weight bullies

JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6560
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by JamesPhilips »

dookus wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:44
jameswilson wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 10:02 Scott Harrison.
Harrison was absolutely huge for featherweight, and this was in the early 00s before modern weight cutting techniques. Wonder what weight they could get him to now!
Whats he doing now?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13416
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: weight bullies

Post by jameswilson »

JamesPhilips wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:57
dookus wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:44
jameswilson wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 10:02 Scott Harrison.
Harrison was absolutely huge for featherweight, and this was in the early 00s before modern weight cutting techniques. Wonder what weight they could get him to now!
Whats he doing now?
Throwing crisps.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: weight bullies

Post by rob h »

Never heard this term before. You either make weight, or you don't.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by margaret thatcher »

duh :lol:

no idea why some people seem to think that 'you either make weight or dont' is incompatible with the question

has anyone suggested that there is some 3rd realm between making weight and not making weight?
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3372
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: weight bullies

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Is it something that people think should be frowned upon ? For me, regardless of what access they have to sports science and nutrition it must take a huge amount of dedication and sacrifice for fighters to boil down to way below their walk around weight so surely they’ve earned any weight bully advantage on fight night ?
emallini
Middleweight
Posts: 1676
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 12:31

Re: weight bullies

Post by emallini »

Cyclops wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:38
emallini wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:17 A weight bully does not exist. This is a made up term by Internet fans. You do not hear that in boxing gyms. It does not exist. You either make the weight or you don't. End of.
I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.

Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.

You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.

Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.

But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
I am telling you that it isn't a thing. I am not debating it. I am telling you something.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: weight bullies

Post by rob h »

No, it's isn't incompatible with the question. Weight cutting has been part of the sport for generations but is more prevalent now due to sports science. If you want to get to a decent level, you need to cut weight.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: weight bullies

Post by watsupdoc87 »

KiwiRider wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 15:13 Zurdo.
Weight bullied his way to 40-0, hung onto his belt in a death grip without facing anyone decent, moves up to LHW and faces even lesser opponents :doh:
What a c*ckgobbler :wave:
Is he still going? I ain't heard a peep from him in a couple years :bag:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28504
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: weight bullies

Post by Coco »

If you are comfortable at the weight you are fighting at the wrong weight
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: weight bullies

Post by Cyclops »

emallini wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 17:12
Cyclops wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:38
emallini wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:17 A weight bully does not exist. This is a made up term by Internet fans. You do not hear that in boxing gyms. It does not exist. You either make the weight or you don't. End of.
I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.

Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.

You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.

Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.

But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
I am telling you that it isn't a thing. I am not debating it. I am telling you something.
You're 'telling' me a load of old bollocks.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: weight bullies

Post by Cyclops »

Coco wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 17:25 If you are comfortable at the weight you are fighting at the wrong weight
And some people are more 'comfortable' at cutting weight than others. It's a cliche, but MMA has a HUGE problem with guys (and gals) cutting weight. I don't follow it particularly, but didn't they only ban IV rehydration in the past couple of years? Or are they still allowed to do it?
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Re: weight bullies

Post by knockout »

Weight cutting was previously purely a natural talent like having fast hands or a good chin.

More recently it’s been taken advantage of by those who have the best access to PEDs etc

In its purest form it’s not cheating ... no more “bully” than calling someone who hits harder than an opponent a bully .. it’s just unfair :)

Having said that I would much prefer the middleweight championship to be contested by two 160lb guys like it used to be. Not a 180lb guy and a 170lb guy
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: weight bullies

Post by Cyclops »

rob h wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 17:15 No, it's isn't incompatible with the question. Weight cutting has been part of the sport for generations but is more prevalent now due to sports science. If you want to get to a decent level, you need to cut weight.
I think people's issues with it are that, in some examples, if somebody comes in with a clear weight advantage despite weighing in the same as the opponent it might be possible evidence of some sort of cheating.

That's why there's still an ongoing argument amongst some people that we should return to same day weigh-ins.

I'd be up for that, so long as people could prove they weren't dehydrated to the point of it being dangerous on fight night just to make the weight. We all know that they gave them a day to re-hydrate after the weigh in to make it safer, but if you think that nobody has ever exploited that 24 hour rule then we've got a very naive person on our hands.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: weight bullies

Post by Cyclops »

knockout wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 17:50 I would much prefer the middleweight championship to be contested by two 160lb guys like it used to be. Not a 180lb guy and a 170lb guy
Agreed.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26629
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: weight bullies

Post by KiwiRider »

watsupdoc87 wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 17:23
KiwiRider wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 15:13 Zurdo.
Weight bullied his way to 40-0, hung onto his belt in a death grip without facing anyone decent, moves up to LHW and faces even lesser opponents :doh:
What a c*ckgobbler :wave:
Is he still going? I ain't heard a peep from him in a couple years :bag:
The answer is not a lot, he does have a match with the ghost of Barrera.
A perfect opponent seeing as Hart just beat him and Zurdo beat Hart twice :zzz:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103145
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: weight bullies

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Bellew was a domestic weight billy at 175.. had two world title shots and lost.. then moved up to his true weight class CW. I would have loved to see him fighting Drozd for the WBC belt and not vacant. We’ll see if he would have won the belt then.

Also, paid Briedis step aside and had him fight Valilly on the Bellew-Flores undercard, then vacated afterwards.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by margaret thatcher »

its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger

on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too

now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: weight bullies

Post by Cyclops »

margaret thatcher wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 20:02 its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger

on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too

now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
I can't be bothered to check, but was there much of a weight discrepancy when Briedis brutally knocked Charr into next week?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by margaret thatcher »

cant be bothered either, but prob about 50 pounds id think

cracking ko too, the shot looked so effortless and like briedis put nothing into it, but big manny sure went to sleep
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9188
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: weight bullies

Post by gregregegg »

margaret thatcher wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 20:42 cant be bothered either, but prob about 50 pounds id think

cracking ko too, the shot looked so effortless and like briedis put nothing into it, but big manny sure went to sleep
31 lb. 245 and 214.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by margaret thatcher »

ah, okay, not as much as i'd thought
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: weight bullies

Post by Counter-puncher »

Cyclops wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:38
emallini wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 16:17 A weight bully does not exist. This is a made up term by Internet fans. You do not hear that in boxing gyms. It does not exist. You either make the weight or you don't. End of.
I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.

Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.

You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.

Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.

But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
:TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: weight bullies

Post by Counter-puncher »

margaret thatcher wrote: 07 Jun 2021, 20:02 its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger

on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys?
that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too

now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
my guess is that a genetic predisposition (or not) for cutting weight, is secondary to the scientific knowledge/ whatever cheats they use. IE having the right team in place (with all that entails) a bigger factor than genetics, though i stand to be corrected on that
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: weight bullies

Post by Dioufy »

Always been a fan of the idea of having a weigh in 24hrs before with a weigh in on fight day with a determined allowed increase… say 2/3kg max.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6560
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: weight bullies

Post by JamesPhilips »

Dioufy wrote: 08 Jun 2021, 06:58 Always been a fan of the idea of having a weigh in 24hrs before with a weigh in on fight day with a determined allowed increase… say 2/3kg max.
I wonder if that rule would result in a lot of last minute fight cancellations however? Or it could mean fighters won't be able to rehydrate properly.
Post Reply