prices.Glass Joe wrote:Yes agree Leejonesjnr but when Froch left hennessey he wasn’t that rich, he was fighting at the nottingham arena in front of 10k people, he left and joined hearn and look at him now set u for life, he fought in front of 80k at wembley earning millions. Froch’s fan based when he was with hennessey was zero, hearn somehow got people to like him.leejonesjnr wrote:Well....
This is not about Mick Hennessy in particular but it does apply, once a boxer is a 'name' they don't really need a promoter, just an event planner.
The real skill in promotion is creating that name to begin with.
When a boxer leaves a promoter because he has 'outgrown' them, or resents the money the promoter makes and wants some of that for themselves, well, surely that promoter has done a great job?
People can think whatever they like about hennessey, nice guy or waste of space it’s our own opinion but at the end of the day he is a crap promoter who hasn’t made a lot of money for his boxers, he never really made any of his fighters in to house hold names has he? you can argue what you like about Fury but Tyson has done it all himself, not hennessey! hennessey cant even promote himself, have we heard from him since the parker fight, no! anything on his website or social media pages, no! thats what you call great promoting.
Yes hearn has the backing of sky, but give hearn the credit he actually works hard, hennessey had ITV and Channel 5, both with far more potential then sky, the ability to hit millions of viewers and what did he do, f**k it up….and we can’t blame the tv companies for all of it.
Inkin fight too, although there was a pretty good undercard for that onemickey1975 wrote:Froch-Pascal, Dirrel, Reid, that bloke from Derby were all near sell outs under Meaty Mick.
Yeah I was at all them shows the bloke from derby you mentioned was Damon HagueCounter-puncher wrote:Inkin fight too, although there was a pretty good undercard for that onemickey1975 wrote:Froch-Pascal, Dirrel, Reid, that bloke from Derby were all near sell outs under Meaty Mick.
Didn't know he fought Arthur Lowemickey1975 wrote:Froch-Pascal, Dirrel, Reid, that bloke from Derby were all near sell outs under Meaty Mick.
Exactly the words you used Mickey1975 was NEAR SELL OUT, the arena only holds 10k, so what did he sell 8k, 9k ??? still no where near the 20k Froch done at the O2 arena or 80k at Wembley, so at the end of the day hennessey couldn’t sell out an arena when he was looking after froch, he has provide that time and time again!mickey1975 wrote:Froch-Pascal, Dirrel, Reid, that bloke from Derby were all near sell outs under Meaty Mick.
George Groves had as much to do with that as him. Bute nor Mack were sell outs and he took barely anyone to see the Ward fight. Eddie has some appalling attendances, he just lies about them!Glass Joe wrote:Exactly the words you used Mickey1975 was NEAR SELL OUT, the arena only holds 10k, so what did he sell 8k, 9k ??? still no where near the 20k Froch done at the O2 arena or 80k at Wembley, so at the end of the day hennessey couldn’t sell out an arena when he was looking after froch, he has provide that time and time again!mickey1975 wrote:Froch-Pascal, Dirrel, Reid, that bloke from Derby were all near sell outs under Meaty Mick.
Hearn takes control and bam selling out arenas and 10’s of thousands at wembley. Can’t understand why people are sticking up for him, he has done nothing for the sport in recent years.