Page 2 of 2

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Posted: 12 Dec 2008, 09:53
by twenty six
If 80k is right then fair do's it's a major offer.
However, I was told less than that.
I would prefer to hear it from the horse's mouth than rely upon what boxingchat says about another Promotor's bid.
Wellington ?

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Posted: 12 Dec 2008, 09:56
by Counter-puncher
you're not relying on boxinghcats word for it then? :lol:

deserter: I agree with this: I think Smith is the weakest of all four. Barker's the strongest prospect for my money, and I genuinely can't call it out of Elcock and Macklin.
any one of elcock macklin or bendall (or mcdermott IMO) beats Smith, unless he's suddenly grown a boxing brain. IMO

Re: Elcock V Macklin - March 7

Posted: 12 Dec 2008, 10:02
by twenty six
What's not to believe from SN mate ? They always tell the truth, don't they ?
Surprised he disclosed their bid though.