Re: Anthony Joshua and Louis Theroux
Posted: 10 Nov 2023, 16:03
Quickeysavile alert!!


Paul Theroux is my favourite author. A really interesting & intelligent man. He brought back modern day travel writing.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023, 13:02
his autobiography is worth a read, very self deprecating. His father was very famous, interesting upbringing Louis had.
He is a beautiful writer. I love The Kingdom by the Sea and The Great Railway Bazaar. His essays are really wonderful, too.Taansend wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 03:16Paul Theroux is my favourite author. A really interesting & intelligent man. He brought back modern day travel writing.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023, 13:02
his autobiography is worth a read, very self deprecating. His father was very famous, interesting upbringing Louis had.
Happy Isles of Oceania is my personal favourite book of his.
I watched Halm Moon Street then found it was an adaptation of one of his books and got into reading his work that way.Taansend wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 03:16Paul Theroux is my favourite author. A really interesting & intelligent man. He brought back modern day travel writing.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023, 13:02
his autobiography is worth a read, very self deprecating. His father was very famous, interesting upbringing Louis had.
Happy Isles of Oceania is my personal favourite book of his.
i just found out what the Foe button is for
big lennox wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 04:18Paul Theroux is a beautiful writer. I love The Kingdom by the Sea and The Great Railway Bazaar. His essays are really wonderful, too.Taansend wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 03:16Paul Theroux is my favourite author. A really interesting & intelligent man. He brought back modern day travel writing.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023, 13:02
his autobiography is worth a read, very self deprecating. His father was very famous, interesting upbringing Louis had.
Happy Isles of Oceania is my personal favourite book of his.
Have you read Living in 'Sir.Vidia's Shadow', where he tears into V.S.Naipaul? It's an epic takedown.
Sorry (no I’m not tbh)
Totally agreeSeanBrennan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:26 finished watching it now, AJ comes across well, there's some vulnerability there which I did not expect to see, best bit was him going back to his old house and also at his aunties. He also spoke well about helping people financially as in not minding people needing help.
Yeah I agree with you watched it with the Mrs last night, though Louis was a bit of a prick at times but AJ kept his cool with him.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:26 finished watching it now, AJ comes across well, there's some vulnerability there which I did not expect to see, best bit was him going back to his old house and also at his aunties. He also spoke well about helping people financially as in not minding people needing help.
I agree mate. Gareth Davies managed to be annoying in the 30 seconds he featured. I laughed that Chisora got himself in it.si7dog7 wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:32Totally agreeSeanBrennan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:26 finished watching it now, AJ comes across well, there's some vulnerability there which I did not expect to see, best bit was him going back to his old house and also at his aunties. He also spoke well about helping people financially as in not minding people needing help.
I’m not a fan of his, boxing wise.
But
He’s a human like us all. He’s got his foibles but I don’t see any lying in him.
He is good enough to beat most atm
he was wasn't he, he's always managed to be a bit of a prick at times and manage not to get punched despite interviewing some absolute loons like KKK, mad Bible people, and so on. It's quite a feat.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:51Yeah I agree with you watched it with the Mrs last night, though Louis was a bit of a prick at times but AJ kept his cool with him.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 16:26 finished watching it now, AJ comes across well, there's some vulnerability there which I did not expect to see, best bit was him going back to his old house and also at his aunties. He also spoke well about helping people financially as in not minding people needing help.
Dont think anyone except friends of tommy two names gives a fck fellaCallowland wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 19:40 Theroux tried to get some truth out of Saville with the allegations about him when he was filming him. The least he could have done with Joshua is broach the BLM speech he made to at least to gauge a reaction. That would have been a lot less toxic than the questions he posed to Saville.
agreed, bore off with morons trying to stir up an angle re AJ being a racist, this angle is for me the determinant of whether someone is a wankerblanca wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 18:15Dont think anyone except friends of tommy two names gives a fck fellaCallowland wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 19:40 Theroux tried to get some truth out of Saville with the allegations about him when he was filming him. The least he could have done with Joshua is broach the BLM speech he made to at least to gauge a reaction. That would have been a lot less toxic than the questions he posed to Saville.
I beg to differ. He definitely made the speech. It's controversial. Theroux should have challenged it like he challenged Saville. Isn't that what these people are meant to do. I remember reading what Fury said about it, in terms of him making similar comments. He said he wouldn't hear the end of it. Why does Joshua get immunity and a free pass. What about threatening to crack students' jaws in Loughborough. It's the BBC and Theroux being too lightweight.blanca wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 18:15Dont think anyone except friends of tommy two names gives a fck fellaCallowland wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 19:40 Theroux tried to get some truth out of Saville with the allegations about him when he was filming him. The least he could have done with Joshua is broach the BLM speech he made to at least to gauge a reaction. That would have been a lot less toxic than the questions he posed to Saville.
So tell me why the speech isn't controversial then, and should be air brushed into non-existence.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 19:04agreed, bore off with morons trying to stir up an angle re AJ being a racist, this angle is for me the determinant of whether someone is a wankerblanca wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 18:15Dont think anyone except friends of tommy two names gives a fck fellaCallowland wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 19:40 Theroux tried to get some truth out of Saville with the allegations about him when he was filming him. The least he could have done with Joshua is broach the BLM speech he made to at least to gauge a reaction. That would have been a lot less toxic than the questions he posed to Saville.
I feel like I’ve inadvertently stumbled upon an old episode of Newsnight Reviewbig lennox wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 04:18He is a beautiful writer. I love The Kingdom by the Sea and The Great Railway Bazaar. His essays are really wonderful, too.Taansend wrote: ↑11 Nov 2023, 03:16Paul Theroux is my favourite author. A really interesting & intelligent man. He brought back modern day travel writing.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑10 Nov 2023, 13:02
his autobiography is worth a read, very self deprecating. His father was very famous, interesting upbringing Louis had.
Happy Isles of Oceania is my personal favourite book of his.
Have you read Living in 'Sir.Vidia's Shadow', where he tears into V.S.Naipaul? It's an epic takedown.
Basically, the press have buried it, and that's saved him, because they could ruin you. As I mentioned about Fury, if he'd made comparable comments he'd be finished and Fury knows it. Joshua has had a bit of good fortune, a bit like his boxing career. It must be remembered that speech was made during a highented part of UK's history and he should have known better. Parts of it were definitely Inflammatory. I agree Theroux should have addressed it, and it's not Joshua's fault he didn't. I think we may have seen a different side to the interview if he did, and that is balance. That speech was not minor, it happened and it was said. I would say to Joshua don't take my hard earned money paying for tickets and PPV's and insult people. That's a fair analogy.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 19:31 i think most people are past it and just don't really care much anymore tbh. 3 years ago he said to shop in black owned businesses, it's not comparable to decades worth of allegations of sexually abusing children
I think most would agree that Fury made worse comments than AJ has yet clearly isn’t finished.Callowland wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023, 03:56Basically, the press have buried it, and that's saved him, because they could ruin you. As I mentioned about Fury, if he'd made comparable comments he'd be finished and Fury knows it. Joshua has had a bit of good fortune, a bit like his boxing career. It must be remembered that speech was made during a highented part of UK's history and he should have known better. Parts of it were definitely Inflammatory. I agree Theroux should have addressed it, and it's not Joshua's fault he didn't. I think we may have seen a different side to the interview if he did, and that is balance. That speech was not minor, it happened and it was said. I would say to Joshua don't take my hard earned money paying for tickets and PPV's and insult people. That's a fair analogy.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Nov 2023, 19:31 i think most people are past it and just don't really care much anymore tbh. 3 years ago he said to shop in black owned businesses, it's not comparable to decades worth of allegations of sexually abusing children