Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

For RBR threads only
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.
So PPVs never lose money?
Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
He needs some false tan on them legs. :o
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by ajwesty13 »

SouthpawStephen wrote:How does Quigg do against guys like Rigo and Santa Cruz?
Santa Cruz is his best chance as Rigo a bridge to far though
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

'Talking 'bout my generation." :wink:
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Ketchel »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Ketchel »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
:lol: :witzend: I give in mate. You just crack on. :TU:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.
:lol: :witzend: I give in mate. You just crack on. :TU:
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13520
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
He needs some false tan on them legs. :o
You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13374
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by MightyWarrior »

How long to go till the main event boys ? I'm out and about & the Internet coverage sucks
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Loynesy »

I think we've just seen someone interviewed whose closely connected with Bolivia.....
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.
He needs some false tan on them legs. :o
You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?
:lol: I know mate. Mrs Hangover was complaining about them as well.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by taffytoon »

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:yes you do
Desperate stuff.
A bit like your Monthly pound for pound British thread
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13520
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by jameswilson »

Ketchel wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.
Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.

Or are you just exaggerating...
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

jameswilson wrote:
Ketchel wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.
Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.
Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.

Or are you just exaggerating...
Froch-Kessler wasn't a unification fight.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17236
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
Froch makes the same mistake when throwing punches though and Groves is faster and I'd say he has the bigger one punch power.
grannyman
Cruiserweight
Posts: 183
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 11:36

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by grannyman »

Naz.......even his hands are fat!!!!!!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.
Can tell he hasn't changed from the way he's talking, was never an act with him.
5burowz
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 198
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 00:00

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by 5burowz »

How big is Hamed going to get?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

SouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?
He got fat
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by Neil Gee »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.
I'm looking forward to this fight, they keep saying that it's Groves talk that has built the fight up but I fancied it because I watched Groves beat Alcoba and thought he was a star in the making.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Froch-Groves RBR *Spoiler alert*

Post by expe »

SouthpawStephen wrote:
expe wrote:
SouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?
He got fat
:lol: And quit after his first loss. The way he's talking, he should still be fighting.
At heavyweight
Post Reply