BoxRec

Wee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 05:59

skanksta wrote: ↑16 Dec 2019, 19:18 F=ma

But if a newton studied boxing he’d probably add..

F=((ma)-d)(Ac + did you see it coming)-C

Force = (mass x acceleration) minus deceleration(the speed the struck fighter is moving away when rolling with the punch) multiplied by Accuracy(point of chin, liver etc) times “were they expecting it” - C (chin)

Chin would probably need some clever dick to calculate a new formula - it’s a much bigger mystery than power.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 13:37

Wee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 05:59

Aye smatface, thats what I'm saying.

Wee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 15:55

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 13:37
Aye smatface, thats what I'm saying.

Excuse me?

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 15:57

Wee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 15:55


Excuse me?

Not you, skanksta.

Coco wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 15:23 Speed kills
The punches you don't see hurt you

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 16:35 Shouldn't Floyd be a KTFO'er then

skanksta wrote: ↑16 Dec 2019, 19:18 F=ma

But if a newton studied boxing he’d probably add..

F=((ma)-d)(Ac + did you see it coming)-C

Force = (mass x acceleration) minus deceleration(the speed the struck fighter is moving away when rolling with the punch) multiplied by Accuracy(point of chin, liver etc) times “were they expecting it” - C (chin)

Chin would probably need some clever dick to calculate a new formula - it’s a much bigger mystery than power.

Delta Jay wrote: ↑18 Dec 2019, 07:12

skanksta wrote: ↑16 Dec 2019, 19:18 F=ma

But if a newton studied boxing he’d probably add..

F=((ma)-d)(Ac + did you see it coming)-C

Force = (mass x acceleration) minus deceleration(the speed the struck fighter is moving away when rolling with the punch) multiplied by Accuracy(point of chin, liver etc) times “were they expecting it” - C (chin)

Chin would probably need some clever dick to calculate a new formula - it’s a much bigger mystery than power.

And remember deceleration can be a negative value, or just acceleration, when a fighter moves into a punch.

I’m making a mess of GCSE Physics here but I think impact is momentum change. Momentum is mass by speed. Speed is velocity in a certain direction(?).

The speed is how fast the punch travels and if it travels directly towards the target (not a glancing blow)

Mass isn’t just the size of the fighter, good technique will allow you to put more of your total weight behind the punch.

If you see a punch you’ll move away from it, changing the momentum.

So if a heavy object moves quickly and directly towards another heavy object moving quickly and directly in the opposite direction, that’s the biggest impact. Like two big trucks in a head-on collision

Is that right?

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 16:35 Shouldn't Floyd be a KTFO'er then

skanksta wrote: ↑18 Dec 2019, 08:33

Delta Jay wrote: ↑18 Dec 2019, 07:12

And remember deceleration can be a negative value, or just acceleration, when a fighter moves into a punch.

I’m making a mess of GCSE Physics here but I think impact is momentum change. Momentum is mass by speed. Speed is velocity in a certain direction(?).

The speed is how fast the punch travels and if it travels directly towards the target (not a glancing blow)

Mass isn’t just the size of the fighter, good technique will allow you to put more of your total weight behind the punch.

If you see a punch you’ll move away from it, changing the momentum.

So if a heavy object moves quickly and directly towards another heavy object moving quickly and directly in the opposite direction, that’s the biggest impact. Like two big trucks in a head-on collision

Is that right?

Yes.
Deceleration could be added acceleration and increase the total power - and often does. The ‘glancing blow’ thing should be taken care of by the Ac = for accuracy.

polecateddy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 15:48It's something akin to throwing a javelin. It's either already in you to do it well, or just forget about it. All the training in the world is worth maybe a 10% improvement.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 13:37

Wee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Dec 2019, 05:59

Aye smatface, thats what I'm saying.