BoxRec

tonyevs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 03:56

dan28uk wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:40

BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:31

What a right dick this fella looks.
60 yr old man with bouffant mullet hair do .. trying to look cool like his 1970's hey day with shirt undone and blue sunglasses.

Why would anyone expect him to be anything other than the d1ck head he looks?

And Colin Hart has been a parody of the clueless armchair expert since I can remember.

Him and Buncey will be the highest earners in their field.

mickey1975 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 04:05

tonyevs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 03:56

dan28uk wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:40

What a right dick this fella looks.
60 yr old man with bouffant mullet hair do .. trying to look cool like his 1970's hey day with shirt undone and blue sunglasses.

Why would anyone expect him to be anything other than the d1ck head he looks?

And Colin Hart has been a parody of the clueless armchair expert since I can remember.

Him and Buncey will be the highest earners in their field.

They’ve become hybrid journalists/inside men. When GAD is the interviewer of Fury’s live shows it makes it impossible to take what he says about Fury seriously as he’s clearly biased.

Bunce is similar with his links with BT.

And both are useless idiots

Enough has been written about the tool that Buncey has now become .. they guy literally drools over John Fury.

GAD looks a whopper for sure .. an old fella still trying to recreate his hey day of 40-50 yrs previously.
He seems to think he's the missing Rolling Stone (that never was)

Bernd Bronte has spoken about dealing with Fury.

He said that even though Fury had signed a rematch clause, when Wlad triggered the rematch, Fury kept on trying to renegotiate the rematch contract, and delayed proceedings with fake injuries etc, and the whole thing collapsed like a house of cards on Fury when it emerged that he had failed a PED test.

Ultimately, they found him to be a time waster and untrustworthy.

Fast forward all these year's and here we are with endless roadblocks, and Fury's own trainer saying he wasn't here to train him.

Gareth A Davies loses credibility when they say things like " they couldn't get it over the line". Fury never wanted it to go over the line. Total cowardice on his part. Nothing more, nothing less.

I think Fury, who has a long history of messing around and ducking fights has overplayed his hand here. Fury vs Uysk was such a high profile fight and the feedback on social media is huge and consistent:

*Fury has become boring to listen to; and

*Is a ducker.

tonyevs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 04:19 And both are useless idiots

Enough has been written about the tool that Buncey has now become .. they guy literally drools over John Fury.

GAD looks a whopper for sure .. an old fella still trying to recreate his hey day of 40-50 yrs previously.
He seems to think he's the missing Rolling Stone (that never was)

His RAW podcast with Kougan was surprisingly interesting

Apparently we’re now getting Fury v Joyce. Wonder what the excuse for this one not happening will be.

ashall2 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 04:56 Apparently we’re now getting Fury v Joyce. Wonder what the excuse for this one not happening will be.

The Zhang fight first though for Joe? Which is 3 weeks today. Provided he wins (which he should) then….

we looking at 4-5 months of more nonsense. Doofus is getting prepped. Oh joy.

The 2 men involved in negotiations (FW and Krassyuk) both state live on radio that Fury is not to blame and vow to carry on negotiations. Unbeknown to one of them, Usyk had fled to Kiev.
2 esteemed journalists report the obvious facts and the knitting circle is up in arms.

oh my lord this is still going? ffs.

Just read a comment on line that made me giggle.

Tyson Fury will be remembered as a champion that's had more kids than title defenses.

FW using Canelo as a benchmark why Fury should get more. “Do you think anyone gets close to a 90-10 split against Canelo, no where near it” The problem with this argument is they are talking about a rematch if Fury lost. I’m sure Bivol won’t be accepting peanuts in the Canelo rematch if it happens.

I dread the upcoming Fury interview/social media post where he will blame Usyk for everything and try to manipulate public opinion with his endless contradictions and lies. It is actually quite amazing how many people are calling out his actions on YouTube etc.

Controversial wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:33 FW using Canelo as a benchmark why Fury should get more. “Do you think anyone gets close to a 90-10 split against Canelo, no where near it” The problem with this argument is they are talking about a rematch if Fury lost. I’m sure Bivol won’t be accepting peanuts in the Canelo rematch if it happens.

Does FW genuinely believe Fury wants this fight? He's being played if he does

Controversial wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:33 FW using Canelo as a benchmark why Fury should get more. “Do you think anyone gets close to a 90-10 split against Canelo, no where near it” The problem with this argument is they are talking about a rematch if Fury lost. I’m sure Bivol won’t be accepting peanuts in the Canelo rematch if it happens.

Not only is Fury a C-lister compared to Canelo but weren't the splits against GGG around 60:40 55:45 and 70:30? Obviously Frank is trying to maximise earnings when he is finally the A side in a big fight but he wasn't making the same arguments when negotiating for Joshua/Fury.

joshj909 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:13

Controversial wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:33 FW using Canelo as a benchmark why Fury should get more. “Do you think anyone gets close to a 90-10 split against Canelo, no where near it” The problem with this argument is they are talking about a rematch if Fury lost. I’m sure Bivol won’t be accepting peanuts in the Canelo rematch if it happens.

Not only is Fury a C-lister compared to Canelo but weren't the splits against GGG around 60:40 55:45 and 70:30? Obviously Frank is trying to maximise earnings when he is finally the A side in a big fight but he wasn't making the same arguments when negotiating for Joshua/Fury.

Yeah he’s trying to compare apples to oranges. I’m sure guys like Fielding couldn’t negotiate big splits but GGG could

Joyce seems genuinely a good guy. He shouldn’t waste a second of his time with the nonsense of Fury ‘negotiations.’ And he’s probably top of Fury’s list of heavyweights he really doesn’t fancy facing. He’d end up in a heap like Joe Parker.

tonyevs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 03:56

dan28uk wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:40

BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 16:31

What a right dick this fella looks.
60 yr old man with bouffant mullet hair do .. trying to look cool like his 1970's hey day with shirt undone and blue sunglasses.

Why would anyone expect him to be anything other than the d1ck head he looks?

And Colin Hart has been a parody of the clueless armchair expert since I can remember.

Hes that grandad/uncle that you absolutely cringe about when seen in public with him or when he meets friends for the first time.

BigDoofus wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:20 The 2 men involved in negotiations (FW and Krassyuk) both state live on radio that Fury is not to blame and vow to carry on negotiations. Unbeknown to one of them, Usyk had fled to Kiev.
2 esteemed journalists report the obvious facts and the knitting circle is up in arms.

You are really like Comical Ali or a Tory backbencher trolling out the same one liners and ignoring the obvious context that had been explained to you 3000 times.

Frostieballs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 07:29

BigDoofus wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:20 The 2 men involved in negotiations (FW and Krassyuk) both state live on radio that Fury is not to blame and vow to carry on negotiations. Unbeknown to one of them, Usyk had fled to Kiev.
2 esteemed journalists report the obvious facts and the knitting circle is up in arms.

You are really like Comical Ali or a Tory backbencher trolling out the same one liners and ignoring the obvious context that had been explained to you 3000 times.

Time to block him I think

joshj909 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:21

Frostieballs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 07:29

BigDoofus wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:20 The 2 men involved in negotiations (FW and Krassyuk) both state live on radio that Fury is not to blame and vow to carry on negotiations. Unbeknown to one of them, Usyk had fled to Kiev.
2 esteemed journalists report the obvious facts and the knitting circle is up in arms.

You are really like Comical Ali or a Tory backbencher trolling out the same one liners and ignoring the obvious context that had been explained to you 3000 times.

What Krassyuk said live doesn’t suit your argument so you dismiss it. He was asked if he could get Usyk to agree to fight and he said only “The Lord” could answer. Why did he not tell FW and the listeners that Usyk had already done a runner?

joshj909 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:21

BigDoofus wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 08:30

Frostieballs wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 07:29

BigDoofus wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 05:20 The 2 men involved in negotiations (FW and Krassyuk) both state live on radio that Fury is not to blame and vow to carry on negotiations. Unbeknown to one of them, Usyk had fled to Kiev.
2 esteemed journalists report the obvious facts and the knitting circle is up in arms.

You are really like Comical Ali or a Tory backbencher trolling out the same one liners and ignoring the obvious context that had been explained to you 3000 times.

What Krassyuk said live doesn’t suit your argument so you dismiss it. He was asked if he could get Usyk to agree to fight and he said only “The Lord” could answer. Why did he not tell FW and the listeners that Usyk had already done a runner?

I doubt Usyk is involved in the actual negotiations so not sure why they are making a deal of this, his team are there for that and I guess when it was clear it wasn't happening, and no need for press interviews over here, he left.

joshj909 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2023, 06:21