I am talking about Wayne McCullough.Mario wrote:Are you getting Wayne McCulloch mixed up with someone else?
He still hasn't beaten anyone since 1998. 10 years ago, and BEFORE he lost to Naz!
British Top 30 P4P May 2008
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: British Top 30 P4P May 2008
Horse wrote:1. (1.) Joe Calzaghe
2. (2.) Ricky Hatton
3. (3.) David Haye
4. (4.) Junior Witter
5. (5.) Clinton Woods
6. (6.) Alex Arthur
7. (7.) Enzo Maccarinelli
8. (8.) Carl Froch
9. (9.) Scott Harrison
10. (10.) Jamie Moore
11. (11.) Nicky Cook
12. (12.) Gavin Rees
13. (13.) Rendall Munroe
14. (18.) Amir Khan
15. (14.) Bernard Dunne
16. (15.) Matt Skelton
17. (16.) John Duddy
18. (17.) Colin Lynes
19. (19.) Wayne Elcock
20. (20.) Kevin Mitchell
21. (21.) Wayne McCullough
22. (22.) Kevin McIntyre
23. (24.) David Barnes
24. (23.) Jonathan Thaxton
25. (25.) Carl Johanneson
26. (28.) Michael Jennings
27. (26.) Howard Eastman
28. (27.) Tony Oakey
29. (29.) Bradley Pryce
30. (30.) Ian Napa
Why is Napa at number 30?
WTF has Tony Oakey/Pryce/Barnes/Johanssen/Thaxton/Mitchell/Jennings done that is better?
The man is class, just won the3 lonsdale belt outright.
Os achievement alone - that s worthy of a higher place on te list.
How many Lonsdale belt holders on that list? outright holders?
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Robin Hood aka Ricky Hatton can not have a Lonsdale belt to keep if he ha 1 fight - but Witter was given his because NO ONE wanted to fight him!banjo wrote:I'd have Napa much higher as well, I'd also put Colin Lynes top 12.
Speaking of Lonsdale belts, why have Hatton and Witter got Lonsdale belts? Hatton had 1 British title bout and Witter had 2, I thought you had to have 3 bouts to receive one for keeps.
In the old days it was 3 bouts to win the belt outright, but because of the cost of the belt, they changed to 4 fights.
Witter has always scared his opponents.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Napa had not won the Lonsdale belt outright when I posted this list, he will be a good number of places higher next month.DG. wrote:Why is Napa at number 30?
WTF has Tony Oakey/Pryce/Barnes/Johanssen/Thaxton/Mitchell/Jennings done that is better?
The man is class, just won the3 lonsdale belt outright.
Os achievement alone - that s worthy of a higher place on te list.
I believe there are 9. Did Harrison win the Lonsdale belt outright?DG. wrote:How many Lonsdale belt holders on that list? outright holders?
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

thepocketrocket wrote:No, Alan Bosworth at the time was the main challenger and he wasnt seen as acceptable, everyone else had moved on!!
But you know that!!
Witter was way too good to fight.
If Bosworth RAN - then the next availabkle person should get the shot.
People pulled out left right and centre against Witter, just did not want to know!
The point is, THEY ALL RAN from Witter so he was given the belt.
Eastman had the same problem - but he won it outright anyway.
Hatton could have defended agaisnt Witter, BUT HE WAS/IS SCARED?
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Horse wrote:Napa had not won the Lonsdale belt outright when I posted this list, he will be a good number of places higher next month.DG. wrote:Why is Napa at number 30?
WTF has Tony Oakey/Pryce/Barnes/Johanssen/Thaxton/Mitchell/Jennings done that is better?
The man is class, just won the3 lonsdale belt outright.
Os achievement alone - that s worthy of a higher place on te list.
I believe there are 9. Did Harrison win the Lonsdale belt outright?DG. wrote:How many Lonsdale belt holders on that list? outright holders?
I think he did?
Well done Ian Napa, he should be at least number 15 next time!!!
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
If Lynes wins this month I plan on jumping him up a good number of places.banjo wrote:I'd have Napa much higher as well, I'd also put Colin Lynes top 12.
Perhaps, Hatton was given a Lonsdale belt by the board because of his achievements in boxing.banjo wrote:Speaking of Lonsdale belts, why have Hatton and Witter got Lonsdale belts? Hatton had 1 British title bout and Witter had 2, I thought you had to have 3 bouts to receive one for keeps.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Horse wrote:If Lynes wins this month I plan on jumping him up a good number of places.banjo wrote:I'd have Napa much higher as well, I'd also put Colin Lynes top 12.
Perhaps, Hatton was given a Lonsdale belt by the board because of his achievements in boxing.banjo wrote:Speaking of Lonsdale belts, why have Hatton and Witter got Lonsdale belts? Hatton had 1 British title bout and Witter had 2, I thought you had to have 3 bouts to receive one for keeps.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 12452.html
Fwank gave it to him,he did not win it = means F ALL!
Fwank owns the board so he must have told them to give it to him.
Means NOTHING!!!!!
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

twenty six wrote:DG,
Whilst I do respect your views, and apperciate you are running a campaign where Ricky is concerned, you do talk bollocks at times.
Wazza doesn't own the board.
If that were the case, every British Champ would be SN Promoted !
You do know that Fwanky bailed the board out Financially re: the Watson situation.
That is what I meant by saying Fwanky owns the board - of course he does not officially own the board, but what other situation do you know where the governing body is rescued by a 'member'?
Take into account the vested interest angle and you can see where it looks a bit iffy?
Does Bruno have a Lonsdale belt? NO!
Does Benn? NO!
Fwanky 'owns' the board and got Hatton the belt as a bargainingt tool to keep Hatton on board - a Gift!
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43