Page 12 of 21
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:27
by greg
squiggy wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:15
keirw wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 10:17
If Glowacki had simply taken a knee the ref may have given him a bit more time to recover, the fact he was rolling around like Neymar trying to get Briedis disqualified worked against him I think.
Both men fouled, Briedis was just better at it. Glowacki always has a chance against Briedis in a conventional boxing match, but in a fight there is only one winner.
If there is a rematch Briedis will find it easy to drag him into a fight, now that there is plenty of bad blood between the pair.
Maybe in the rematch they can allow eye gouging and ball kicking.
..let me guess the Byrds of Paradise wouldn't mind..
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:29
by boxing_rocks
squiggy wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:15
keirw wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 10:17
If Glowacki had simply taken a knee the ref may have given him a bit more time to recover, the fact he was rolling around like Neymar trying to get Briedis disqualified worked against him I think.
Both men fouled, Briedis was just better at it. Glowacki always has a chance against Briedis in a conventional boxing match, but in a fight there is only one winner.
If there is a rematch Briedis will find it easy to drag him into a fight, now that there is plenty of bad blood between the pair.
Maybe in the rematch they can allow eye gouging and ball kicking.
As a response to this ?
A rabbit punch is a blow to the back of the head or to the base of the skull.[1] It is considered especially dangerous because it can damage the cervical vertebrae and subsequently the spinal cord, which may lead to serious and irreparable spinal cord injury. A rabbit punch can also detach the victim's brain from the brain stem,[citation needed] which can kill instantly.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:38
by dagilechia
keirw wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 10:17
If Glowacki had simply taken a knee the ref may have given him a bit more time to recover, the fact he was rolling around like Neymar trying to get Briedis disqualified worked against him I think.
Both men fouled, Briedis was just better at it. Glowacki always has a chance against Briedis in a conventional boxing match, but in a fight there is only one winner.
If there is a rematch Briedis will find it easy to drag him into a fight, now that there is plenty of bad blood between the pair.
he was not trying to get Briedis dq'd. he was trying to get those 5 minutes. also, he was really hurt, he played a little bit, but he was really hurt as well.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:41
by ValMar
ironbeard wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 21:28

It was a reflexive reaction of a true fighter.
Yes.............
But, this was a high level boxing match, not a street fight.
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:49
by gilgamesh
Heretic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 07:50
gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jul 2019, 18:39
I disagree. He did it. He got a point deducted, and he went on to win the fight. I'd say he did the right thing.
The rule was enforced that you can't elbow a guy. He had a point deducted for it, and I'm sure would've been DQ'ed if it had happened again. If your opponent wants to make it dirty, defend yourself because the referee ain't doing it for you.
If somebody came at you with intent to kill, would you defend yourself or would you stand there waiting for the Cops to show up and handle it because that's what you're supposed to do, even though they're nowhere to be found?
Drastic example, but the same principle applies. Sometimes you gotta take sh*t into your own hands because the world don't give you no alternative.
We have a new boxing rule. You are allowed one elbow punch per fight at the cost of one point. Better make yours count.
You can also kick once to the balls but that's gonna cost you two points. Better make it count.
One wrestling throw will also only cost one point. Maybe none if it increases the number of PPV buys.
Sounds effing ridiculous
Elbow strikes are forbidden in boxing and done by the way Briedis did it clearly no accidental. When it results in hard knock down it should be automatic DQ.
What is your ques what would have happened if Mcgregor pulled that stunt on Mayweather?
There is very real possibility that the foul decided the whole match. It is definitely something that I don't want to see ever again in boxing ring.
If Breidis had simply fired that elbow apropos of nothing I'm sure the referee would've been harsher on him, but he referee has eyes, and saw that Glowacki had JUST cracked him full force in the back of the head. Now while that doesn't justify the Elbow 100% exactly, it makes it at the very least understandable why that would be your gut reaction.
You f*ckers are all too soft to be Boxing fans. It's a fight. If you wanna watch a dance contest where everybody is being goody goody I'm sure the Disney Channel has something for ya.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:53
by dagilechia
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:54
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:53
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
In other words. A little more Boo-Hoo-Hoo with a side of Whaaaahhhh. Your boy f*cking lost. Get over it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:56
by ValMar
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:49
Heretic wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 07:50
We have a new boxing rule. You are allowed one elbow punch per fight at the cost of one point. Better make yours count.
You can also kick once to the balls but that's gonna cost you two points. Better make it count.
One wrestling throw will also only cost one point. Maybe none if it increases the number of PPV buys.
Sounds effing ridiculous
Elbow strikes are forbidden in boxing and done by the way Briedis did it clearly no accidental. When it results in hard knock down it should be automatic DQ.
What is your ques what would have happened if Mcgregor pulled that stunt on Mayweather?
There is very real possibility that the foul decided the whole match. It is definitely something that I don't want to see ever again in boxing ring.
If Breidis had simply fired that elbow apropos of nothing I'm sure the referee would've been harsher on him, but he referee has eyes, and saw that Glowacki had JUST cracked him full force in the back of the head. Now while that doesn't justify the Elbow 100% exactly, it makes it at the very least understandable why that would be your gut reaction.
You f*ckers are all too soft to be Boxing fans. It's a fight. If you wanna watch a dance contest where everybody is being goody goody I'm sure the Disney Channel has something for ya.
What about the boxing rules ? Am I soft if I respect the rules ?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:57
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:54
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:53
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
In other words. A little more Boo-Hoo-Hoo with a side of Whaaaahhhh. Your boy f*cking lost. Get over it.
he did - in an unfair boxing/muay thai fight
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:58
by boxing_rocks
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:53
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
You should be watching street fights then, as your beloved Pole threw a rabbit punch which could cripple his opponent.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 11:59
by boxing_rocks
ValMar wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:56
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:49
If Breidis had simply fired that elbow apropos of nothing I'm sure the referee would've been harsher on him, but he referee has eyes, and saw that Glowacki had JUST cracked him full force in the back of the head. Now while that doesn't justify the Elbow 100% exactly, it makes it at the very least understandable why that would be your gut reaction.
You f*ckers are all too soft to be Boxing fans. It's a fight. If you wanna watch a dance contest where everybody is being goody goody I'm sure the Disney Channel has something for ya.
What about the boxing rules ? Am I soft if I respect the rules ?
We like fight which follow boxing rules, but if one fighter breaks the rules, he should expect retaliation.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:00
by gilgamesh
I respect the rules too. I'm not calling for every fight to be a goddamn savage brawl where anything goes. All I'm saying is that when somebody bends the rules blatantly, and hits you full force with a foul...do what it takes to protect yourself. In this world things don't always go as planned, and people don't always follow the rules. When somebody breaks 'em, and you're the one they're breaking 'em on, you just gonna stand there going "Hey ref help me please" or are you gonna crack the f*cking guy back with something hard and make him think twice about doing that sh*t again?
Your call.
I'd be the guy that cracked him back, and put his ass in check, and I respect that action more too.
Guys that spend whole fights "Hey ref, that was low".."Hey ref, that was in the back of the head"..."Hey ref...help"...that sh*t annoys me. Just handle your business. You're the fighter.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:00
by dagilechia
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:58
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:53
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
You should be watching street fights then, as your beloved Pole threw a rabbit punch which could cripple his opponent.
at the same time, Briedis was fouling him as well. btw, this punch landed more on the neck than it did on the back of the head. it was a foul of course though. i blame the referee for fućking up this fight. and Briedis is an idiot who is proud of what he did, he's not a sportsman at all.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:01
by Onetimeonly
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:53
it's a boxing fight, if i would like to watch elbow punches i would watch muay thai
And if I want to read grown men sob like bitches I'll join a soap opera forum. Get ahold of yourself!
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:01
by dagilechia
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:59
ValMar wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:56
What about the boxing rules ? Am I soft if I respect the rules ?
We like fight which follow boxing rules, but if one fighter breaks the rules, he should expect retaliation.
he shouldn't. this would be terrible for the boxers health and lifes. we just need competent judges and strict, clear rules.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:02
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:57
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 11:54
In other words. A little more Boo-Hoo-Hoo with a side of Whaaaahhhh. Your boy f*cking lost. Get over it.
he did - in an unfair boxing/muay thai fight
But but but...The Rules

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:02
by ValMar
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:00
I respect the rules too. I'm not calling for every fight to be a goddamn savage brawl where anything goes. All I'm saying is that when somebody bends the rules blatantly, and hits you full force with a foul...do what it takes to protect yourself. In this world things don't always go as planned, and people don't always follow the rules. When somebody breaks 'em, and you're the one they're breaking 'em on, you just gonna stand there going "Hey ref help me please" or are you gonna crack the f*cking guy back with something hard and make him think twice about doing that sh*t again?
Your call.
I'd be the guy that cracked him back, and put his ass in check, and I respect that action more too.
Guys that spend whole fights "Hey ref, that was low".."Hey ref, that was in the back of the head"..."Hey ref...help"...that sh*t annoys me. Just handle your business. You're the fighter.
I respect your attitude, but I can not agree...................
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:03
by gilgamesh
ValMar wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:02
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:00
I respect the rules too. I'm not calling for every fight to be a goddamn savage brawl where anything goes. All I'm saying is that when somebody bends the rules blatantly, and hits you full force with a foul...do what it takes to protect yourself. In this world things don't always go as planned, and people don't always follow the rules. When somebody breaks 'em, and you're the one they're breaking 'em on, you just gonna stand there going "Hey ref help me please" or are you gonna crack the f*cking guy back with something hard and make him think twice about doing that sh*t again?
Your call.
I'd be the guy that cracked him back, and put his ass in check, and I respect that action more too.
Guys that spend whole fights "Hey ref, that was low".."Hey ref, that was in the back of the head"..."Hey ref...help"...that sh*t annoys me. Just handle your business. You're the fighter.
I respect your attitude, but I can not agree...................
Ok.
That's fine. I'm the one that's right though.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:05
by dagilechia
no wonder why there are no consequences in boxing for blatant and systematical robberies, scandals and double standards if even some of the boxing fans accept this

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:08
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:05
no wonder why there are no consequences in boxing for blatant and systematical robberies, scandals and double standards if even some of the boxing fans accept this
Fight fans realize what a fight is. Quit being a little bitch.
You've basically dropped any slight shred of respect I could ever have for you on this forum, and dashed it into the ground. You've made yourself the Crybaby King of the World. You gonna keep defending your crown in this thread or are you done yet?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:09
by dagilechia
its like if someone taken the ball in the hands and scored a goal in a football match and said ''this bastard fućking fouled me!'' and the referee would accept it and this goal would count, he would just show the yellow card for that. later, he would let the match last 110 minutes to let them score again.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:11
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:09
its like if someone taken the ball in the hands and scored a goal in a football match and said ''this bastard fućking fouled me!'' and the referee would accept it and this goal would count, he would just show the yellow card for that. later, he would let the match last 110 minutes to let them score again.
A POINT WAS DEDUCTED. THE RULES WERE ENFORCED. YOUR BOY LOST. GET...THE F*CK...OVER...IT!!!!!!
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:11
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:08
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:05
no wonder why there are no consequences in boxing for blatant and systematical robberies, scandals and double standards if even some of the boxing fans accept this
Fight fans realize what a fight is. Quit being a little bitch.
You've basically dropped any slight shred of respect I could ever have for you on this forum, and dashed it into the ground. You've made yourself the Crybaby King of the World. You gonna keep defending your crown in this thread or are you done yet?
fans like you are fućking up this sport. partially because of the fans like you all the robberies and scandals in boxing happen without any consequences.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:12
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:11
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:08
Fight fans realize what a fight is. Quit being a little bitch.
You've basically dropped any slight shred of respect I could ever have for you on this forum, and dashed it into the ground. You've made yourself the Crybaby King of the World. You gonna keep defending your crown in this thread or are you done yet?
fans like you are fućking up this sport. partially because of the fans like you all the robberies and scandals in boxing happen without any consequences.
Fans like you are too soft for this sport.
Hell I liked Glowacki before. This thread is making me enjoy that elbow to his jaw more every time I see it, and I can't wait for the rematch when Breidis stomps his ass again so you can cry some more.
If the fight had been EXACTLY the same except for it were Breidis who'd hit him in the back of the head while Glowacki responded with an elbow, an then went on to win you wouldn't have said a goddamn word would you? At any rate you certainly wouldn't STILL be talking about it. That's for 100% certain.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:13
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:11
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:09
its like if someone taken the ball in the hands and scored a goal in a football match and said ''this bastard fućking fouled me!'' and the referee would accept it and this goal would count, he would just show the yellow card for that. later, he would let the match last 110 minutes to let them score again.
A POINT WAS DEDUCTED. THE RULES WERE ENFORCED. YOUR BOY LOST. GET...THE F*CK...OVER...IT!!!!!!
you mean the rule that a round lasts 3 minutes or the rule, that fighters team members can't enter the ring before the round is stopped by the ref or that a fighter hurt by an illegal punch is given up to 5 minutes to recover?