Re: Fury vs. Seferi proves one thing...
Posted: 10 Jun 2018, 06:26
I’ve said for years that boxing needs another division between Cruiser and Heavy - the discrepancy in size can be totally absurd at HW.
Does anybody know what he did get paid just out of interest?littlepug wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 06:10With dicilpline and a bit of work ethic Seferi could easily stay at cruiser rather than chance it in a division he doesnt belong in, all it does is give proper heavyweights like Fury an easy nights work, fair enough if you want to try and create a bit of history by moving up and trying to pull off what can seem like an impossible task ala Haye/Valuev but its still a bit gimmicky and when Haye went up against a real world class heavy in Klit it was plain to see he didnt belong, want the glamour and big buck of a heavyweight but not born as one ? well tough luck son because theres another 15 divisions below you with boxers wanting the exact same thing, Seferi didnt get thrown in with anyone, it was of his own choosing for the payday he wasnt gonna get at cruiser.x2x wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 05:36littlepug wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 04:28
I feel they are necessary but thats just me as for the small Heavies they should be cruisers but the fact they cant be arsed to make the weight and want the bigger bucks is their problem, they moan they cant make it, they should try being bone dry and stuck between divisions down at the little weights.
How discriminatory and unfair to demand that only men whose natural weight happens to be in the low 200's somehow alter their bodies to fit into a lower weight class, while everybody else is meticulously accomodated! For instance, a 168 pound super middleweight won't ever have to fight anyone weighing even six pounds more than him; or a 115 pound super flyweight won't have to fight anyone more than two pounds heavier! But a 210 pound fighter like Seferi gets thrown in with someone weighing almost one third his bodyweight - 66 pounds - heavier. That would be equivalent your super middleweight fighting a 223 pound man!
Agree, I want to see Usyk stick around at CW, at least until he's cleaned out the division. I hate that CWs face pressure to move up when they're vastly undersized for HW.squiggy wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 00:37I don't know, but for my money, current champion Usyk is the greatest cruiserweight who hasn't moved up. Which is why I wish he'd stick around and rule the division -- he could well put together a better career at the weight than Holyfield did.jujigatame wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 22:26 It's true, cruiserweight gets unfairly treated as a 2nd class division. In the UFC, guys like Jon Jones and Chuck Liddell who fought their entire career at LHW (the UFC equivalent to CW) are considered all-time greats. In boxing whenever there's an elite CW talent people just talk about them like their career hasn't truly begun until they move up to HW.
Is there a single boxing HOFer who fought predominantly at CW and never moved up?
Course, Holyfield could've stuck around and ruled it indefinitely... and would up like five percent as rich and famous as he did.
Dont know mate, mustve been half decent plus more exsposure than he has ever had before.clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 09:25Does anybody know what he did get paid just out of interest?littlepug wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 06:10With dicilpline and a bit of work ethic Seferi could easily stay at cruiser rather than chance it in a division he doesnt belong in, all it does is give proper heavyweights like Fury an easy nights work, fair enough if you want to try and create a bit of history by moving up and trying to pull off what can seem like an impossible task ala Haye/Valuev but its still a bit gimmicky and when Haye went up against a real world class heavy in Klit it was plain to see he didnt belong, want the glamour and big buck of a heavyweight but not born as one ? well tough luck son because theres another 15 divisions below you with boxers wanting the exact same thing, Seferi didnt get thrown in with anyone, it was of his own choosing for the payday he wasnt gonna get at cruiser.x2x wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 05:36
How discriminatory and unfair to demand that only men whose natural weight happens to be in the low 200's somehow alter their bodies to fit into a lower weight class, while everybody else is meticulously accomodated! For instance, a 168 pound super middleweight won't ever have to fight anyone weighing even six pounds more than him; or a 115 pound super flyweight won't have to fight anyone more than two pounds heavier! But a 210 pound fighter like Seferi gets thrown in with someone weighing almost one third his bodyweight - 66 pounds - heavier. That would be equivalent your super middleweight fighting a 223 pound man!
I've heard a great many worse ideas.x2x wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 19:15littlepug wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 19:05You dont understand the importance those small differences make in the lower divisions, it can literally be the difference between life and death in some cases and all for sod all money.x2x wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:09 ...and that is that we need *at least* one more heavyweight division! As it is they were both in the same weight division, and what a huge handicap that is for the smaller man! Meanwhile the ridiculous light weight divisions are separated by a mere two or three pounds.
All those absurd lower weight divisions are just so they can bill more fights as championship fights and put more asses in the seats. The whole antiquated and nonsensical weight division system should revised and redone by percentage increments.
The upper weight limit is stupid. There isn't a single decent HW in history who couldn't make that weight. All the top MMA HWs of all time (Fedor, Nogueria, Werdum, Miocic, Velasquez) are in the 230-250 range.
This, although Brock would qualify as better than decent and he cut to make 265.jujigatame wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 18:38The upper weight limit is stupid. There isn't a single decent HW in history who couldn't make that weight. All the top MMA HWs of all time (Fedor, Nogueria, Werdum, Miocic, Velasquez) are in the 230-250 range.
OK call it what you want, but the way it's set up now makes no sense.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 09:45I've heard a great many worse ideas.
As much as it pains me to advocate adding to the proliferation, we do need another division. This should be Super-Cruiserweight. On no account should we devalue 100+ years of Heavyweight history/ achievement by creating a Super-Heavyweight division.
It didn't prove any such thing.x2x wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:09 ...and that is that we need *at least* one more heavyweight division! As it is they were both in the same weight division, and what a huge handicap that is for the smaller man! Meanwhile the ridiculous light weight divisions are separated by a mere two or three pounds.
He would've beaten the piss out of him because he's a fighter not a coward.Syntax Error wrote: ↑11 Jun 2018, 08:03It didn't prove any such thing.x2x wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:09 ...and that is that we need *at least* one more heavyweight division! As it is they were both in the same weight division, and what a huge handicap that is for the smaller man! Meanwhile the ridiculous light weight divisions are separated by a mere two or three pounds.
Fury is a fat bar steward who should be weighing about 25lbs less than he does & Seferi is a crap cruiserweight.
The night Evander Holyfield became HW champion, he weighed less than Seferi & he marmalised the fat Buster Douglas.
What do you think that 208 lb Holyfield would have done to the 276 lb Fury of Saturday night?
Ability is far more important than unncessary girth.
Heavyweight Champions of the past weighed under 200 pounds and beat men that weighed in excess of 240 or 250 pounds sometimes.x2x wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 23:02OK call it what you want, but the way it's set up now makes no sense.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 09:45I've heard a great many worse ideas.
As much as it pains me to advocate adding to the proliferation, we do need another division. This should be Super-Cruiserweight. On no account should we devalue 100+ years of Heavyweight history/ achievement by creating a Super-Heavyweight division.
This suggestion can go straight to hell. Boxing needs 7 less weight classes. Not 1 more.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 06:26 I’ve said for years that boxing needs another division between Cruiser and Heavy - the discrepancy in size can be totally absurd at HW.
Yes Dempsey beat Willard but Willard and Carnera were champions because they were huge for those days not because they were good. There's a world of difference between pounding on some great uncoordinated lummox and trying to tackle a 6' 6" fighting machine like Joshua.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jun 2018, 16:59Heavyweight Champions of the past weighed under 200 pounds and beat men that weighed in excess of 240 or 250 pounds sometimes.x2x wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 23:02OK call it what you want, but the way it's set up now makes no sense.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Jun 2018, 09:45
I've heard a great many worse ideas.
As much as it pains me to advocate adding to the proliferation, we do need another division. This should be Super-Cruiserweight. On no account should we devalue 100+ years of Heavyweight history/ achievement by creating a Super-Heavyweight division.
Calling for another weight class is calling for the ruination of the sport.
Syntax Error wrote: ↑11 Jun 2018, 08:03It didn't prove any such thing.x2x wrote: ↑09 Jun 2018, 18:09 ...and that is that we need *at least* one more heavyweight division! As it is they were both in the same weight division, and what a huge handicap that is for the smaller man! Meanwhile the ridiculous light weight divisions are separated by a mere two or three pounds.
Fury is a fat bar steward who should be weighing about 25lbs less than he does & Seferi is a crap cruiserweight.
The night Evander Holyfield became HW champion, he weighed less than Seferi & he marmalised the fat Buster Douglas.
What do you think that 208 lb Holyfield would have done to the 276 lb Fury of Saturday night?
Ability is far more important than unncessary girth.