Page 2 of 4
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 08:50
by WildWaylon
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:We could have a should plopeater be banned poll and forward the results to the site owner
He is a bit of a plonker. Young teenager I think, but surely stepinfetchit should be top of the list for banning. Everyone of his posts are abusive and offensive.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 08:52
by DG.
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Boxrec used to have very high standards of poster but the new additions are spoiling it a bit and making it reminicent of the general forum at ESB (ie kids in the playground)
Here's an idea LIMIT THE NUMBER OF DAILY POSTS FOR TROLLS, With repeat offending GETTING BANS - its the only way.
Plopeater is clearly a troll and should be banned ASAP, he ruins thread and is either Spud, Search, DG, Stepinfetchit or Simpsons
How dare you suggest I am plopeater!
Go and nutrition yourself!
Idiot.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 09:04
by plopeater
WildWaylon wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:We could have a should plopeater be banned poll and forward the results to the site owner
He is a bit of a plonker. Young teenager I think, but surely stepinfetchit should be top of the list for banning. Everyone of his posts are abusive and offensive.
I am a youthful 31. I was feeling down but seeing Hatton fight makes me feel a teen again.
Plonker, who are you delboy
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 10:30
by El Raincoat
I think the point that is trying to be made to plopeater is that your posts come across as very naive for instance suggesting Ricky Hatton was unlucky against Mayweather when everyone clearly knows he got a whoppin.
I believe everyone should be given a fair crack of th ewhip but some things that you say are a little out there however plopeater do some research into other fighters check
http://www.youtube.com and watch Castillo-Corrales 1, Morales-Barrera 1,2,3, Gatti-Ward 1,2,3 and you'll realise what a brillaint action packed fight is.
Feel free to drop me a line and i'll help/advise whatever you on a few things.
Best of luck welcome to the Boxing world.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 11:51
by tonyevs
A difference in views is one thing .. maybe Hatton could be said to be unlucky in regard to his fight with Mayweather .. unlucky to get Joe Cortez
I find the site has lost/is losing credibility with its posters with the continuous Hatton infatuasion by certain posters having an unhealthy obsession with a Hatton v Witter match-up

.. regardless of who people thinks wins .. Hatton has made it clear he has no desire for a match with Witter .. so why don`t people move on?
Hatton owes us nothing .. he, like the majority of boxers puts it on the line everytime he steps through those ropes .. regardless who he`s facing ..
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 11:55
by DG.
tonyevs wrote:A difference in views is one thing .. maybe Hatton could be said to be unlucky in regard to his fight with Mayweather .. unlucky to get Joe Cortez
I find the site has lost/is losing credibility with its posters with the continuous Hatton infatuasion by certain posters having an unhealthy obsession with a Hatton v Witter match-up

.. regardless of who people thinks wins .. Hatton has made it clear he has no desire for a match with Witter .. so why don`t people move on?
Hatton owes us nothing .. he, like the majority of boxers puts it on the line everytime he steps through those ropes .. regardless who he`s facing ..
To be great you must do great things.
javascript:emoticon(':D')
javascript:emoticon(':D')
Hatton is not and does not.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 11:59
by Neri
I don't think it's the Hatton-Witter obsession bringing the forum down, it's not that easy to let go of. We all know,it's an absolute shambles that this fight is not happening and probably never will. Hatton is one of my favorite fighters but his numerous excuses are making him look very hypocritical. Okay i don't make multiple hatton hate threads about my feelings but I can understand where this dislike is coming from.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 12:01
by Chambers2
Plopeater is obviously a wind up merchant who has more boxing knowledge than he lets on, no genuine poster joins with a name like his and nobody can be as thick as he makes out.
Ban the prick first ask questions later

Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 13:28
by Mimmy
plopeater wrote:WildWaylon wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:We could have a should plopeater be banned poll and forward the results to the site owner
He is a bit of a plonker. Young teenager I think, but surely stepinfetchit should be top of the list for banning. Everyone of his posts are abusive and offensive.
I am a youthful 31. I was feeling down but seeing Hatton fight makes me feel a teen again.
Plonker, who are you delboy
wow what a topic, when i saw the name plopeater, i thought what a disgusting name because in the UK 'plop' is obviously poo poo or shit to anyone who does not know. Why on earth would anyone call themselves plopeater on a forum board such as Boxrec. I could understand you choosing a name like that if it was on a scat forum or a similar porn board.
also wheni catually see the name plopeater i bypass your threads or skip your reply because i get the impression that the topic will be something odd or something pornographic.
In my opinion sexual or anything innuendo names should be banned. pardon me but thats my opinion.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 13:46
by dondada
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Boxrec used to have very high standards of poster but the new additions are spoiling it a bit and making it reminicent of the general forum at ESB (ie kids in the playground)
Here's an idea LIMIT THE NUMBER OF DAILY POSTS FOR TROLLS, With repeat offending GETTING BANS - its the only way.
Plopeater is clearly a troll and should be banned ASAP, he ruins thread and is either Spud, Search, DG, Stepinfetchit or Simpsons
Don't have time to read this thread (or many others these days) but have to say that Spud is NOT a troll.
Just because many of you don't like him doesn't mean he's a troll. A troll is someone who deliberately goes out of his way to goad people and doesn't really care about what they write as long as it gets a reaction from others.
Spud might get a reaction from others but he actually believes what he says!
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 13:59
by Neri
I quite like reading Spuds inside info and opinions.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 14:22
by The Law
SandySadler and Billythekid have recently been removed (for differing reasons, which I won't go into), and if plopeater continues to act like a troll then he will also be banned. He has been given every opportunity to improve his behaviour.
This is currently being looked into and if you ever have any complaints about a member then send a private message to a Mod. Thanks
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 15:37
by Shirow
mimmy123 wrote:
wow what a topic, when i saw the name plopeater, i thought what a disgusting name because in the UK 'plop' is obviously poo poo or shit to anyone who does not know. Why on earth would anyone call themselves plopeater on a forum board such as Boxrec. I could understand you choosing a name like that if it was on a scat forum or a similar porn board.
also wheni catually see the name plopeater i bypass your threads or skip your reply because i get the impression that the topic will be something odd or something pornographic.
In my opinion sexual or anything innuendo names should be banned. pardon me but thats my opinion.
You may be interested to know that mimmy is New Zealand slang for wee.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 15:44
by DG.
search wrote:Neri wrote:I quite like reading Spuds inside info and opinions.
The problem with Spud is that there is usually always a hidden agenda in what he writes. When Hatton was with Warren Spud couldn't criticise him enough and was telling all and sundry that Witter would Ko him and Hatton was avoiding him. Of course, he was working for Hennessy then. When he began working for Hobson low and behold Hatton would beat Witter according to Spud. Everyone is also accustomed to his, "I know something you dont but can't reveal it for another 15 hours so you'll have to wait" sh*t.
Not to mention he banned most of the members here from other boards in the past when they posted things that went against what the company he worked for would have wanted.
Yes, sounds about right!
Spud, how is Tunceh Tye Rac ( Carey the Cu.....Spelt backwards!)
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 15:49
by Spud
DG - seen as you asked Ben is okay. For me regardless of what anyone says he is one of the very best writers on the sport on the net.
He gets married this year to a lovely lass - I am going along for a hopefully some decent scoff and a beer or two - I hope Carey has a stag night - I will stitch him up good and proper!!!
Hello young lady

- know you are reading this - only kidding I promise he won't get into any trouble.
Ben continues to write articles and will hate me for highlighting his stuff - here is his latest:
Ben Carey - Junior Witter Article.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 15:55
by DG.
Spud wrote:DG - seen as you asked Ben is okay. For me regardless of what anyone says he is one of the very best writers on the sport on the net.
He gets married this year to a lovely lass - I am going along for a hopefully some decent scoff and a beer or two - I hope Carey has a stag night - I will stitch him up good and proper!!!
Hello young lady

- know you are reading this - only kidding I promise he won't get into any trouble.
Ben continues to write articles and will hate me for highlighting his stuff - here is his latest:
Ben Carey - Junior Witter Article.
I actually thginnk Tunche Tye Rac is ok, but you two went on some crazy power trip on Boxing talk, so I joined as Tunche Tye Rac and had many a conversation with Ben unitl he realised what it meant and who I was!
Oh how I laughed!
BC is actually ok by me.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 15:59
by Spud
search wrote:Neri wrote:I quite like reading Spuds inside info and opinions.
The problem with Spud is that there is usually always a hidden agenda in what he writes. When Hatton was with Warren Spud couldn't criticise him enough and was telling all and sundry that Witter would Ko him and Hatton was avoiding him. Of course, he was working for Hennessy then. When he began working for Hobson low and behold Hatton would beat Witter according to Spud. Everyone is also accustomed to his, "I know something you dont but can't reveal it for another 15 hours so you'll have to wait" sh*t.
Not to mention he banned most of the members here from other boards in the past when they posted things that went against what the company he worked for would have wanted.
Search - lets be accurate here - did I go over the top for whoever's "Tea Boy" I was - of course I did - and looking back other than the abuse on here it did me no harm whatsoever - what I have got up to in boxing is down to bare faced cheek, good old fashioned hard graft and playing the boxing game when necessary.
I have no problems in stating I got up to a lot of what people will perceive as wrong - but how about some honesty from some on here who have found it all too convenient to jump on the spud bashing wagon!!! -
it's called jealousy and when the abuse has flowed on here and elsewhere - if I were perfectly honest it made me wind some of you c*nts up even more!!!
My attitude is the past is the past - I look back and think what a lucky, fortunate, spawny b*stard boxing fan I have been and what is more I do not regret winding up a lot of people around here up!!! - why - because they have done exactly the same to me in this mad dog eat dog world.
I honestly hope the mods close this and other threads where the abuse seems to flow all too conventiently and easily - lets discuss boxing and keep to boxing - British Boxing is going through a fantastic period - there is no need for "Spud Bashing" threads to keep boxrec busy!!!
KEEP TO BOXING!!!!
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 16:05
by DG.
Spud wrote:search wrote:Neri wrote:I quite like reading Spuds inside info and opinions.
The problem with Spud is that there is usually always a hidden agenda in what he writes. When Hatton was with Warren Spud couldn't criticise him enough and was telling all and sundry that Witter would Ko him and Hatton was avoiding him. Of course, he was working for Hennessy then. When he began working for Hobson low and behold Hatton would beat Witter according to Spud. Everyone is also accustomed to his, "I know something you dont but can't reveal it for another 15 hours so you'll have to wait" sh*t.
Not to mention he banned most of the members here from other boards in the past when they posted things that went against what the company he worked for would have wanted.
Search - lets be accurate here - did I go over the top for whoever's "Tea Boy" I was - of course I did - and looking back other than the abuse on here it did me no harm whatsoever - what I have got up to in boxing is down to bare faced cheek, good old fashioned hard graft and playing the boxing game when necessary.
I have no problems in stating I got up to a lot of what people will perceive as wrong - but how about some honesty from some on here who have found it all too convenient to jump on the spud bashing wagon!!! -
it's called jealousy and when the abuse has flowed on here and elsewhere - if I were perfectly honest it made me wind some of you c*nts up even more!!!
My attitude is the past is the past - I look back and think what a lucky, fortunate, spawny b*stard boxing fan I have been and what is more I do not regret winding up a lot of people around here up!!! - why - because they have done exactly the same to me in this mad dog eat dog world.
I honestly hope the mods close this and other threads where the abuse seems to flow all too conventiently and easily - lets discuss boxing and keep to boxing - British Boxing is going through a fantastic period - there is no need for "Spud Bashing" threads to keep boxrec busy!!!
KEEP TO BOXING!!!!
I can honestly say I have never really had a dislike for SPUD, when he was being a choice GIT!
Its a forum and no one should get too carried away...HOWEVER our resident tranny ( HitmanHatton1) is taking the piss!
As long as Boxrec don't make SPUD a mod it will be OK - if they did then this forum will get shut down!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 16:08
by Spud
DG,
I have applied for the job as mod on here and I have been accepted - stujones and a couple of others nominated me and stated they could not do without me - my condition of employment was they made "boxing twat" a MOD too - and finally they ban RHINO!!!
All of my conditions are being met!!!

Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 16:09
by Mimmy
Shirow wrote:mimmy123 wrote:
wow what a topic, when i saw the name plopeater, i thought what a disgusting name because in the UK 'plop' is obviously poo poo or shit to anyone who does not know. Why on earth would anyone call themselves plopeater on a forum board such as Boxrec. I could understand you choosing a name like that if it was on a scat forum or a similar porn board.
also wheni catually see the name plopeater i bypass your threads or skip your reply because i get the impression that the topic will be something odd or something pornographic.
In my opinion sexual or anything innuendo names should be banned. pardon me but thats my opinion.
You may be interested to know that mimmy is New Zealand slang for wee.
your kidding me! Mimmy is a great name and a great looking girl who was married to Tom Cruise.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 16:11
by DG.
Spud wrote:DG,
I have applied for the job as mod on here and I have been accepted - stujones and a couple of others nominated me and stated they could not do without me - my condition of employment was they made "boxing twat" a MOD too - and finally they ban RHINO!!!
All of my conditions are being met!!!

I predict the forum closes within 5 months!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 16:33
by StepinFetchit
search wrote:Neri wrote:I quite like reading Spuds inside info and opinions.
The problem with Spud is that there is usually always a hidden agenda in what he writes. When Hatton was with Warren Spud couldn't criticise him enough and was telling all and sundry that Witter would Ko him and Hatton was avoiding him. Of course, he was working for Hennessy then. When he began working for Hobson low and behold Hatton would beat Witter according to Spud. Everyone is also accustomed to his, "I know something you dont but can't reveal it for another 15 hours so you'll have to wait" sh*t.
Not to mention he banned most of the members here from other boards in the past when they posted things that went against what the company he worked for would have wanted.

Bang on mate, for me the bloke is rancid........anyone who thinks SPUD is ok knows nothing about British boxing forums, personally i don't know him THANK FOOK....... so many things have been said about this bloke, accusations about him and his mates makes me know some of it must be true.
And your right Search, the way he took over forums in the past time and again banned anyone who called him what he is, creeped to mods and site owners with his "I know something but i can't say" crap.........man, thank fook this forum aint been stupid enough to allow him to wreck here...if they did this forum would end up like EVERY other one he was mod on NO MORE...........it must hurt Spudley a little to know he can do nothing here

Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 17:04
by Gooner123
This thread is pointless now, it was opened to chat about the forum going downhill and now it has turned into a slanging topic, each of you looking to moan about other members, throwing accusations about!
Why don't we add some constructive criticism so we can all improve this forum and stop insulting one another, its the internet there's always going to be people who you don't agree with it.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 17:34
by fist
All this talk of banning...bit over the top unless someone is being abusive, racist etc. Defining certain posts / threads as dsigned with the specific intent of disrupting and anoying is very subjective. For example, that plopeater bloke, havent read too many of his posts, but if al he is doing is voicing his love for Hatton then so be it, its up to him. Either ignore him or educate him. If he becomes abusive, then ban him.
I think you have to be careful when you band around terms like troll. Though clearly some exist - SandySadler being one who deservadly got banned. But if you start banning people cos you think their boxing opinion is naive or simply not agreed with by the majority, then this site will become hugely elitest and boring. I for one would not remain a member of a site that censored according to the subjective opinions of others. Like I said, if someone is aggressive, threatening, abusive, racist... then get rid of them, fair enough.
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 17:53
by SticknMove
Boxrec has been pretty much self moderating (from when I first posted) in that posters have generally been respectful. It seems to me that banned posters from other sites have come on here to continue their online spats using the substance of the game as a battling ram. That all said, a bit of friendly banter is always welcome as long as its not too intentionally offensive.
EDIT