Page 2 of 2
Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?
Posted: 05 Mar 2019, 15:06
by jamamb
there were some real good fights for usa regional bouts even just back in the early 2000s. back then these types of guys would fight there hearts out on friday night fights or something. winners would often get a shot to fight on hbo, though usually as the opponent to be beaten
Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?
Posted: 05 Mar 2019, 15:10
by ewenhay
gilgamesh wrote: ↑05 Mar 2019, 14:42
ewenhay wrote: ↑04 Mar 2019, 17:57
Yeah the match ups are the problem.
In days gone by the likes of Whyte v Parker would have been for the Commonwealth
That was the way it was with say a title like the NABF title in America too. By the 90's or 2000's it was being competed for by mediocre third raters, but in the 1970's it was contested in Ken Norton vs Muhammad Ali 1.
Now you'll actually have so called Major World Title fights that are contested with much lesser fighters involved than that.
Just way too many belts.
I'd like to be able to just snap my fingers, and make at least 80 of 'em disappear, but eh what can you do? Basically it's just up to the fans to look at the talent, and decipher who really is the Champ.
Another thing we can blame the alphabet sanctioning bodies for.
Creating extra belts to dilute regional titles by takeover.