Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

I was just thinking after Leigh Wood’s emphatic victory last night to win the commonwealth title whether the title has lost value. I was very disappointed with Abraham Bono, as I was with Felix Cash’s opponent a few weeks back. These title fights should be a great scrap, not a blowout. The last two on sky sports have been mismatches
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by candyslim »

It certainly has over my lifetime but you can probably say that about almost any titles (cruiser and Super-middleweight ones excepted) as the number of titles has proliferated. If you meant over the last few years I couldn't honestly say.
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

I just feel that these Africans coming in must be cheap and coming for a payday- bono last night just gave up. The British standard is now way way ahead as we will see when okolie fights Camacho. Opponents for international titles are better
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by candyslim »

There can't be any doubt that there are quality fighters from Commonwealth countries eligible to fight for the title, but because they can, it doesn't mean they are going to get the nomination, or whether they'd even be interested.

It's the same with the European: What do these Heavyweights have in common? (A) Tyson Fury, Dillian Whyte, Alexandr Povetkin, Kubrat Pulev, Filip Hrgovic, Sergey Kuzmin, (B) Johann Duhaupas, Carlos Takam, Hughie Fury, Christian Hammer, Manuel Charr, Robert Helenius ?

Answer : They are (A) probably (B) arguably - better than the current EBU Heavyweight Champion Agit Kabayel . In theory the only European who's better than the EBU Champion is the holder of a World Championship belt such as Anthony Joshua but this isn't the case in reality.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by leejonesjnr »

The Commonwealth is, in theory, the next step up from British but in reality the British title is now held in higher regard.
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

I don’t think that the European title has reduced in credibility recently though - if you win one you can move onto fringe world level. If you win the commonwealth you have little knowledge on whether you should challenge for a British title because it’s a 1-2 round blowout
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

leejonesjnr wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 13:17 The Commonwealth is, in theory, the next step up from British but in reality the British title is now held in higher regard.
I can’t remember the commonwealth being more credible than British but it’s nowhere near the same level. British title fights are almost always competitive fights.
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

candyslim wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 12:55 There can't be any doubt that there are quality fighters from Commonwealth countries eligible to fight for the title, but because they can, it doesn't mean they are going to get the nomination, or whether they'd even be interested.

It's the same with the European: What do these Heavyweights have in common? (A) Tyson Fury, Dillian Whyte, Alexandr Povetkin, Kubrat Pulev, Filip Hrgovic, Sergey Kuzmin, (B) Johann Duhaupas, Carlos Takam, Hughie Fury, Christian Hammer, Manuel Charr, Robert Helenius ?

Answer : They are (A) probably (B) arguably - better than the current EBU Heavyweight Champion Agit Kabayel . In theory the only European who's better than the EBU Champion is the holder of a World Championship belt such as Anthony Joshua but this isn't the case in reality.
^^
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26501
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by KiwiRider »

I think we should vote England out of the commonwealth.
And change the commonwealth belt, it's a bit gay. Anything with a rainbow on it suggests your going to get bummed in the changing room if you wear it.
Image
Or perhaps they should make it a gay only belt, hollow out the middle and it can be a personal portable gloy hole :maybe:
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by jamamb »

leejonesjnr wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 13:17 The Commonwealth is, in theory, the next step up from British but in reality the British title is now held in higher regard.
yep, british is far higher today, usually a good standard for that but with the commonwealth you get a lot of total patsys brought over
ERIC GUY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 21:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by ERIC GUY »

Joel2 wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 10:50 I was just thinking after Leigh Wood’s emphatic victory last night to win the commonwealth title whether the title has lost value. I was very disappointed with Abraham Bono, as I was with Felix Cash’s opponent a few weeks back. These title fights should be a great scrap, not a blowout. The last two on sky sports have been mismatches
Wen you say lost value, what exactly? money?, fan base?, fans knowledge? reputation?
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by leejonesjnr »

KiwiRider wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 14:20 I think we should vote England out of the commonwealth.
And change the commonwealth belt, it's a bit gay. Anything with a rainbow on it suggests your going to get bummed in the changing room if you wear it.
Image
Or perhaps they should make it a gay only belt, hollow out the middle and it can be a personal portable gloy hole :maybe:
Yes the belt doesn't look very good.
To everything else - don't be such a prick.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by gilgamesh »

I wasn't even aware of it's existence until a few years ago so it's gained value in my eyes from "Commonwealth title? What the hell are you talking about?" to "Oh yeah one of those British titles right?" :lol:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Enlightened-One »

A lot of excellent fighters captured the commonwealth title before moving onto achieving world honours. It’s never been the sort of championship held by top-ten world-rated contenders.

Look at the careers of Billy Joe Saunders, Anthony Joshua, Tyson Fury, George Groves etc., they all competed for the Commonwealth and British titles around the same time, shortly before they progressed onto European and then world-level.

So there’s no real reason to expect any big names to hold a commonwealth title, since it’s a belt for prospects that are in the midst of learning their trade, rather than experienced world-rated talent.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by SenorPipino »

It's loss of prestige probably goes hand and hand with the proliferation of belts in modern boxing.

There's just too many belts so they've lost all significance. Belts these days are even invented for particular fights.

No one cares about belts any longer or attach must value. There's no excuse for not having some belt.

I can recall when being the NABF or USBA champion meant something. It was usually reserved for the best American fighter who wasn't a world champion.

But nowadays, it means nada. Just one more belt out of seemingly hundreds

I've said it before: belts no longer make the fighter. It's the fighter who makes the belt.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by ElJefe »

Leigh Wood KO2 Abraham Osei Bonsu - Bonsu had lost 3 of his last 6.

Felix Cash KO1 Rasheed Abolaji - Abolaji was coming off a stoppage loss and hadn't fought for over a year.

Phillip Bowes KO2 Benson Nyilawila - Nyilawila was coming off a loss just over 2 months prior.

Lee McGregor KO12 Thomas Essomba - Essomba had been the distance with a couple of good Brits and had stopped Louis Norman but had still lost 3 of his last 4, 1 of them 2 weights below Bantam.

Liam Cameron KO2 Nicky Jenman - Jenman was 20-10-1 and coming off a loss 4 weeks earlier.

Those 5 are all since last April. Been plenty of decent fights for the Commonwealth in that time of course. Davies Jr/Foot, Cordina/Dodd/Coyle, Gill/Doyle/Bellotti. But also far too many mismatches. Shouldn't be happening for a title.
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Duran1970 »

SenorPipino wrote: 04 Mar 2019, 12:29 It's loss of prestige probably goes hand and hand with the proliferation of belts in modern boxing.

There's just too many belts so they've lost all significance. Belts these days are even invented for particular fights.

No one cares about belts any longer or attach must value. There's no excuse for not having some belt.

I can recall when being the NABF or USBA champion meant something. It was usually reserved for the best American fighter who wasn't a world champion.

But nowadays, it means nada. Just one more belt out of seemingly hundreds

I've said it before: belts no longer make the fighter. It's the fighter who makes the belt.
X2
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

ERIC GUY wrote: 04 Mar 2019, 10:48
Joel2 wrote: 03 Mar 2019, 10:50 I was just thinking after Leigh Wood’s emphatic victory last night to win the commonwealth title whether the title has lost value. I was very disappointed with Abraham Bono, as I was with Felix Cash’s opponent a few weeks back. These title fights should be a great scrap, not a blowout. The last two on sky sports have been mismatches
Wen you say lost value, what exactly? money?, fan base?, fans knowledge? reputation?
In terms of how boxers at a higher level ( British champ) view if they are a good test or not and in terms of how they are considered with fans. I don’t think that fans regard it as highly as a few years back. British level boxers won’t know or promoters whether they are ready
Joel2
Lightweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 25 Nov 2017, 17:19

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by Joel2 »

ElJefe wrote: 04 Mar 2019, 15:41 Leigh Wood KO2 Abraham Osei Bonsu - Bonsu had lost 3 of his last 6.

Felix Cash KO1 Rasheed Abolaji - Abolaji was coming off a stoppage loss and hadn't fought for over a year.

Phillip Bowes KO2 Benson Nyilawila - Nyilawila was coming off a loss just over 2 months prior.

Lee McGregor KO12 Thomas Essomba - Essomba had been the distance with a couple of good Brits and had stopped Louis Norman but had still lost 3 of his last 4, 1 of them 2 weights below Bantam.

Liam Cameron KO2 Nicky Jenman - Jenman was 20-10-1 and coming off a loss 4 weeks earlier.

Those 5 are all since last April. Been plenty of decent fights for the Commonwealth in that time of course. Davies Jr/Foot, Cordina/Dodd/Coyle, Gill/Doyle/Bellotti. But also far too many mismatches. Shouldn't be happening for a title.
Exactly my point mate people are winning it by blowouts against nobodies
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by caldo2025 »

What’s the the commonwealth title. Lol
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by littlepug »

It’s been a while since we’ve had Lewis v Ruddock or Benn v Watson type matches for the commonwealth, I’m pretty sure Azumah Nelson also won it
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by ewenhay »

Yeah the match ups are the problem.

In days gone by the likes of Whyte v Parker would have been for the Commonwealth
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by candyslim »

Good point.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by gilgamesh »

ewenhay wrote: 04 Mar 2019, 17:57 Yeah the match ups are the problem.

In days gone by the likes of Whyte v Parker would have been for the Commonwealth
That was the way it was with say a title like the NABF title in America too. By the 90's or 2000's it was being competed for by mediocre third raters, but in the 1970's it was contested in Ken Norton vs Muhammad Ali 1.

Now you'll actually have so called Major World Title fights that are contested with much lesser fighters involved than that.

Just way too many belts.

I'd like to be able to just snap my fingers, and make at least 80 of 'em disappear, but eh what can you do? Basically it's just up to the fans to look at the talent, and decipher who really is the Champ.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Has the Commonwealth title lost value?

Post by candyslim »

Exactly. I still keep a logbook of heavyweights adding newbies as they show they have something about them (latest entry Peter Kadiru at number 304 if anyone gives a sh1t) and I record their results but I never bother to mention whether any title is at stake because I consider it meaningless.

Obviously it's way less comprehensive than BoxRec but the original volume pre-dated BoxRec by many years. I started it in 72 IIRC.
Post Reply