BoxRec

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 09:12

Luis Fernando12 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 05:10 Pulev out boxes and out jabs every one in the heavyweight division. Including Anthony Joshua and Deontay Wilder.

Another delusional post from Fernando!

Right! So we're going to ignore the fact that Johan Duhaupas ( a significantly inferior version of Kubrat Pulev) didn't totally out jab, outclass, and visibly damage Deontay Wilder's face with a very basic and a rudimentary jab / jabbing game? Kubrat Pulev would do far worse mind you!

Deontay Wilder practically made Duhaupas look like a prime Gennady Golovkin!

Pulev is better than Duhaupas in pretty much every department!

As for Anthony Joshua, he has a relatively weak jab for a SUPER HEAVYWEIGHT. And a washed up, 41 year old Wladimir Klitschko coming from a 2 year lay off managed to out-jab Anthony Joshua in a jabbing contest. Kubrat Pulev would finish off where Wlad left off and actually last 12 rounds whilst giving Joshua a jabbing lesson.

Luis Fernando12 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 12:05

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 09:12

Luis Fernando12 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 05:10 Pulev out boxes and out jabs every one in the heavyweight division. Including Anthony Joshua and Deontay Wilder.

Another delusional post from Fernando!

Right! So we're going to ignore the fact that Johan Duhaupas ( a significantly inferior version of Kubrat Pulev) didn't totally out jab, outclass, and visibly damage Deontay Wilder's face with a very basic and a rudimentary jab / jabbing game? Kubrat Pulev would do far worse mind you!

Deontay Wilder practically made Duhaupas look like a prime Gennady Golovkin!

Pulev is better than Duhaupas in pretty much every department!

As for Anthony Joshua, he has a relatively weak jab for a SUPER HEAVYWEIGHT. And a washed up, 41 year old Wladimir Klitschko coming from a 2 year lay off managed to out-jab Anthony Joshua in a jabbing contest. Kubrat Pulev would finish off where Wlad left off and actually last 12 rounds whilst giving Joshua a jabbing lesson.

Well for a start, Klitschko has always been a much more accomplished jabber than Pulev, so it's not at all surprising that Joshua lost the jab contest against such a seasoned champion.

Both Wilder and Joshua have a significantly longer reach than Pulev, so unless he has established amazing feet in the near two years of inactivity, he will be dealt the same fate as Parker (who does have good movement) and miss the majority of his jabs.

Aside from that, if Pulev is relying on the jab to beat either, he will be grossly out of his depth.

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2018, 11:44

Luis Fernando12 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 12:05

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑13 Apr 2018, 09:12

Another delusional post from Fernando!

Right! So we're going to ignore the fact that Johan Duhaupas ( a significantly inferior version of Kubrat Pulev) didn't totally out jab, outclass, and visibly damage Deontay Wilder's face with a very basic and a rudimentary jab / jabbing game? Kubrat Pulev would do far worse mind you!

Deontay Wilder practically made Duhaupas look like a prime Gennady Golovkin!

Pulev is better than Duhaupas in pretty much every department!

As for Anthony Joshua, he has a relatively weak jab for a SUPER HEAVYWEIGHT. And a washed up, 41 year old Wladimir Klitschko coming from a 2 year lay off managed to out-jab Anthony Joshua in a jabbing contest. Kubrat Pulev would finish off where Wlad left off and actually last 12 rounds whilst giving Joshua a jabbing lesson.

Well for a start, Klitschko has always been a much more accomplished jabber than Pulev, so it's not at all surprising that Joshua lost the jab contest against such a seasoned champion.

Both Wilder and Joshua have a significantly longer reach than Pulev, so unless he has established amazing feet in the near two years of inactivity, he will be dealt the same fate as Parker (who does have good movement) and miss the majority of his jabs.

Aside from that, if Pulev is relying on the jab to beat either, he will be grossly out of his depth.

Actually, Wladimir Klitschko couldn't out jab Kubrat Pulev like he managed to against Anthony Joshua. It was Wlad's left hook that got him the win against Pulev. And Pulev was the first boxer ever to have stunned Wladimir Klitschko with just a jab. So Pulev's jab is arguably just as good as Wlad's, if not even better. His power jab may even be better. And overall, Pulev's jab is currently the best in the heavyweight division today.

Johan Duhaupas is inferior to Pulev in most departments, especially when it comes to the jab. And Duhaupas also had a shorter reach than Wilder. Yet, Duhaupas managed to out-jab Wilder on multiple instances and with mostly the jab alone, managed to make it a 50/50 fight where he won pretty much as many rounds as Wilder did before the premature, questionable stoppage. So I expect Pulev to do even better and get the victory against Wilder.

Anthony Joshua will be out-jabbed like he was against Wladimir Klitschko. Except, unlike Wladimir Klitschko, Anthony Joshua's left hook is nowhere near as powerful or as good as Wlad's. So Joshua doesn't have the same option that Wlad did at using the left hook to bail him out of trouble against Pulev. Pulev is a horrible match up for Joshua or Wilder. Joshua's jab is extremely weak and poor for a super heavyweight.

And by the way, Joshua barely beat Parker. It was a 7-5 type of fight either way. A draw is a reasonable result. Neither DEFINITELY won.