Elcock V Macklin - March 7

twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Post by twenty six »

If 80k is right then fair do's it's a major offer.
However, I was told less than that.
I would prefer to hear it from the horse's mouth than rely upon what boxingchat says about another Promotor's bid.
Wellington ?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Post by Counter-puncher »

you're not relying on boxinghcats word for it then? :lol:

deserter: I agree with this: I think Smith is the weakest of all four. Barker's the strongest prospect for my money, and I genuinely can't call it out of Elcock and Macklin.
any one of elcock macklin or bendall (or mcdermott IMO) beats Smith, unless he's suddenly grown a boxing brain. IMO
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Post by twenty six »

What's not to believe from SN mate ? They always tell the truth, don't they ?
Surprised he disclosed their bid though.
Post Reply