If 80k is right then fair do's it's a major offer.
However, I was told less than that.
I would prefer to hear it from the horse's mouth than rely upon what boxingchat says about another Promotor's bid.
Wellington ?
Elcock V Macklin - March 7
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7
you're not relying on boxinghcats word for it then?
deserter: I agree with this: I think Smith is the weakest of all four. Barker's the strongest prospect for my money, and I genuinely can't call it out of Elcock and Macklin.
any one of elcock macklin or bendall (or mcdermott IMO) beats Smith, unless he's suddenly grown a boxing brain. IMO
deserter: I agree with this: I think Smith is the weakest of all four. Barker's the strongest prospect for my money, and I genuinely can't call it out of Elcock and Macklin.
any one of elcock macklin or bendall (or mcdermott IMO) beats Smith, unless he's suddenly grown a boxing brain. IMO
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7
What's not to believe from SN mate ? They always tell the truth, don't they ?
Surprised he disclosed their bid though.
Surprised he disclosed their bid though.