Page 2 of 2
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 13:05
by dookus
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 13:00
dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25
I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!
What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"
This confirms my suspiciouns about Ron existing in another reality to the rest of us.
I get the ironic appeal, but imagine going back on youtube to watch a classic fight and discovering big Ron's calling it. Now you're not just watching a fight. You're also listening to
Ron Oooohhhhhhhhh McIntosh proffering elucidating annotations upon the fist-laden exploits in the square ring canvassed circle of the boxing variety as these two sinewy exponents of the punches arcing explode into action............ etc etc. It's unendurable. He ruins every fight.

Oh god, the horror! They'll have to go back and overdub all his fights like the footage is from 1925 and just pretend the technology of sound recording was lost in the UK around 2010
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 13:10
by MightyWarrior
Ronald Mackintosh is only slightly bearable because he has marginally improved from the pure horror of his earlier commentary
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 13:32
by Frostieballs
dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25
Delta Jay wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 11:24
I can see how anyone would find him annoying, his tone and the dictionary vomit and all that.
He’s boxed himself a bit (apparently) and he reads fights decently enough, but his research and knowledge is A1. Even on a tricky gig like the Worlds in Russia last year he had a good bit of background info on every fighter.
I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!
What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"
Ron is really well researched and I always find he adds interesting colour, but he does perhaps pitch himself at too high a level sometimes!
Another really well educated commentator, or presenter I should say, is Ed Robinson. I was really baffled when Sky stopped giving him so much airtime. Solid bloke as well. One of the nicest in the sport.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 13:44
by Delta Jay
Frostieballs wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 13:32
dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25
I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!
What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"
Ron is really well researched and I always find he adds interesting colour, but he does perhaps pitch himself at too high a level sometimes!
Another really well educated commentator, or presenter I should say, is Ed Robinson. I was really baffled when Sky stopped giving him so much airtime. Solid bloke as well. One of the nicest in the sport.
It’s arse-backwards. Anyone who’s good and knowledgeable like Ed gets bailed off and anyone who can scream about the grit and determination or repeat a fighter’s exaggerated backstory gets the promotion. I’ve only just realised I haven’t seen him for ages, get him back as well.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 14:34
by Coco
Ed Robinson was working behind the scenes for quite a while before doing some of the presenting work.
I think he got the push around the same time as Darke and McCrory.
He occasionally posted on here too.
I dunno is he is still working for SKY or not, but he is another face who is missed.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 15:03
by Frostieballs
Coco wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 14:34
Ed Robinson was working behind the scenes for quite a while before doing some of the presenting work.
I think he got the push around the same time as Darke and McCrory.
He occasionally posted on here too.
I dunno is he is still working for SKY or not, but he is another face who is missed.
He put in the years and work required to get his break. When he got It he didn’t disappoint but for some reason wasn’t/isn’t used anywhere near as much as he should be.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 15:20
by Boxerbeetle
Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 17:19
by Onamastus
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 15:20
Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
Those old shows have such an air of sophistication now. Boxing broadcasts have been dragged into the gutter.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 22 Aug 2020, 19:04
by Frostieballs
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 17:19
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 15:20
Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
Those old shows have such an air of sophistication now. Boxing broadcasts have been dragged into the gutter.
I blame Neil Diamond.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 23 Aug 2020, 16:47
by margaret thatcher
Its the little things that can make a difference, like for Pov-Whyte, the first round was close, could feasibly gone either way as they eased into it and not much happened, but instead Adam Smith just insists that Whyte definitely won it , too much trying to force a narrative you know bruh
A good commentator is more like a guide who can educate people and help them form their own opinions instead of just slamming some fanboi nuthugger story on them
Lol Ron's brain is special for sure, it's his gift and curse

Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 23 Aug 2020, 18:19
by fizzjambo
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 10:25
Could those saying they like Ron McIntosh please explain what it is they like about his work?
He’s not Adam Smith
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 23 Aug 2020, 19:04
by Coco
fizzjambo wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020, 18:19
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 10:25
Could those saying they like Ron McIntosh please explain what it is they like about his work?
He’s not Adam Smith
That is Ron's biggest plus point
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 24 Aug 2020, 14:34
by fizzjambo
Coco wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020, 19:04
fizzjambo wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020, 18:19
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 10:25
Could those saying they like Ron McIntosh please explain what it is they like about his work?
He’s not Adam Smith
It’s a big plus as well
That is Ron's biggest plus point
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 02:33
by (craig)
Why did the 'why does Adam Smith have a camera on himself while commentating?' thread get exterminated?
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 12:01
by Frostieballs
Shhhh wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 09:12
(craig) wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 02:33
Why did the 'why does Adam Smith have a camera on himself while commentating?' thread get exterminated?
Also all the later posts Have disappeared from the Whyte Povetkin live thread? Was Adam smith mentioned on that? Is Smith the new Bunce? Trettning posters on boxrec?
I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 12:19
by dookus
Frostieballs wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:01
Shhhh wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 09:12
(craig) wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 02:33
Why did the 'why does Adam Smith have a camera on himself while commentating?' thread get exterminated?
Also all the later posts Have disappeared from the Whyte Povetkin live thread? Was Adam smith mentioned on that? Is Smith the new Bunce? Trettning posters on boxrec?
I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
I think it's been moved to the RBR forum as I was able to track one of my posts down
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 12:29
by Counter-puncher
fizzjambo wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020, 18:19
Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 10:25
Could those saying they like Ron McIntosh please explain what it is they like about his work?
He’s not Adam Smith

Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 13:59
by Boxerbeetle
dookus wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:19
Frostieballs wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:01
Shhhh wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 09:12
Also all the later posts Have disappeared from the Whyte Povetkin live thread? Was Adam smith mentioned on that? Is Smith the new Bunce? Trettning posters on boxrec?
I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
I think it's been moved to the RBR forum as I was able to track one of my posts down
One of my biggest bugbears, I’ve given up complaining about it now because it never changes. Absolutely no point in moving an active RBR thread to a different part of the forum where hardly anyone goes, it kills the conversation dead and it’s not like there’s loads of traffic on the board as it is. Mods should at least wait until it drops off the first page of B&I before moving it.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 14:00
by margaret thatcher
Agree, shouldnt be moved till hits 2nd page
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Posted: 25 Aug 2020, 15:14
by Frostieballs
I didn’t know a RBR forum even existed, but then again I am a newbie.