Page 2 of 2
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 23 Dec 2017, 18:40
by boxing_rocks
Ricky_ wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:23
mimmy123 wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:52
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:43
You can't accuse the moderators of behaving inappropriately if you're not in possession of any of the facts relating to Saad's ban.
It's as simple as that!
Don't act like a fûckîng twät by arguing against a stance that you clearly don't understand!
I can assure you the ban was proportionate with the events of yesterday.
I know on occasions things happen that can seem to be harsh or over zealous. I had to deal with the situation at hand along with another mod for over 4 hours until we finally concluded the whole issue.
I'm sorry if you do not agree but speculating events or happenings that did not happen is not helpful and just causes further tension.
Believe me we do not ban long term posters on a whim or anyone for that matter unless we have justifiable reasons.
I feel bad about this whole situation but enough was enough.
Merry Christmas.
Mimmy.
Why don't you ban enlightened one? His old account fergus got banned for trolling & now he's even worse.
Saad was the best boxing poster on the board. Enlightened One is the worst.
Exactly. The guy ruins threads.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 23 Dec 2017, 19:41
by Enlightened-One
You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 23 Dec 2017, 21:51
by Ricky_
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 19:41
You're confusing me with someone else. I have never received a permanent ban.
If i were you fergus i would also be too embarrassed to admit i was Fergus.
You & Brut are too stupid to realise how distinctive your trolling is.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 24 Dec 2017, 07:32
by funso banjo baby
90% of all comments should be deleted
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 24 Dec 2017, 11:40
by SenorPipino
Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
Where would Billy Joe Saunders be if he was banned for unthinking, distasteful remarks?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 24 Dec 2017, 12:40
by Ricky_
SenorPipino wrote: ↑24 Dec 2017, 11:40
Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
This. Saad got himself banned on purpose for this reason. His posts were getting deleted for no other reason some mods didn't like them. It's a shame that a quality poster is gone because of it - i liked reading Saad's opinion on the fight game, he knows the sport better than most.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 24 Dec 2017, 12:40
by boxing_rocks
Can anybody say what exactly a cause of Saad's ban was?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 08:24
by RScarf1
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑24 Dec 2017, 12:40
Can anybody say what exactly a cause of Saad's ban was?
He was a deck. Just kidding. Maybe because he repeatedly used this emoticon

Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 09:12
by Jip
Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 10:01
by Tanzio
Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12
Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?

What was the name of that masterpiece again?
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 10:07
by Jip
Tanzio wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:01
Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12
Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?

What was the name of that masterpiece again?
Mimmy/byrd was the name of the thread.
A guy called jaudg or something similar posted on my thread. He is a mod or editor, one of the bosses of boxrec. He wrote to mimmy asking mimmy to put the thread in the off topic, out of current sceane since the my thread had nothing to do with Boxing.
He went on to complain that the thread started with saad and ended with members wanting foot pics of mimmy, cause mimmy posted a foto of herself and some found her attractive and wanted more.
![[icon_neutral.gif] :neutral:](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 10:13
by Tanzio
Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:07
Tanzio wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 10:01
Jip wrote: ↑25 Dec 2017, 09:12
Mimmy is artogant. Said 0 about the reasons why she deleted saad. Because a there is no valid reason and b she doesnt care.
But i care. This boxrec community is important to me. Although most know sh:&;#t about boxing. But there are things far worse than having lopsided knowledge about boxing.
What happened to your Thread Of The Year, Jip?

What was the name of that masterpiece again?
Mimmy/byrd was the name of the thread.
A guy called jaudg or something similar posted on my thread. He is a mod or editor, one of the bosses of boxrec. He wrote to mimmy asking mimmy to put the thread in the off topic, out of current sceane since the my thread had nothing to do with Boxing.
He went on to complain that the thread started with saad and ended with members wanting foot pics of mimmy, cause mimmy posted a foto of herself and some found her attractive and wanted more.
Absolutely disgraceful that a work of art like that has been obliterated

What the fvck is going on around here? It is beginning to smell a lot like The Great FloydHype Revolt & Purge up in here.

Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 10:16
by Tony1244
SenorPipino wrote: ↑24 Dec 2017, 11:40
Comments, asinine or not, should never be stifled, unless they're mind-bogglingly offensive.
The concept of free speech must be adhered.
Where would Billy Joe Saunders be if he was banned for unthinking, distasteful remarks?

Re: Victimization on BoxRec
Posted: 25 Dec 2017, 14:00
by KiwiRider
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:40
Ricky_ wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 18:23
mimmy123 wrote: ↑23 Dec 2017, 17:52
I can assure you the ban was proportionate with the events of yesterday.
I know on occasions things happen that can seem to be harsh or over zealous. I had to deal with the situation at hand along with another mod for over 4 hours until we finally concluded the whole issue.
I'm sorry if you do not agree but speculating events or happenings that did not happen is not helpful and just causes further tension.
Believe me we do not ban long term posters on a whim or anyone for that matter unless we have justifiable reasons.
I feel bad about this whole situation but enough was enough.
Merry Christmas.
Mimmy.
Why don't you ban enlightened one? His old account fergus got banned for trolling & now he's even worse.
Saad was the best boxing poster on the board. Enlightened One is the worst.
Exactly. The guy ruins threads.
Weird. Your entitled to your opinions of course.