How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6530
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by JamesPhilips »

SeanBrennan wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 12:31 He was a more successful boxer than hare courser we know that much.
And his woman beating skills looked pretty impressive too
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6530
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by JamesPhilips »

Coco wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 08:04 Very good in fairness

There was little in the fight v Canelo until he quit
Totally agree. BJS was looking good until that shot
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32905
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

tigermoth87 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 11:14
Cbarnes19 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 02:29
tigermoth87 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 02:07 Your typical B-level British World Champion.

Good wins against other B-level fighters, Some soft title defences because his handlers know if he faced the elite he would lose. Faced an elite fighter and got smoked.

Also very boring to watch.
I’d definitely agree on the boring part and the poor defences however I think talent wise he was definitely above B-level just never really rose to the occasion and had the career he should have.
He definitely had talent. But I can't put him higher than B because he never beat anyone higher than that level. His best win is arguably Lee, Lemieux or Eubank Jr. Who are all firmly B level fighters--good names to have on a resume of course, but you would never call either of them world class. I guess B+ is a better ranking to put him. He was above the B level fighters, but never proved himself against any of the genuine top level fighters in the division.
Totally dominated Martin Murray too, albeit right at the end of his career. Would say only GGG beat him more convincingly.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 13:37
SeanBrennan wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 12:31 He was a more successful boxer than hare courser we know that much.
And his woman beating skills looked pretty impressive too
This is why I don’t like him. Having grown up watching a traveller batter his woman, in this instance my Ma, it is clear he is a misogynistic scumbag.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9903
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by SeanBrennan »

There is a wider very non PC debate about that community’s views towards women. Best left off boxing forum. But BJS is symptomatic of a cultural malaise with that community that I experienced first hand and is why I particularly despise him. He masks his awful narcissism in culture and humour as opposed to what it is, neo-feudal abuse.

Personally having been in care, I’d happily see all offspring of his ilk put in care with a therapeutic pathway support their recovery as it’s that stark in terms of impact. Not all cultures deserve respect. We indulge their behaviours at our peril. My half cousin wrote a book that is a best seller about his life, a gay traveller. It tells you all you need to know about their community.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3357
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

JamesPhilips wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 13:37
SeanBrennan wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 12:31 He was a more successful boxer than hare courser we know that much.
And his woman beating skills looked pretty impressive too
Same level as Floyd / Tank / Shakur ??
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1471
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Bigdogsnose »

If you were nitpicking, which is easy to do with a bell end like billy, there’s not many boxers on his resume. Fought a lot of fighters, but not many with his stellar background.

Probably slightly off with timings and weight categories but would have loved to see how he would have fared against groves or degale. Think they both beat him.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6530
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by JamesPhilips »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 17:46
JamesPhilips wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 13:37
SeanBrennan wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 12:31 He was a more successful boxer than hare courser we know that much.
And his woman beating skills looked pretty impressive too
Same level as Floyd / Tank / Shakur ??
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
a force
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 782
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 20:23

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by a force »

Good fighter but lacking a little something to be any more than a belt holder.

I thought he beat Eubank & Ryder but only just.

Both were 115-113 type fight. I’ve never bought this nonsense that he schooled Eubank.

Andy Lee was his best win. Maybe Lee was slightly past it but it was still a clear win over a title winner.

His big problem was that he faded in the second half of nearly every title fight.

Some were making out he was doing well in the Canelo fight because it wasn’t one sided up until the last round but Saunders needed to have a clear lead by the half way stage to have any chance & I only gave him two rounds.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39324
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by margaret thatcher »

i had canelo well ahead vs bjs, always thought people gave him too much credit for that one, i actually agree with the canelo judges for once on that one. besides, as mentioned,, it was the 2nd half billy struggled, and almost as soon as that hit vs canelo he was 1 eyed and getting battered

a truly elite fighter would not have had as many close calls vs the level of opposition he did. at that level. so many narrow decisions or the fight like coceres which was about even before the finish. and of course his 1 fight vs a true p4p he quit.

but he showed more than enough to prove genuine world class
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39324
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 15:21
tigermoth87 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 11:14
Cbarnes19 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 02:29

I’d definitely agree on the boring part and the poor defences however I think talent wise he was definitely above B-level just never really rose to the occasion and had the career he should have.
He definitely had talent. But I can't put him higher than B because he never beat anyone higher than that level. His best win is arguably Lee, Lemieux or Eubank Jr. Who are all firmly B level fighters--good names to have on a resume of course, but you would never call either of them world class. I guess B+ is a better ranking to put him. He was above the B level fighters, but never proved himself against any of the genuine top level fighters in the division.
Totally dominated Martin Murray too, albeit right at the end of his career. Would say only GGG beat him more convincingly.
see to me that is just superficial resume stacking.....murray was done and there is a reason it was his last fight

already 5 years earlier groves too had given him a heck of a beating and hurt him about a dozen times
golden_labrador
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1783
Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by golden_labrador »

SeanBrennan wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 15:37 There is a wider very non PC debate about that community’s views towards women. Best left off boxing forum. But BJS is symptomatic of a cultural malaise with that community that I experienced first hand and is why I particularly despise him. He masks his awful narcissism in culture and humour as opposed to what it is, neo-feudal abuse.

Personally having been in care, I’d happily see all offspring of his ilk put in care with a therapeutic pathway support their recovery as it’s that stark in terms of impact. Not all cultures deserve respect. We indulge their behaviours at our peril. My half cousin wrote a book that is a best seller about his life, a gay traveller. It tells you all you need to know about their community.
the poor kids
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3340
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Twinkle Toes »

a force wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 18:17 Good fighter but lacking a little something to be any more than a belt holder.

I thought he beat Eubank & Ryder but only just.

Both were 115-113 type fight. I’ve never bought this nonsense that he schooled Eubank.

Andy Lee was his best win. Maybe Lee was slightly past it but it was still a clear win over a title winner.

His big problem was that he faded in the second half of nearly every title fight.

Some were making out he was doing well in the Canelo fight because it wasn’t one sided up until the last round but Saunders needed to have a clear lead by the half way stage to have any chance & I only gave him two rounds.
Pretty much how I see it :salut:
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3222
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by smiling assassin »

The man was world class over 6 rounds just a shame for him championship boxing is 12 rounds.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32905
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

margaret thatcher wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 19:07
Boxerbeetle wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 15:21
tigermoth87 wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 11:14

He definitely had talent. But I can't put him higher than B because he never beat anyone higher than that level. His best win is arguably Lee, Lemieux or Eubank Jr. Who are all firmly B level fighters--good names to have on a resume of course, but you would never call either of them world class. I guess B+ is a better ranking to put him. He was above the B level fighters, but never proved himself against any of the genuine top level fighters in the division.
Totally dominated Martin Murray too, albeit right at the end of his career. Would say only GGG beat him more convincingly.
see to me that is just superficial resume stacking.....murray was done and there is a reason it was his last fight

already 5 years earlier groves too had given him a heck of a beating and hurt him about a dozen times
I bet he was still riding high in Horse’s Top 10 British P4P list tho :yay:
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5163
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Stop spamming.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28477
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Coco »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 21 Sep 2025, 05:43
margaret thatcher wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 19:07
Boxerbeetle wrote: 20 Sep 2025, 15:21

Totally dominated Martin Murray too, albeit right at the end of his career. Would say only GGG beat him more convincingly.
see to me that is just superficial resume stacking.....murray was done and there is a reason it was his last fight

already 5 years earlier groves too had given him a heck of a beating and hurt him about a dozen times
I bet he was still riding high in Horse’s Top 10 British P4P list tho :yay:
:clap: :clap: :bow: :bow:
Cbarnes19
Super Lightweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 09:39

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Cbarnes19 »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 21 Sep 2025, 05:49 Stop spamming.
?
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12016
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Taansend »

Many British fighters have a lot to learn when it comes to nutrition BETWEEN fights, not just while in training.

It really does make a difference. Especially later in their career.

Billy Joe had world class talent but not a world class brain.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102878
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Yh a lot of British boxers don’t live the lifestyle.

I mean it’s a short career as it is. Live the lifestyle.

Brook, Hatton were others as well.

The HW’s are mostly just fat now.
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3583
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Cent0089 »

Well, Canelo was at his very prime when BJS fought him and he did solid until that fatal punch IMO. So i think he was very good, but wasted his talent on mediocre fights. His win over Eubank is somewhat underrated
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102878
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Cent0089 wrote: 24 Sep 2025, 14:20 His win over Eubank is somewhat underrated
He just about won that too
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23057
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by mickey1975 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 24 Sep 2025, 14:41
Cent0089 wrote: 24 Sep 2025, 14:20 His win over Eubank is somewhat underrated
He just about won that too
Again, he pissed the first half of the fight.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by big lennox »

A very skilful fighter. Really talented.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4511
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: How good Billy was Joe Saunders really?

Post by NazNaci1 »

He was a really good, skillful fighter.

Definitely, in that era, in the top half.

A bit of a spanner but you can't knock his talent.
Post Reply