Seems to me that's what he's saying about you bruhski.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑08 Jun 2020, 17:17 Everyone is free to try it when they want to, no dares needed, Gil just wants others to put in all the work on that argument though![]()
Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Yep, but I' m the only one with specific reasons, 3 of them , he has none but then harps on about others doing no work when that describes him perfectly on that argument 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Those are some pretty good arguments.gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Jun 2020, 18:33Like I said aside from the 26 title defenses he beat 3 former Champions who were the biggest names possible basically to beat at that time.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 Jun 2020, 18:22
Quality means a lot more to me. You know that Thai dude at 53-0 or whatever..
He had beaten numerous contenders to get a title shot in the first place as a Black Man would've had to in 1937 to get a title shot.
After retiring as Champion in 1949 he came back to challenge for the title in 1950 losing to Ezzard Charles, and then proceeded to go on an 8 bout winning streak before losing to Future Champion Rocky Marciano.
His 8 bout winning streak included a win over solid contender, and Hall of Famer Jimmy Bivins.
All told he beat 8 Hall of Famers I believe. Some of them twice. He faced 10, and was only ever beaten by Hall of Famers.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
That's not about Floyd Mayweather and Joe 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
it's about Joe, obviously. You're welcome.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
You don't make a comparison between 2 specific fighters by only mentioning 1 of them, it's not the same thing at all.Come on bruh, you need to do a better job of trying to gobble Gil's balls for him 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Very small of you.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑08 Jun 2020, 17:33 You don't make a comparison between 2 specific fighters by only mentioning 1 of them, it's not the same thing at all.Come on bruh, you need to do a better job of trying to gobble Gil's balls for him![]()
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Is that a freudian slip about our boi Gilly 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Nah, I don't think about guys like you do.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
You're right, I don't think about them in the same passionate way 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Too late. You on record talking about Gil's package. Says a lot. Explains more. Thanks for the thrilling debate. Once again engaging with you ends in child's play. I'm sure you'll respond again as you've shown your proclivity of getting in the last word. Surely something you feel is clevor; but infantile. Ta-ta.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑08 Jun 2020, 17:48 You're right, I don't think about them in the same passionate way![]()
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39266
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
Lol, ya right, you bumped the discussion, you always engage and respond and will continue to do so , you get too easily triggered, it's like Devin Vargas all over 
Re: Is Muhammad Ali in Everybody's 'Top 10'
This is like a Who's on First routine 