Although you might be right about Buncey's lack of direct influence, he's great at what he does.gobbles wrote:I love Buncey, but this statement is ridiculous. The guy who has done more to make sure that boxing is on TV is allegedly allegedly. He got ITV back in, he got Setanta involved. Ironically, by showing them the potential, he fell out with both. It was only then that they saw they could make it into a success and only in the past six months that Buncey got such a big on-screen presence. To make out that he is in somehow involved in negotiations for TV rights or telling them what to buy is laughable. After all, his biggest employer until recently was the BBC - various TV gigs plus a couple of shows on BBC London Radio - and he didn't persuade them to buy any fights, did he?Spud wrote:Bunce is singly the biggest reason why there is so much boxing on our screens - he has persuaded, bullied, threatened and whatever TV executives that boxing is the way forward and for that he deserves all of our support instead of comments which he does not deserve after all what he has done!!!EddieShredder wrote:Buncey is a legend..... He's hilariousHe plays on a character a bit... and yes, makes outlandish statements here and there, but he's great fun, knows his stuff, has played a big part in getting more boxing on our screens, and ultimately is great for the sport - and for attracting new viewers IMO.
Keep it up...
Where his weekly show is such a success is that they haven't gone down the Sky Sports News road of just plugging their own fights - therefore completely undermining themselves as a legitimate new source. Sky Sports News haven't mentioned Calzaghe's fights against Kessler, Hopkins or Jones, which must be hugely embarrassing for any actual journalists there.
And you are so, so wrong about FW.