Page 11 of 13

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:26
by skanksta
Andy Lee looks a weight div or more bigger than Dazzlin' Darren there - how the hell did he make Lt-Middle ?

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:27
by rossij8
boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
How many times?

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:27
by skanksta
whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:28
by Ruthless-RKO
Eddie Hearn shed some light on the strange scorecard, saying that the scores had been put into the wrong box and that it should have been a unanimous decision.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:29
by handsofstone
boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
Haskins done his arm in the 6th and barely threw it for the rest of the fight, plenty of guys have retired on their stool with an arm injury, Lee showed plenty of heart to go 12 rounds where he never won a clear round and was eating some flush right hands all night

He was awful though

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:30
by robster
Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
robster wrote:
I wonder if this is Clark Sammartino :doh:
He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?

Yup, saw it originally & watched it back again. I think that's the answer, the guy had the boxers the wrong way round on his cards. I'm on round 4 now, & he's still glancing at the cards

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:30
by MarkMcBurney
skanksta wrote:
whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.
That wouldn't be how it works in a ten point must system, if a fighter wins the round but gets knocked down, it should be 10-10.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:30
by skanksta
Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
robster wrote:
I wonder if this is Clark Sammartino :doh:
He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?
Probably checking who was who and getting it wrong - he was attentive in the later rounds.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:30
by handsofstone
Imagine that judge as a hitman :o

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:31
by skanksta
MarkMcBurney wrote:
skanksta wrote:
whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.
That wouldn't be how it works in a ten point must system, if a fighter wins the round but gets knocked down, it should be 10-10.
Coulda thought Haskins dominated the rounds 10-8 apart from the knockdowns ?
:lol:

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:32
by rossij8
handsofstone wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
Haskins done his arm in the 6th and barely threw it for the rest of the fight, plenty of guys have retired on their stool with an arm injury, Lee showed plenty of heart to go 12 rounds where he never won a clear round and was eating some flush right hands all night

He was awful though
^this but an injury like that makes you more awful?

Heart as always

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:32
by skanksta
handsofstone wrote:Imagine that judge as a hitman :o
:stop:

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:33
by 3132DW
robster wrote:
Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote: He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?

Yup, saw it originally & watched it back again. I think that's the answer, the guy had the boxers the wrong way round on his cards. I'm on round 4 now, & he's still glancing at the cards
That's the only feasible explanation.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:37
by Realistic
Good on Robert Smith saying he will never Judge in the sCountry again. IBF needs to take a serious look at this.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:38
by watsupdoc87
Ăˆire making dollar nigA. Fukin great night. Sd wtf. :bag:

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:49
by boxingknockout
Haskins looked no better than an area champion. Burnett better but not great.

Haskins looked like a 3 fight amateur novice. Hopefully he'll disappear

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:56
by Horse
boxingknockout wrote:Haskins looked no better than an area champion. Burnett better but not great.

Haskins looked like a 3 fight amateur novice. Hopefully he'll disappear
Hopefully, you'll disappear.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 18:57
by watsupdoc87
Go on horse. Your adopted Irish :bag:

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 19:04
by Boxing Prospect
...and after that....we should all watch Haskins vs Jamoye...

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 10 Jun 2017, 21:17
by wesshaw1985

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 11 Jun 2017, 00:50
by Ricky_
Shame Haskins can't dig a bit more, he was having great success banging uppercuts to the body but the seemed to gave no effect.

Booth really stamps his ID on a fighter.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 11 Jun 2017, 02:48
by samwbr
boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
How do you know what he was thinking.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 11 Jun 2017, 06:56
by Andrew
Overall very impressed with Burnett last night. Went up a few levels for me and he has the potential to be outstanding in a couple of years.

Say what you want about Haskins at least Ryan actually beat a belt holder as there are far too many fighters winning vacant belts these days.

Haskins is a tough tough man but I think that is the last we see of him.

Very good for boxing in Belfast last night. The atmosphere looked good throughout and the crowd were getting behind the undercard fighters.

As for Burnett's future Hearn said he has a mandatory v Emmanual Rodriguez ( never heard of him) may get a fight with McDonnel in first which would be interesting. Burnett has a belt but he is a distance from facing a Yamanaka ( WBC and ring magazine champion) or Zolani Tete. Great learning fight for him last night though.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 11 Jun 2017, 07:53
by 3132DW
Judge had fighters wrong way round - had 2 x 10-8's on the card - journo said he thought he had them mixed up and was scoring Haskins as Burnett and vice versa as he was totally confused when tallying up the scores.

Looks like he didn't know who was who which in a World Title fight is pretty incredible.

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Posted: 11 Jun 2017, 07:59
by handsofstone
Surely Hall or Malinga must be mandatories again soon