Posted: 19 Oct 2006, 06:59
Beyer barely missed to the body though.
Beyer although losing wasn't doing too badly.
Beyer although losing wasn't doing too badly.
Agree 100%Deram wrote:Beyer was being utterly dominated the entire fight. I dare anyone to find 10 seconds that Beyer won in that fight!
He was dominated and then knocked out with beautiful precision after less than 3 rounds.
Beautiful stuff.
The fact you're gonna try to even find something wrong in the 8 minutes that they fought is ridiculous. Beyer landed what, maybe 30 punches? Seriously, stop trying to degrade a fantastic performance.Max Molyneux wrote:Deram wrote:Beyer was being utterly dominated the entire fight. I dare anyone to find 10 seconds that Beyer won in that fight!
He was dominated and then knocked out with beautiful precision after less than 3 rounds.
It was no Calzaghe and Lacy though.
Beyer wasn't missing to the body. He was also keeping his guard high up for Kessler's straights.
I wouldn't worry about Joe slipping too much, he has a habit of not putting himself fully into every fight (Salem being a very visable case)Terence wrote:I think there could be some slippage on Joe also. His reflexes looked off the other night. Maybe it was lethargy?
My big worry is that with some sportsmen their most punch-perfect performance is followed by rapid slippage. Everything seems to come together perfectly for a fight/period and then it unravels quickly.
I like Hopkins to win a few rounds in a propose fight as he is one of the rare guys who can take this type of thing into account and adjust.
I like Taylor in this fight right now, I am not saying he will win. He is the type of guy who you can imagine rising to the occasion and if he took this in 2-3 fights he would be razor sharp at the highest level.
Take what Joe has and add it with Taylor's early resume and you have a potent mix. If HBO smiles on you big fights happen.
Christ don't get me wrong, Bernard would have his moments, but I think that Calzaghe would take over in the latter half and really give Bernard a torrid time.Terence wrote:I think there could be some slippage on Joe also. His reflexes looked off the other night. Maybe it was lethargy?
My big worry is that with some sportsmen their most punch-perfect performance is followed by rapid slippage. Everything seems to come together perfectly for a fight/period and then it unravels quickly.
I like Hopkins to win a few rounds in a propose fight as he is one of the rare guys who can take this type of thing into account and adjust.
I like Taylor in this fight right now, I am not saying he will win. He is the type of guy who you can imagine rising to the occasion and if he took this in 2-3 fights he would be razor sharp at the highest level.
Take what Joe has and add it with Taylor's early resume and you have a potent mix. If HBO smiles on you big fights happen.
Good point, he did come pretty far down off of his win vs Lacy. He looked far from good, which by comparison to the last time the world saw Joe fight, doesn't help much.Matty, yeah Joe does fight down to the level of his opponent, on Saturday he came right the way down though. Hopefully it is just a blip. When Joe fights Kessler we all want both men to be 110%.
Wuss. :PI do not fancy gonig to Wales and freezing my 'nads off, and let them go at it. I am sure the second-tier will be jumping for that one.
Oh, please - and *you* omit to mention that this is the same Mario Veit that Joe had KOd in under 2 minutes flat just a few years before.neverwin wrote:I have a minor criticism regarding your point about travelling. You omit to mention that Calazghe went to Germany last year to make his mandatory defence against Veit.
I know he only went because they lost the purse bids and people will knock Veit but he won every round on every card before the TKO.
He wanted to fight Brian Magee, not Veit. Veit picked up the interim crown. Universum won purse bids for Calzaghe-Veit II. They only bothered to let the world know a couple of days before Calzaghe-Magee voluntary defense. Because there was less that 2 months (or 6 weeks, or whateve) between voluntary and mandatory, WBO rules states that he must call of the voluntary. Or lose the title.Eric the Viking wrote:Oh, please - and *you* omit to mention that this is the same Mario Veit that Joe had KOd in under 2 minutes flat just a few years before.neverwin wrote:I have a minor criticism regarding your point about travelling. You omit to mention that Calazghe went to Germany last year to make his mandatory defence against Veit.
I know he only went because they lost the purse bids and people will knock Veit but he won every round on every card before the TKO.
Taking a 2-hour plane ride to face a guy you smashed to bits once before isn't exactly what I'd consider "taking a risk." The previous crushing win would've eliminated any home-crowd boost Veit might've otherwise felt. Not that such would've helped him - the skills disparity had already been established as being too great - but you make it out like Joe was entering the Lion's den or some such feat of biblical proportions.
Sorry, but Frickin' Mario Veit as a some kind of impressive notch on the 'ol fistic résumé ... bwahahahahahaha...
Markussen was KO'd on the Kessler undercard.Max Molyneux wrote:As for Rudy Markussen being mandatory, did he fight an eliminator?
Veit was Joes last mandatory.
They made sure if the decisions were close, it go closer to whoever they hyped up best way.Terence wrote:Are you wise? Wales in Winter? Surrounded by leek-munchers? It would be a case of 'The Wickerman II'Max Molyneux wrote:Wuss. :PI do not fancy gonig to Wales and freezing my 'nads off, and let them go at it. I am sure the second-tier will be jumping for that one.
Don't think HBO will risk Taylor to Calzaghe as Taylor's their poster boy.![]()
Yeah, HBO really babied Tayor with those Hopkins fights followed by Wright!